Abstract
The availability of online courses has increased dramatically; however, the effectiveness of online teaching remains uncertain. The Tecnologico de Monterrey has implemented the Tec21 educational model that includes online teaching with the modality of the FIT courses (Flexibility, Interaction and Technology), a type of well-designed courses using the CANVAS web-based platform and using ZOOM as a tool for communication with students. To compare the objective learning outcomes between a FIT course and a face-to-face course (Microbiology for Engineering), an analysis was made between these two types of courses, with the same or different instructor. Our results clearly indicate that the grades of the students enrolled in the FIT groups were higher than those of the classroom courses. These results were confirmed when the historical record files of both types of teaching were examined. Satisfaction surveys however revealed that students prefer face-to-face courses to online courses. Our data implies that it is necessary to work more on the tools of the distance-learning courses to make them extremely attractive and interesting for students.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Hansen, J.D., Reich, J.: Democratizing education? Examining access and usage patterns in massive open online courses. Science 350, 1245–1248 (2015)
Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M., Jones, K.: Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning: a meta-analysis and review of online learning studies, p. xvi, xvii. US Department of Education. Office of Planning Evaluation, and Policy Development. Policy and Program Studies Service (2010). ED-04-CO-0040
Membrillo-Hernández, J., et al.: Challenge based learning: the case of sustainable development engineering at the Tecnologico de Monterrey, Mexico City campus. In: Auer, M., Guralnick, D., Simonics, I. (eds) Teaching and Learning in a Digital World, ICL 2017. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol. 715. Springer (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73210-7_103
Schoenfeld-Tacher, R., McConnell, S., Graham, M.: Do no harm: a comparison of the effects of on-line vs. traditional delivery media on a science course. J. Sci. Educ. Technol. 10, 257–265 (2001)
Biel, R., Brame, C.J.: Traditional versus online biology courses: connecting course design and student learning in an online setting. J. Microbiol. Biology Educ. 17, 417–422 (2016)
Allen, I.E., Seaman, J.: On-line report card: tracking online education in the United States (Rep.) Sloan Consortium (Sloan-C) (2016). http://onlinelearningconsortium.org/read/online-education-united-states-2015
Barbeau, M.L., Johnson, M., Gibson, C., Rogers, K.A.: The development and assessment of an online microscopic anatomy laboratory course. Anat. Sci. Educ. 6, 246–256 (2013)
Collins, M.: Comparing web, correspondence, and lecture versions of a second-year, non-major biology course. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 31, 21–27 (2000)
Johnson, M.: Introductory biology online: assessing outcomes of two student populations. J. College Sci. Teach. 31, 312–317 (2002)
King, P., Hildreth, D.: Internet courses: are they worth the effort? J. College Sci. Teach. 31, 112–115 (2001)
Lunsford, E., Bolton, K.: Coming to terms with the online instructional revolution: a success story revelaed through action research. Bioscene 32, 12–16 (2006)
Siemens, G., Gasevic, D., Dawson, S.: Preparing for the digital university: a review of the history and current state of distance, blended and online learning 97, 120 (2015). http://linkresearchlab.org/PreparingDigitalUniversity.pdf
Somenarain, L., Akkaraju, S., Gharbaran, R.: Student perceptions and learning outcomes in asynchronous and synchronous online learning environments in a biology course. MERLOT J. Online Teach. Learn. 6, 353–356 (2010)
Reuter, R.: Online versus in the classroom: student success in a hands-on lab class. Am. J. Distance Educ. 23, 151–162 (2009)
Acknowledgements
We deeply acknowledge all the personnel of the School of Engineering and Sciences and the Department of Digital Programs of the ITESM for their support throughout all the steps of this experimental set up.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Castillo-Reyna, J. et al. (2020). Teaching and Learning Microbiology for Engineers in a Digital World: The Case of the FIT Courses at the Tecnologico de Monterrey, Mexico. In: Auer, M., Tsiatsos, T. (eds) The Challenges of the Digital Transformation in Education. ICL 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 916. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11932-4_84
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11932-4_84
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-11931-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-11932-4
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)