Skip to main content

Admission/Discharge Criterion for Acute Care Surgery Patients in the ICU: A General Review of ICU Admission and Discharge Indications

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Intensive Care for Emergency Surgeons

Part of the book series: Hot Topics in Acute Care Surgery and Trauma ((HTACST))

Abstract

Surgical patients requiring intensive care unit [ICU] care originate from a variety of admitting primary services and may require critical care services at any time during their course of illness. This care spectrum can range from routine postoperative monitoring of complex cases to resuscitation to restore normal physiology and correct metabolic acidosis, hypothermia, and coagulopathy. This chapter will discuss admission and discharge criterion for acute care surgery patients in the ICU. Additional concepts to be discussed include the use of rapid response teams as an aid to ICU triage, ICU organization, frailty of patients in advanced age, clinical scoring systems, futility versus care that is appropriate for a given diagnosis, advanced directives, ICU economics, communication best practices, and family engagement. It is imperative that acute care surgeons practicing around the world, in hospital models with variable resources, understand these concepts to optimizing patient care.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Pascual JL, Blank NW, Holena DN, Robertson MP, Diop M, Allen SR, et al. There’s no place like home: boarding surgical icu patients in other icus and the effect of distances from the home unit. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014;76:1096–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Coccolini F, Roberts D, Ansaloni L, Ivatury R, Gamberini E, Kluger Y, et al. The open abdomen in trauma and non-trauma patients: Wses guidelines. World J Emerg Surg. 2018;13:7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. van der Sluis FJ, Slagt C, Liebman B, Beute J, Mulder JW, Engel AF. The impact of open versus closed format icu admission practices on the outcome of high risk surgical patients: a cohort analysis. BMC Surg. 2011;11:18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Nates JL, Nunnally M, Kleinpell R, Blosser S, Goldner J, Birriel B, et al. Icu admission, discharge, and triage guidelines: a framework to enhance clinical operations, development of institutional policies, and further research. Crit Care Med. 2016;44:1553–602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Swedish Council on Health Technology A. Sbu Systematic Review Summaries. Triage methods and patient flow processes in emergency departments: a systematic review. Stockholm: Swedish Council on Health Technology Assessment (SBU); 2010. Copyright (c) 2010 by the Swedish Council on Health Technology Assessment.

    Google Scholar 

  6. LaMantia MA, Stewart PW, Platts-Mills TF, Biese KJ, Forbach C, Zamora E, et al. Predictive value of initial triage vital signs for critically ill older adults. West J Emerg Med. 2013;14:453–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Holena DN, Wiebe DJ, Carr BG, Hsu JY, Sperry JL, Peitzman AB, et al. Lead-time bias and interhospital transfer after injury: trauma center admission vital signs underpredict mortality in transferred trauma patients. J Am Coll Surg. 2017;224:255–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Winters BD, Weaver SJ, Pfoh ER, Yang T, Pham JC, Dy SM. Rapid-response systems as a patient safety strategy: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med. 2013;158:417–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Jones DA, De Vita MA, Bellomo R. Rapid-response teams. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:139–46.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hillman K, Chen J, Cretikos M, Bellomo R, Brown D, Doig G, et al. Introduction of the medical emergency team (met) system: a cluster-randomised controlled trial. Lancet (London, England). 2005;365:2091–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Briggs A, Peitzman AB. Surgical rescue in medical patients: the role of acute care surgeons as the surgical rapid response team. Crit Care Clin. 2018;34:209–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Peitzman AB, Leppaniemi A, Kutcher ME, Forsythe RM, Rosengart MR, Sperry JL, et al. Surgical rescue: an essential component of acute care surgery. Scand J Surg. 2015;104:135–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Blanch L, Abillama FF, Amin P, Christian M, Joynt GM, Myburgh J, et al. Triage decisions for icu admission: report from the task force of the world federation of societies of intensive and critical care medicine. J Crit Care. 2016;36:301–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lighthall GK, Vazquez-Guillamet C. Understanding decision making in critical care. Clin Med Res. 2015;13:156–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bagshaw SM, Stelfox HT, McDermid RC, Rolfson DB, Tsuyuki RT, Baig N, et al. Association between frailty and short- and long-term outcomes among critically ill patients: a multicentre prospective cohort study. Can Med Assoc J. 2014;186:E95–E102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Fried LP, Tangen CM, Walston J, Newman AB, Hirsch C, Gottdiener J, et al. Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2001;56:M146–56.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Rockwood K, Song X, MacKnight C, Bergman H, Hogan DB, McDowell I, et al. A global clinical measure of fitness and frailty in elderly people. Can Med Assoc J. 2005;173:489–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Rockwood K, Fox RA, Stolee P, Robertson D, Beattie BL. Frailty in elderly people: an evolving concept. Can Med Assoc J. 1994;150:489–95.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Lin H-S, Watts JN, Peel NM, Hubbard RE. Frailty and post-operative outcomes in older surgical patients: a systematic review. BMC Geriatr. 2016;16:157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Brody BA, Halevy A. Is futility a futile concept? J Med Philos. 1995;20:123–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Schneiderman LJ, Jecker NS, Jonsen AR. Medical futility: its meaning and ethical implications. Ann Intern Med. 1990;112:949–54.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Huynh TN, Kleerup EC, Raj PP, Wenger NS. The opportunity cost of futile treatment in the icu*. Crit Care Med. 2014;42:1977–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Bosslet GT, Pope TM, Rubenfeld GD, Lo B, Truog RD, Rushton CH, et al. An official ats/aacn/accp/esicm/sccm policy statement: responding to requests for potentially inappropriate treatments in intensive care units. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2015;191:1318–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Rubulotta F, Rubulotta G. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation and ethics. Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2013;25:265–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ulrich CM, Grady C. Perceptions of appropriateness of care in the intensive care unit. JAMA. 2012;307:1370–2.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Anstey MH, Adams JL, McGlynn EA. Perceptions of the appropriateness of care in California adult intensive care units. Crit Care. 2015;19:51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kross EK, Curtis JR. Icu clinicians’ perceptions of appropriateness of care and the importance of nurse-physician collaboration. Arch Intern Med. 2012;172:889–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Piers RD, Azoulay E, Ricou B, Dekeyser Ganz F, Decruyenaere J, Max A, et al. Perceptions of appropriateness of care among European and Israeli intensive care unit nurses and physicians. JAMA. 2011;306:2694–703.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Vincent JL. European attitudes towards ethical problems in intensive care medicine: Results of an ethical questionnaire. Intensive Care Med. 1990;16:256–64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Giannini A, Consonni D. Physicians’ perceptions and attitudes regarding inappropriate admissions and resource allocation in the intensive care setting. Br J Anaesth. 2006;96:57–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Wunsch H, Linde-Zwirble WT, Harrison DA, Barnato AE, Rowan KM, Angus DC. Use of intensive care services during terminal hospitalizations in England and the united states. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2009;180:875–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Sirio CA, Tajimi K, Taenaka N, Ujike Y, Okamoto K, Katsuya H. A cross-cultural comparison of critical care delivery: Japan and the united states. Chest. 2002;121:539–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Prin M, Wunsch H. International comparisons of intensive care: informing outcomes and improving standards. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2012;18:700–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Sehatzadeh S. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation in patients with terminal illness: an evidence-based analysis. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2014;14:1–38.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Walker AF. The legal duty of physicians and hospitals to provide emergency care. CMAJ. 2002;166:465–9.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Wang AY, Ma HP, Kao WF, Tsai SH, Chang CK. Characteristics and outcomes of “do not resuscitate” patients admitted to the emergency department-intensive care unit. J Formos Med Assoc. 2018;118(1):223–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Paul Olson TJ, Brasel KJ, Redmann AJ, Alexander GC, Schwarze ML. Surgeon-reported conflict with intensivists about postoperative goals of care. JAMA Surg. 2013;148:29–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Kruser JM, Nabozny MJ, Steffens NM, Brasel KJ, Campbell TC, Gaines ME, et al. “Best case/worst case”: qualitative evaluation of a novel communication tool for difficult in-the-moment surgical decisions. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2015;63:1805–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Taylor LJ, Nabozny MJ, Steffens NM, Tucholka JL, Brasel KJ, Johnson SK, et al. A framework to improve surgeon communication in high-stakes surgical decisions: Best case/worst case. JAMA Surg. 2017;152:531–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Thakar S, Dadlani R, Sivaraju L, Aryan S, Mohan D, Sai Kiran NA, et al. A value-based, no-cost-to-patient health model in the developing world: critical appraisal of a unique patient-centric neurosurgery unit. Surg Neurol Int. 2015;6:131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Adhikari NK, Fowler RA, Bhagwanjee S, Rubenfeld GD. Critical care and the global burden of critical illness in adults. Lancet (London, England). 2010;376:1339–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Halpern NA, Pastores SM. Critical care medicine beds, use, occupancy and costs in the united states: a methodological review. Crit Care Med. 2015;43:2452–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Le Gall JR, Lemeshow S, Saulnier F. A new simplified acute physiology score (saps ii) based on a European/north American multicenter study. JAMA. 1993;270:2957–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Ferreira FL. Serial evaluation of the sofa score to predict outcome in critically ill patients. JAMA Intern Med. 2001;286(14):1754.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Haniffa R, Isaam I, De Silva AP, Dondorp AM, De Keizer NF. Performance of critical care prognostic scoring systems in low and middle-income countries: a systematic review. Crit Care. 2018;22:18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Haniffa R, Pubudu De Silva A, de Azevedo L, Baranage D, Rashan A, Baelani I, et al. Improving icu services in resource-limited settings: perceptions of icu workers from low-middle-, and high-income countries. J Crit Care. 2018;44:352–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Carson SS, Stocking C, Podsadecki T, Christenson J, Pohlman A, MacRae S, et al. Effects of organizational change in the medical intensive care unit of a teaching hospital: a comparison of ‘open’ and ‘closed’ formats. JAMA. 1996;276:322–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Capuzzo M, Moreno RP, Alvisi R. Admission and discharge of critically ill patients. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2010;16:499–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Ilan R, LeBaron CD, Christianson MK, Heyland DK, Day A, Cohen MD. Handover patterns: an observational study of critical care physicians. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12:11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Leonard M, Graham S, Bonacum D. The human factor: the critical importance of effective teamwork and communication in providing safe care. Qual Saf Health Care. 2004;13:i85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Panesar RS, Albert B, Messina C, Parker M. The effect of an electronic sbar communication tool on documentation of acute events in the pediatric intensive care unit. Am J Med Qual. 2016;31:64–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Marshall AP, Tobiano G, Murphy N, Comadira G, Willis N, Gardiner T, et al. Handover from operating theatre to the intensive care unit: a quality improvement study. Aust Crit Care. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aucc.2018.03.009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Parent B, LaGrone LN, Albirair MT, Serina PT, Keller JM, Cuschieri J, et al. Effect of standardized handoff curriculum on improved clinician preparedness in the intensive care unit: a stepped-wedge cluster randomized clinical trial. JAMA Surg. 2018;153(5):464–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Malekzadeh J, Mazluom SR, Etezadi T, Tasseri A. A standardized shift handover protocol: improving nurses’ safe practice in intensive care units. J Caring Sci. 2013;2:177–85.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Park M, Vos P, Vlaskamp BNS, Kohlrausch A, Oldenbeuving AW. The influence of apache ii score on the average noise level in an intensive care unit: an observational study. BMC Anesthesiol. 2015;15:42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Darbyshire JL, Young JD. An investigation of sound levels on intensive care units with reference to the who guidelines. Crit Care. 2013;17:R187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Xie H, Kang J, Mills GH. Clinical review: the impact of noise on patients’ sleep and the effectiveness of noise reduction strategies in intensive care units. Crit Care. 2009;13:208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. National Surgical Research Collaborative. Multicentre observational study of performance variation in provision and outcome of emergency appendicectomy. Br J Surg. 2013;100:1240–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Gonzalo JD, Himes J, McGillen B, Shifflet V, Lehman E. Interprofessional collaborative care characteristics and the occurrence of bedside interprofessional rounds: a cross-sectional analysis. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016;16(1):459.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Jacobowski NL, Girard TD, Mulder JA, Ely EW. Communication in critical care: family rounds in the intensive care unit. Am J Crit Care. 2010;19:421–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Seaman JB, Arnold RM, Scheunemann LP, White DB. An integrated framework for effective and efficient communication with families in the adult intensive care unit. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2017;14:1015–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Machare Delgado E, Callahan A, Paganelli G, Reville B, Parks SM, Marik PE. Multidisciplinary family meetings in the icu facilitate end-of-life decision making. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2009;26:295–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Huntington B, Kuhn N. Communication gaffes: a root cause of malpractice claims. Proc (Baylor Univ Med Cent). 2003;16:157–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Cognet S, Coyer F. Discharge practices for the intensive care patient: a qualitative exploration in the general ward setting. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2014;30:292–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Sen A, Xiao Y, Lee SA, Hu P, Dutton RP, Haan J, et al. Daily multidisciplinary discharge rounds in a trauma center: a little time, well spent. J Trauma. 2009;66:880–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Stein R, Neufeld D, Shwartz I, Erez I, Haas I, Magen A, et al. Assessment of surgical discharge summaries and evaluation of a new quality improvement model. Isr Med Assoc J. 2014;16:714–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Prin M, Wunsch H. The role of stepdown beds in hospital care. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014;190:1210–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Lissauer ME, Diaz JJ, Narayan M, Shah PK, Hanna NN. Surgical intensive care unit admission variables predict subsequent readmission. Am Surg. 2013;79:583–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Narayan, M., Kashuk, J.L. (2019). Admission/Discharge Criterion for Acute Care Surgery Patients in the ICU: A General Review of ICU Admission and Discharge Indications. In: Picetti, E., Pereira, B., Razek, T., Narayan, M., Kashuk, J. (eds) Intensive Care for Emergency Surgeons. Hot Topics in Acute Care Surgery and Trauma. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11830-3_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11830-3_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-11829-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-11830-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics