Skip to main content

Empirical Indicators of Innovative Readiness of the Population: Experience of the Application of the Bogardus Scale

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Sustainable Growth and Development of Economic Systems

Part of the book series: Contributions to Economics ((CE))

Abstract

The study analyzes the possibilities of applying the Bogardus scale for analyzing the population’s readiness to adopt innovations. The study used Bogardus scale, which was adapted for the purpose of scientific research to study the innovative openness of the population. Theoretical and methodological principles of the value and activity approaches and the theory of everyday life and the phenomenological paradigm were used as a theoretical and methodological basis. Based on adapted Bogardus scale, the following indicators are defined and used: innovative openness, acceptability, isolation, and restraint. The index of innovative readiness of the population of the Samara region is determined, and also the socio-demographic characteristics of each of their groups of the respondents are analyzed. The dominance of innovative isolation among the inhabitants of the region and the lack of interrelation between socio-demographic characteristics and the level of openness to innovation have been revealed. The scientific novelty of the research consists in isolating four main positions in the population structure: openness, acceptability, isolation, and restraint in relation to innovations. According to the research results, in general, the population is characterized by innovative isolation, which indicates an understanding of the inevitability of changes in the life of the country and the city, but the unwillingness to accept changes in one’s own life. The weak influence of socio-demographic characteristics on the degree of openness of the population to innovation indicates, on the one hand, the homogeneity of the population’s attitudes, and on the other, on deeper mechanisms of determination. The main provisions and conclusions of the study can be used in scientific and pedagogical activity when considering questions about the openness of the population of the region to innovations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bass, F.M.: The Evolution of General Theory of the Diffusion of Technological Innovations. Polykarp Kusch Series. The University of Texas at Dallas (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogardus, E.S.: Social Distance. University of Southern California Press, Los Angeles (1959)

    Google Scholar 

  • Drucker, P.F.: Innovation and Entrepreneurship. Harper & Row, Publishers, New York (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ilyinikh, S.A., Mikhailova, E.V.: Innovations in organizations: implementation and resistance. Sociol. Res. 6, 86–90 (2015) (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Karpova, Yu.A.: Introduction Innovation to Sociology. Peter, St. Petersburg (2004) (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lapin, N.I.: Theory and Practice of Innovation: Textbook. Allowance. University Book; Logos, Moscow (2008) (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Malkina, M.Yu. Management of innovative development as a complex of interrelated problems. Problems Theory Practice Manage 2, 73–80 (2005) (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R.: Social theory and social structure. Sociol. Res. 3, 105–110 (1992) (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Meshkov, A.A.: The main directions of innovation research in American sociology. Sociol. Res. 5,117–128 (1996) (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E.M.: Diffusion of Innovations, 4th edn, pp. 11–24. The Free Press, A Division of Simon & Schuster Inc., New York (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  • Russians About the USE: The All-Russian Public Opinion Research Center (2017). In URL: https://infographics.wciom.ru/theme-archive/society/religion-lifestyle/education-children/article/rossijane-o-egeh-monitoring.html. Accessed 13 Sept 2017

  • Schumpeter, J.: The Theory of Economic Development. DirectMedia Publishing, Moscow (2008) (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Tard, G.: Laws of Imitation: Translated from French. Academic Project, Moscow (2011) (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, V., Znaniecky, F.: Three types of personality. In: Zdravomyslov, G., Lapin, N.I. (eds.) General Sociology, pp. 173–189. Higher School, Moscow (2006) (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  • USE-2016: Myths and reality. The All-Russian Public Opinion Research Center (2016). In: URL: https://wciom.ru/index.php?id=236&uid=115766. Accessed on 13 Sept 2017 (In Russian)

  • Weber, M.: Types of Domination. Selected Works. Progress, Moscow (1990) (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Y. A. Urgalkin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Rostova, A.V., Urgalkin, Y.A. (2019). Empirical Indicators of Innovative Readiness of the Population: Experience of the Application of the Bogardus Scale. In: Ashmarina, S., Vochozka, M. (eds) Sustainable Growth and Development of Economic Systems. Contributions to Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11754-2_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics