Abstract
For many commentators, the Eichmann trial signifies a shift in Arendt’s focus, from the vita activa to the vita contemplativa; from action and speech in the public sphere to the life of the mind. Accordingly, Arendt’s response to the phenomenon she identified in Eichmann is perceived to be the capacity for critical, “Socratic” thinking, which may save the individual thinker from participating in evil while everybody else is swept away by the genocidal imperatives of the ruling regime. This chapter turns attention to Arendt’s reluctance about the “Socratic” answer, which she thought was important yet limited in its application to “the many,” and shows that Arendt had a complementary, “political” response to the “banality of evil”: the constant practice of critical thinking and judgment in the public sphere with our fellow citizens.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lederman, S. (2019). Facing the Banality of Evil: Arendt’s Political Response to Eichmann. In: Hannah Arendt and Participatory Democracy. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11692-7_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11692-7_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-11691-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-11692-7
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)