Abstract
Modern geodesy is undergoing a crucial transformation from the Newtonian paradigm to the Einstein theory of general relativity. This is motivated by advances in developing quantum geodetic sensors including gravimeters and gradientometers, atomic clocks and fiber optics for making ultra-precise measurements of geoid and multipolar structure of Earth’s gravitational field. At the same time, Very Long Baseline Interferometry, Satellite Laser Ranging and Global Navigation Satellite System have achieved an unprecedented level of accuracy in measuring spatial coordinates of reference points of the International Terrestrial Reference Frame and the world height system. The main geodetic reference standard to which gravimetric measurements of Earth’s gravitational field are referred, is called normal gravity field which is represented in the Newtonian gravity by the field of a uniformly rotating, homogeneous Maclaurin ellipsoid having mass and quadrupole momentum equal to the total mass and (tide-free) quadrupole moment of the gravitational field of Earth. The present chapter extends the concept of the normal gravity field from the Newtonian theory to the realm of general relativity. We focus on the calculation of the post-Newtonian approximation of the normal field that would be sufficiently precise for near-future practical applications. We show that in general relativity the level surface of homogeneous and uniformly rotating fluid is no longer described by the Maclaurin ellipsoid in the most general case but represents an axisymmetric spheroid of the fourth order (PN spheroid) with respect to the geodetic Cartesian coordinates. At the same time, admitting post-Newtonian inhomogeneity of mass density in the form of concentric elliptical shells allows us to preserve the level surface of the fluid as an exact ellipsoid of rotation. We parametrize the mass density distribution and the level equipotential surface with two parameters which are intrinsically connected to the existence of the residual gauge freedom, and derive the post-Newtonian normal gravity field of the rotating spheroid both inside and outside of the rotating fluid body. The normal gravity field is given, similarly to the Newtonian gravity, in a closed form by a finite number of the ellipsoidal harmonics. We employ transformation from the ellipsoidal to spherical coordinates to deduce a more conventional post-Newtonian multipolar expansion of scalar and vector gravitational potentials of the rotating spheroid. We compare these expansions with that of the normal gravity field generated by the Kerr metric and demonstrate that the Kerr metric has a fairly limited application in relativistic geodesy as it does not match the normal gravity field of the Maclaurin ellipsoid already in the Newtonian limit. We derive the post-Newtonian generalization of the Somigliana formula for the normal gravity field measured on the surface of the rotating PN spheroid and employed in practical work for measuring the Earth gravitational field anomalies. Finally, we discuss the possible choice of the gauge-dependent parameters of the normal gravity field model for practical applications and compare it with the existing EGM2008 model of gravitational field.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
We remind that the associated Legendre functions of the imaginary argument, \(z=x+iy\), are defined for all z except at a cut line along the real axis, \(-1\le x\le 1\). The associated Legendre functions of a real argument are defined only on the cut line, \(-1\le x\le 1\) [69, Section 12.10].
- 3.
- 4.
Post-newtonian definitions of mass, center of mass, and other multipole moments can be found, for example, in [5].
- 5.
Notice that \(\mathcal{D}^z\not =0\) but we don’t need this component for calculating \(V^+\).
- 6.
Our method is partially overlapping with a similar development given in [10, Section 2.9].
- 7.
- 8.
For more details about the gauge transformations of the post-Newtonian spheroid the reader is referred to [3, Section 4].
- 9.
One should notice that in classic geodesy the Somigliana formula is usually expressed in terms of the geographic latitude \(\Phi \) on ellipsoid that is related to the ellipsoidal angle \(\theta \) by \(\theta =\beta -\pi /2\), and, \(a\tan \beta =b\tan \Phi \), [10, Eq. 2-77].
- 10.
For example, in case of a rigidly rotating homogeneous perfect fluid the relation, \(\epsilon =\epsilon (\rho ,\omega )\), is simply given by the Maclaurin formula (86).
References
S.M. Kopejkin, Relativistic manifestations of gravitational fields in gravimetry and geodesy. Manuscr. Geod. 16, 301–312 (1991)
S.M. Kopeikin, E.M. Mazurova, A.P. Karpik, Towards an exact relativistic theory of Earth’s geoid undulation. Phys. Lett. A 379, 1555–1562 (2015)
S.M. Kopeikin, Reference ellipsoid and geoid in chronometric geodesy. Front. Astron. Space Sci. 3(5), 5 (2016)
S. Kopeikin, W. Han, E. Mazurova, Post-Newtonian reference ellipsoid for relativistic geodesy. Phys. Rev. D 93(4), 044069 (2016)
S. Kopeikin, M. Efroimsky, G. Kaplan, Relativistic Celestial Mechanics of the Solar System (Wiley, Berlin, 2011), xxxii+860 pp
P. Vaníček, E.J. Krakiwsky, Geodesy, the Concepts, 2nd edn. (Amsterdam, North Holland, 1986), xv+697 pp
B. Hofmann-Wellenhof, H. Moritz, Physical Geodesy (Springer, Berlin, 2006)
W. Torge, J. Müller, Geodesy, 4th edn. (De Gruyter, Berlin, 2012), 433 pp
L.D. Landau, E.M. Lifshitz, The Classical Theory of Fields (Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1975), xiii+402 pp
W.A. Heiskanen, H. Moritz, Physical Geodesy (W. H. Freeman, San Francisco, 1967), 364 pp
G. Petit, B. Luzum, IERS conventions. IERS Tech. Note 36, 179 pp. (2010)
K. Sośnica, D. Thaller, A. Jäggi, R. Dach, G. Beutler, Sensitivity of Lageos orbits to global gravity field models. Artif. Satell. 47, 47–65 (2012)
P.L. Bender, R.S. Nerem, J.M. Wahr, Possible future use of laser gravity gradiometers. Space Sci. Rev. 108, 385–392 (2003)
N.K. Pavlis, S.A. Holmes, S.C. Kenyon, J.K. Factor, The development and evaluation of the Earth gravitational model 2008 (EGM2008). J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 117, B04406 (2012)
N.K. Pavlis, S.A. Holmes, S.C. Kenyon, J.K. Factor, Correction to “the development and evaluation of the Earth gravitational model 2008 (EGM2008)”. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 118, 2633–2633 (2013)
Fu Lee-Lueng, On the decadal trend of global mean sea level and its implication on ocean heat content change. Front. Mar. Sci. 3, 37 (2016)
H.-P. Plag, M. Pearlman (eds.), Global Geodetic Observing System (Springer, Dordrecht, 2009), 322 pp
L.-L. Fu, B.J. Haines, The challenges in long-term altimetry calibration for addressing the problem of global sea level change. Adv. Space Res. 51, 1284–1300 (2013)
Z. Altamimi, P. Rebischung, L. Métivier, X. Collilieux, ITRF2014: a new release of the international Terrestrial Reference Frame modeling nonlinear station motions. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 121, 6109–6131 (2016)
J. Müller, D. Dirkx, S.M. Kopeikin, G. Lion, I. Panet, G. Petit, P.N.A.M. Visser, High performance clocks and gravity field determination. Space Sci. Rev. 214(5), 1–31 (2018)
R. Bondarescu, M. Bondarescu, G. Hetényi, L. Boschi, P. Jetzer, J. Balakrishna, Geophysical applicability of atomic clocks: direct continental geoid mapping. Geophys. J. Int. 191, 78–82 (2012)
E. Mai, J. Müller, General remarks on the potential use of atomic clocks in relativistic geodesy. ZFV - Zeitschrift fur Geodasie, Geoinformation und Landmanagement 138(4), 257–266 (2013)
E. Mai, Time, atomic clocks, and relativistic geodesy. Report No 124, Deutsche Geodátische Kommission der Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften (DGK) (2014), 128 pp., http://dgk.badw.de/fileadmin/docs/a-124.pdf
E. Hackmann, C. Lämmerzahl, Generalized gravitomagnetic clock effect. Phys. Rev. D 90(4), 044059 (2014)
J.M. Cohen, B. Mashhoon, Standard clocks, interferometry, and gravitomagnetism. Phys. Lett. A 181, 353–358 (1993)
V.F. Fateev, S.M. Kopeikin, S.L. Pasynok, Effect of irregularities in the earth’s rotation on relativistic shifts in frequency and time of earthbound atomic clocks. Meas. Tech. 58, 647–654 (2015)
M. Soffel, S.A. Klioner, G. Petit, P. Wolf, S.M. Kopeikin, P. Bretagnon, V.A. Brumberg, N. Capitaine, T. Damour, T. Fukushima, B. Guinot, T.-Y. Huang, L. Lindegren, C. Ma, K. Nordtvedt, J.C. Ries, P.K. Seidelmann, D. Vokrouhlický, C.M. Will, C. Xu, The IAU 2000 resolutions for astrometry, celestial mechanics, and metrology in the relativistic framework: explanatory supplement. Astron. J. (USA) 126, 2687–2706 (2003)
M. Soffel, S. Kopeikin, W.-B. Han, Advanced relativistic VLBI model for geodesy. J. Geod. 91(7), 783–801 (2017)
V.A. Brumberg, S.M. Kopeikin, Relativistic equations of motion of the earth’s satellite in the geocentric frame of reference. Kinematika i Fizika Nebesnykh Tel 5, 3–8 (1989)
V.A. Brumberg, S.M. Kopejkin, Relativistic reference systems and motion of test bodies in the vicinity of the Earth. Nuovo Cim. B Ser. 103, 63–98 (1989)
T. Damour, M. Soffel, C. Xu, General-relativistic celestial mechanics. IV. Theory of satellite motion. Phys. Rev. D 49, 618–635 (1994)
A. San Miguel, Numerical integration of relativistic equations of motion for Earth satellites. Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron. 103, 17–30 (2009)
U. Kostić, M. Horvat, A. Gomboc, Relativistic positioning system in perturbed spacetime. Class. Quantum Gravity 32(21), 215004 (2015)
K.-M. Roh, B.-K. Choi, The effects of the IERS conventions (2010) on high precision orbit propagation. J. Astron. Space Sci. 31, 41–50 (2014)
K.-M. Roh, S.M. Kopeikin, J.-H. Cho, Numerical simulation of the post-Newtonian equations of motion for the near Earth satellite with an application to the LARES satellite. Adv. Space Res. 58, 2255–2268 (2016)
I. Ciufolini, E.C. Pavlis, A confirmation of the general relativistic prediction of the Lense-Thirring effect. Nature 431, 958–960 (2004)
I. Ciufolini, Dragging of inertial frames. Nature 449, 41–47 (2007)
I. Ciufolini, E.C. Pavlis, A. Paolozzi, J. Ries, R. Koenig, R. Matzner, G. Sindoni, K.H. Neumayer, Phenomenology of the lense-thirring effect in the solar system: measurement of frame-dragging with laser ranged satellites. New Astron. 17, 341–346 (2012)
V.G. Gurzadyan, I. Ciufolini, A. Paolozzi, A.L. Kashin, H.G. Khachatryan, S. Mirzoyan, G. Sindoni, Satellites testing general relativity: residuals versus perturbations. Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 26, 1741020 (2017)
K.S. Thorne, R.D. Blandford, Black holes and the origin of radio sources, in Extragalactic Radio Sources. IAU Symposium, vol. 97, ed. by D.S. Heeschen, C.M. Wade (1982), pp. 255–262
S. Chandrasekhar, Ellipsoidal Figures of Equilibrium (Yale University Press, New Haven, 1969), ix+252 pp
A.N. Petrov, S.M. Kopeikin, R.R. Lompay, B. Tekin, Metric Theories of Gravity: Perturbations and Conservation Laws (De Gruyter, Berlin, 2017), xxiv+597 pp
L. Blanchet, Gravitational radiation from post-Newtonian sources and inspiralling compact binaries. Living Rev. Relativ. 17, 2 (2014)
M. Soffel, F. Frutos, On the usefulness of relativistic space-times for the description of the Earth’s gravitational field. J. Geod. 90(12), 1345–1357 (2016)
D. Philipp, V. Perlick, D. Puetzfeld, E. Hackmann, C. Lämmerzahl, Definition of the relativistic geoid in terms of isochronometric surfaces. Phys. Rev. D 95(10), 104037 (2017)
M. Oltean, R.J. Epp, P.L. McGrath, R.B. Mann, Geoids in general relativity: geoid quasilocal frames. Class. Quantum Gravity 33(10), 105001 (2016)
K.D. Krori, P. Borgohain, Uniform-density cold neutron stars in general relativity. J. Phys. Math. Gen. 8, 512–520 (1975)
J. Ponce de León, Fluid spheres of uniform density in general relativity. J. Math. Phys. 27, 271–276 (1986)
L. Lindblom, Static uniform-density stars must be spherical in general relativity. J. Math. Phys. 29, 436–439 (1988)
J.N. Islam, Rotating Fields in General Relativity (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1985), 127 pp
E. Gourgoulhon, An introduction to the theory of rotating relativistic stars. Lectures Given at the Compstar 2010 School (Caen, 8–16 Feb 2010) (2010)
J.L. Friedman, N. Stergioulas, Rotating Relativistic Stars (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2013), 438 pp
S. Chandrasekhar, The post-Newtonian effects of general relativity on the equilibrium of uniformly rotating bodies. I. The Maclaurin spheroids and the virial theorem. Astrophys. J. 142, 1513–1518 (1965)
S. Chandrasekhar, The post-Newtonian effects of general relativity on the equilibrium of uniformly rotating bodies. II. The deformed figures of the Maclaurin spheroids. Astrophys. J. 147, 334–352 (1967)
N.P. Bondarenko, K.A. Pyragas, On the equilibrium figures of an ideal rotating liquid in the post-Newtonian approximation of general relativity. II: Maclaurin’s P-ellipsoid. Astrophys. Space Sci. 27, 453–466 (1974)
D. Petroff, Post-Newtonian Maclaurin spheroids to arbitrary order. Phys. Rev. D 68(10), 104029 (2003)
G.L. Clark, The gravitational field of a rotating nearly spherical body. Philos. Mag. 39(297), 747–778 (1948)
P. Teyssandier, Rotating stratified ellipsoids of revolution and their effects on the dragging of inertial frames. Phys. Rev. D 18, 1037–1046 (1978)
H. Cheng, G.-X. Song, C. Huang, The internal and external metrics of a rotating ellipsoid under post-Newtonianian approximation. Chin. Astron. Astrophys. 31, 192–204 (2007)
C.M. Will, Theory and Experiment in Gravitational Physics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1993), xi+396 pp
S. Kopeikin, I. Vlasov, Parametrized post-Newtonian theory of reference frames, multipolar expansions and equations of motion in the N-body problem. Phys. Rep. 400, 209–318 (2004)
M.H. Soffel, Relativity in Astrometry, Celestial Mechanics and Geodesy (Springer, Berlin, 1989), xiv+208 pp
V.A. Brumberg, Essential Relativistic Celestial Mechanics (Adam Hilger, Bristol, 1991), x+263 pp
A.D. Rendall, Convergent and divergent perturbation series and the post-Minkowskian approximation scheme. Class. Quantum Gravity 7(5), 803–812 (1990)
J. Müller, M. Soffel, S.A. Klioner, Geodesy and relativity. J. Geod. 82, 133–145 (2008)
V.A. Fock, The Theory of Space, Time and Gravitation, 2nd edn. (Macmillan, New York, 1964); Translated from the Russian by N. Kemmer, xii+448 pp
S. Weinberg, Gravitation and Cosmology: Principles and Applications of the General Theory of Relativity (Wiley, New York, 1972)
A.P. Lightman, W.H. Press, R.H. Price, S.A. Teukolsky, Problem Book in Relativity and Gravitation (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1975), xiv+603 pp
G.B. Arfken, H.J. Weber, Mathematical Methods for Physicists, 4th edn. (Academic Press, San Diego, 1995), xviii+1029 pp
E.W. Hobson, The Theory of Spherical and Elliptical Harmonics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1931), vi+500 pp
V. Pohánka, Gravitational field of the homogeneous rotational ellipsoidal body: a simple derivation and applications. Contrib. Geophys. Geod. 41, 117–157 (2011)
I.S. Gradshteyn, I.M. Ryzhik, in Table of Integrals, Series and Products, 4th edn., ed. by Y.V. Geronimus, M.Y. Tseytlin (Academic Press, New York, 1965); First appeared in 1942 as MT15 in the Mathematical tables series of the National Bureau of Standards
I. Ciufolini, J.A. Wheeler, Gravitation and Inertia (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1995), 512 pp
S.M. Kopeikin, Gravitomagnetism and the speed of gravity. Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 15, 305–320 (2006)
S.M. Kopeikin, The gravitomagnetic influence on Earth-orbiting spacecrafts and on the lunar orbit, in General Relativity and John Archibald Wheeler, vol. 367, Astrophysics and Space Science Library, ed. by I. Ciufolini, R.A.A. Matzner (Springer, Berlin, 2010)
B.H. Hager, M.A. Richards, Long-wavelength variations in Earth’s geoid - physical models and dynamical implications. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A 328, 309–327 (1989)
J.-L. Tassoul, Theory of Rotating Stars (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1979), xvi+508 pp
P. Pizzetti, Principii della teoria meccanica della figura dei pianeti (E. Spoerri, Pisa, 1913), xiii+251 pp
R.O. Hansen, Multipole moments of stationary space-times. J. Math. Phys. 15, 46–52 (1974)
K.S. Thorne, Multipole expansions of gravitational radiation. Rev. Mod. Phys. 52, 299–339 (1980)
L. Blanchet, T. Damour, Radiative gravitational fields in general relativity. I - general structure of the field outside the source. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A 320, 379–430 (1986)
H. Quevedo, Multipole moments in general relativity - static and stationary vacuum solutions. Fortschritte der Physik 38, 733–840 (1990)
T. Damour, B.R. Iyer, Multipole analysis for electromagnetism and linearized gravity with irreducible Cartesian tensors. Phys. Rev. D 43, 3259–3272 (1991)
L. Blanchet, On the multipole expansion of the gravitational field. Class. Quantum Gravity 15, 1971–1999 (1998)
C. Jekeli, The exact transformation between ellipsoidal and spherical harmonic expansions. Manuscr. Geod. 13, 106–113 (1988)
C. Snow, Hypergeometric and Legendre Functions with Applications to Integral Equations of Potential Theory, 2nd edn. (US Government Printing Office, Washington, 1952), xi+427 pp
M. Soffel, R. Langhans, Space-Time Reference Systems (Springer, Berlin, 2013), xiv+314 pp
S. Chandrasekhar, J.C. Miller, On slowly rotating homogeneous masses in general relativity. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 167, 63–80 (1974)
J.M. Bardeen, A reexamination of the post-Newtonian Maclaurin spheroids. Astrophys. J. 167, 425 (1971)
R. Meinel, M. Ansorg, A. Kleinwächter, G. Neugebauer, D. Petroff, Relativistic Figures of Equilibrium (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2008), p. ix+218 pp
H. Stephani, D. Kramer, M. MacCallum, C. Hoenselaers, E. Herlt, Exact Solutions of Einstein’s Field Equations, 2nd edn. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2003), xxix+701 pp
W.C. Hernandez, Material sources for the Kerr metric. Phys. Rev. 159, 1070–1072 (1967)
J.L. Hernandez-Pastora, L. Herrera, Interior solution for the Kerr metric. Phys. Rev. D 95(2), 024003 (2017)
C. Jiang, W. Lin, Harmonic metric for Kerr black hole and its post-Newtonian approximation. Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 46, 1671 (2014)
W. Lin, C. Jiang, Exact and unique metric for Kerr-Newman black hole in harmonic coordinates. Phys. Rev. D 89(8), 087502 (2014)
H. Essén, The physics of rotational flattening and the point core model. Int. J. Geosci. 5, 555–570 (2014)
A. Krasinski, Ellipsoidal space-times, sources for the Kerr metric. Ann. Phys. 112, 22–40 (1978)
T. Wolf, G. Neugebauer, About the non-existence of perfect fluid bodies with the Kerr metric outside. Class. Quantum Gravity 9, L37–L42 (1992)
C. Bambi, Black Holes: A Laboratory for Testing Strong Gravity (Springer, Singapore, 2017), xv+340 pp
Acknowledgements
I thank Physikzentrum Bad Honnef for hospitality and Wilhelm and Else Heraeus Stiftung for providing generous travel support to deliver a talk at 609 WE-Heraeus-Seminar “Relativistic Geodesy: Foundations and Applications” (13.03. - 19.03.2016). This work contributes to the research project “Spacetime Metrology, Clocks and Relativistic Geodesy” [http://www.issibern.ch/teams/spacetimemetrology/] sponsored by the International Space Science Institute (ISSI) in Bern, Switzerland.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kopeikin, S. (2019). Reference-Ellipsoid and Normal Gravity Field in Post-Newtonian Geodesy. In: Puetzfeld, D., Lämmerzahl, C. (eds) Relativistic Geodesy. Fundamental Theories of Physics, vol 196. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11500-5_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11500-5_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-11499-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-11500-5
eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)