Abstract
The increased use of information systems (IS) has led to a number of changes in the workflow of the private and public sectors; they play a vital role when they are reliable and of high quality. The quality of the information systems plays a decisive role in the success of the system, and the best performance of the organization depends on the successful implementation of the IS. The quality and success of the information system have been widely discussed over the past two decades. As systems and technologies are improved and developed, researchers and practitioners have debated debates about their effectiveness and evaluation. In addition to the major concern about the effectiveness of information systems, the factors influencing the efficiency of information systems are also important. Several researchers have created models for measuring quality and the success of the information system [1, 2]; highlighting the need for better and more consistent success factors. However, several authors claim that there are several measures of success of an IS, which generates a certain amount of confusion, especially since there are few recognized criteria for choosing indicators of success [3], These same authors add that the current measuring instruments of IS’s success rest on poor theoretical foundations. To this end, our contribution in this paper is to propose a new holistic model that brings together several factors (technological, organizational, human and change management) to measure the quality and success of an information system, and to apply the AHP multicriteria prioritization method for the selection and prioritization of these criteria.
Keywords
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Petter, S., DeLone, W., McLean, E.: Measuring information systems success: Models, dimensions, measures, and interrelationships. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. (2008)
Seddon, P.B.: A respecification and extension of the DeLone and McLean model of IS success. Inf. Syst. Res. 8(3), 240–253 (1997)
Seddon, P.B., Staples, S., Patnayakuni, R.: Dimensions of information systems success. Commun. AIS. 2(61) (1999)
Autissier, D., Delaye, V.: Mesurer la performance du système d’information. Eyrolles. (2008)
Keen, P.G.W.: Information systems and organizational change. Commun. ACM 24(1), 24–33 (1981)
Gable, G.G., Sedera, D., Chan, T.: Enterprise systems success: a measurement model. (2003)
DeLone, W.H., McLean, E.R.: The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: a ten-year update. J. Manage. Info. Syst. (2003)
Holden, R.J., Karsh, B.-T.: The technology acceptance model: its past and its future in health care. J Biomed Inf. (2010)
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M., Davis, G., Davis, F.: User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view, MIS Q. (2003)
Bhattacherjee, A.: Understanding information systems continuance: an expectation-confirmation model, MIS Q. (2001)
Iivari, J.: An empirical test of the DeLone-McLean model of information system success. Database Adv. Inf. Syst. 36(2), 8–27 (2005)
DeLone, W.H., McLean, E.R.: Information systems success: the quest for the dependent variable. Inf. Syst. Res. 3(1), 60–95 (1992)
Brown, T.J., Churchill, G.A., Peter, J.P.: Improving the measurement of service quality. J. Retail. 69(1), 127–139 (1993)
Kettinger, W.J., Lee, C.C.: Pragmatic perspectives on the measurement of information systems service quality. MIS Q. 21(2), 223–240 (1997)
Pitt, L.F., Watson, R.T., Kavan, C.B.: Service quality: a measure of information systems effectiveness. MIS Q. 19(2), 173–187 (1995)
Kettinger, W., Lee, C.: Perceived service quality and user satisfaction with the information services function. Decis. Sci. 25(5–6), 737–766 (1994)
van Dyke, T.P., Kappelman, L.A., Prybutok, V.R.: Measuring information systems service quality: concerns on the use of the SERVQUAL questionnaire. MIS Q. 21(2), 195 (1997)
DeLone, W.H., Mclean, E.R.: The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: a ten-year update. J. Manage. Inf. Syst./ Spring 19(4), 9–30 (2003)
Hutchison, D.: Future Data and Security Engineering (2015)
Eds, V.A., Ferrari, D.: Context-aware systems and applications (2015)
Lai, P.C.: The literature review of technology adoption models and theories for the novelty technology, JISTEM-J. Inf. Syst. Technol. Manage, 14(1): 21–38
Davis, F.D., Bagozzi, R.P., Warshaw, P.R.: User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Manage. Sci. 35(8), 982–1003 (1989)
Mugo, D.G., Njagi, K., Chemwei, B., Motanya, J.O., Li, F.: Jama Raiyn Al-Qasemi, Academic College of Education, Baqa Al Qarbiah, Israel. (3) A. Balavivekanandhan, Anna University, India. (4) Nafsaniath Fathema. Br. J. Math. Comput. Sci. 20(4), 1–8 (2017)
Argyropoulou, M., Reid, I., George, L.: Quality, reporting and organisational performance (2015)
DeLone, W.H., McLean, E.R.: The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: a ten-year update. J. Manage. Inf. Syst. 19(4), 9–30 (2003)
Bailey, J.E., Pearson, S.W.: Development of a tool for measuring and analyzing computer user satisfaction. Manage. Sci. 29(5), 530–545 (1983)
Pitt, L., Watson, R., Kavan, C.: Service quality: a measure of information systems effectiveness. Manage. Inf. Syst. Q. 19(2), 173–187 (1995)
Jarvenpaa, S.L., Ives, B.: Executive involvement and participation in the management of information technology. MIS Q. 15(2), 205 (1991)
Teo, T.S.H., King, W.R.: An empirical study of the impacts of integrating business planning and information systems planning. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 8(3), 200–210 (1999)
Saunders, C.S., Jones, J.W.: Measuring performance of the information systems function. J. Manage. Inf. Syst. 8(4), 63–82 (1992)
Ein-Dor, P., Segev, E.: Managing management information systems. Lexington Books (1978)
Brancheau, J., Janz, B., Wetherbe, J.: Key issues in information systems management: 1994–1995 SIM delphi results, Manage. Inf. Syst. Q, 20(2) (1996)
Aldag, R.J., Timothy, M.S.: Management. College Division, South-Western Pub. Co (1991)
Chapanis, A.: Human factors in systems engineering. Wiley, (1996)
“Théorie unifiée de l’acceptation et de l’utilisation de la technologie (Venkatesh et al.,… | Télécharger le schéma scientifique.” [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Unified-theory-of-acceptance-and-use-of-technology-Venkatesh-et-al-2003_fig4_257921834
Doll, W.J., Torkzadeh, G.: The Measurement of End-User Computing Satisfaction, MIS Q. (1988)
Chen, C.H., Tzeng, G.H.: Creating the aspired intelligent assessment systems for teaching materials, Expert Syst. Appl. (2011)
Autissier, D., Moutot, M.: Méthode de conduite du changement Diagnostic Accompagment Pilotage 3 e édition Des mêmes auteurs. (2009)
Saaty, T.L.: The analytic hierarchy process. McGraw-Hill, New York (1980)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Benmoussa, K., Laaziri, M., Khoulji, S., Kerkeb, M.L. (2019). Enhanced Model for Measuring Information Systems Success. In: Ben Ahmed, M., Boudhir, A., Younes, A. (eds) Innovations in Smart Cities Applications Edition 2. SCA 2018. Lecture Notes in Intelligent Transportation and Infrastructure. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11196-0_59
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11196-0_59
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-11195-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-11196-0
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)