Skip to main content

An Investigation of the Feasibility of the Use of Gels and Emulsions in Cleaning of Gilded Wooden Surfaces. Part A: Removal of Brass-Based Overpainting

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Cultural Heritage Science ((CUHESC))

Abstract

The term ‘cleaning of gilded wooden surfaces’ should be understood broadly to account for their complexity. Each layer of a gilded surface requires assessment, and often, a separate cleaning methodology. Removal of overpainting is a part of the surface cleaning process of gilded wood. Many cleaning methods for gilded surfaces were adopted from other conservation fields, as there is little research in reference to cleaning of gilded wood. Two case studies involving nineteenth century gilded frames, focused on finding a suitable gel and application method to remove brass-based overpainting and surface dirt. This paper presents the findings from our investigation in regards to brass-based overpainting removal (Part A). The results of experiments into removal of soiling from gilded wooden surfaces are covered in a second paper (Part B). Two rigid gels reviewed in conservation literature were tested for removing brass-based overpainting from oil-gilded surfaces: Xanthan gum gel and poly(vinyl alcohol)-borax gel (PVOH-borax gel). Low-viscosity emulsions based on Pemulen TR-2 were also tested as they involve more straightforward clearing process than with viscous gels. Gels were evaluated according to application and removal methods, viscosity, texture, and cleaning efficiency. Rigid solvent gels and low-viscosity emulsions offer a viable alternative to free solvent application provided they can be easily removed from the surface, with minimal clearing requirements. Factors influencing the performance of gel systems include the thickness of the overpainting layers, the presence of a ‘barrier layer’ between the overpainting and gilding, the solubility of the overpainting binder, and the solubility characteristics of the solvent (its rate and power of swelling, evaporation rate and application method). For the removal of overpainting from gilded wooden surfaces, fast-acting solvents with moderate swelling power are more appropriate than slow-acting solvents with strong swelling power. The latter can soften gilding layers beneath the overpainting. Important factor to consider are solvent volatility and the rate it diffuses into the overpainting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    FTIR spectra were collected using a Thermo Nicolet Nexus spectrometer attached to a Continuum IR microscope and MCT-A detector with KBr window (11700–600 cm−1). The spectra were recorded in the range of 4000–550 cm−1 using 16 scans at 4 cm−1 resolution. A micro-compression cell with diamond window was used as a sample platform and samples were rolled flat with a FTIR roller prior to analysis.

References

  1. Angelova, L.V., Berrie, B.H., de Ghetaldi, K., Kerr A. and Weiss, R.G. 2015. Partially hydrolyzed poly(vinyl acetate)-borax-based gel-like materilas for conservation of art: characterisation and applications. Studies in Conservation 60:227–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Angelova, L.V., Carretti, E., Berrie, B.H. and Weiss, R.G. 2017. Poly(vinyl alcohol)-borax 'gels': a flexible cleaning option. In Angelova, L.V., Ormsby, B., Townsend, J.H. and Wolbers, R, (eds) 1917. Gels in the Conservation of Art. Archetype Publications Ltd: 231–236.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Angelova, L.V., Ormsby, B., Townsend, J.H. and Wolbers, R. (eds) 1917. Gels in the Conservation of Art. Archetype Publications Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Doherty, E., and Rivers, S. 2017. The removal of lead- and oil-based overpaint from a plaster cast of Hermes Fastening his Sandal. In Angelova, L.V., Ormsby, B., Townsend, J.H. and Wolbers, R, (eds) 1917. Gels in the Conservation of Art. Archetype Publications Ltd: 121–126.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cakic, S., Raskovic, L., Lacnjevac, C., Rajkovic, M., Barac, M. and Stojanovic, M., 2007. Physical-Mechanical Properties of Nitrodopes Affected by Ultra-Violet Radiation. Sensors ISSN1424-8220: MDPI; www.mdpi.org/sensors 2007, 7:2139–2156.

  6. Giacomucci, L., F. Toja, P. Sammartin, L. Toniolo, B. Prieto, F. Vila, and F. Cappitelli, 2012. Degradation of nitrocellulose-based paint by Desulfovibrio desulfuricans ATCC13541. Biodegradation 23:705–716

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hackney, S., 2013. The Art and Science of Cleaning Paintings. In Mecklenburg, M. F., Charola, A. E., and Koestler, R. J., 2013. New Insights into the Cleaning of Paintings. Proceedings from the Cleaning 2010 International Conference, Universidad Politecnica de Valencia and Museum Conservation Institute, Smithsonian Institution Scholarly Press, Washington, D.C.: 11–15.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kovalenko, V.I., Mukhamadeeva, R.M., Maklakova, L.N. and Gustova, N.G., 1994. Interpretation of the IR Spectrum and Structure of Cellulose Nitrate. Journal of Structural Chemistry, July 1994; https://www.researchgate.net/publication/243955019

  9. Learner, T.J.S. 2004. Analysis of modern paints. Los Angeles, CA: Getty Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lins, Andrew, 1991. Basic Physical Properties of Gold Leaf. Bigelow, D., Cornu, E., Landrey, G. J., Van Horne, C., (editors), 1991, Gilded Wood: Conservation and History. Sound View Press, Madison, Connecticut: 17–23.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mansmann, K. 1998. Oberflächenreinigung mit Ammoniumcitraten. Zeitschrift für Kunsttechnologie und Konservierung, 12(2):220–237.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mecklenburg, M. F., Tumosa, C. S. and Vicenzi, E. P, 2013a. The Influence of Pigments and Ion Migration on the Durability of Drying Oil and Alkyd Paints. In Mecklenburg, M. F., Charola, A. E., and Koestler, R. J., 2013. New Insights into the Cleaning of Paintings. Proceedings from the Cleaning 2010 International Conference, Universidad Politecnica de Valencia and Museum Conservation Institute, Smithsonian Institution Scholarly Press, Washington, D.C.: 59–67.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mecklenburg, M. F., Charola, A. E., and Koestler, R. J., 2013b. New Insights into the Cleaning of Paintings. Proceedings from the Cleaning 2010 International Conference, Universidad Politecnica de Valencia and Museum Conservation Institute, Smithsonian Institution Scholarly Press, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Michalski, S., 1990. A physical model of the cleaning of oil paint. In Mills, J.S. and Smith, P., eds, Cleaning, Retouching and Coatings. Technology and Practice for Easel Paintings and Polychrome Sculpture. Preprints of the Contributions to the Brussels Congress, International Institute for Conservation of Historic and Artistic Works, London, 1990, pp. 85–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Noake, E., Lau D., and Nel, P. 2017. Identification of Cellulose Nitrate Based Adhesive Repairs in Archeological Pottery of the University of Melbourne’s Middle Eastern Archaeological Pottery Collection Using Portable FTIR-ATR Spectroscopy and PCA. Heritage Science 5:3 Springer Open Access: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40494-016-0116-z

  16. Noble, P., and J. J. Boon. 2007. Metal Soap Degradation of Oil Paintings: Aggregates, Increased Transparency and Efflorescence. AIC Paintings Specialty Group Postprints, 19:1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Phenix, A., 2013. Effects of Organic Solvents on Artists’ Oil Paint Films: Swelling. In: Mecklenburg, M. F., Charola, A. E., and Koestler, R. J. New Insights into the Cleaning of Paintings. Proceedings from the Cleaning 2010 International Conference, Universidad Politecnica de Valencia and Museum Conservation Institute, Smithsonian Institution Scholarly Press, Washington, D.C.: 69–76

    Google Scholar 

  18. Phenix, A., and A. Burnstock. 1992. The Removal of Surface Dirt on Paintings with Chelating Agents. The Conservator, 16:28–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/01400096.1992.9635624.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Phenix, A. 2002. The Swelling of Artists’ Paints in Organic Solvents. Part 2, Comparative Swelling Powers of Selected Organic Solvents and Solvent Mixtures. Journal of the American Institute for Conservation, 41:61–90. https://doi.org/10.2307/3179897

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Phenix, A., and K. Sutherland. 2001. The Cleaning of Paintings: Effects of Organic Solvents on Oil Paint Films. Reviews in Conservation, 2:47–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Riedo, C., Caldera, F., Poli, T., and Chiantore, O., 2015. Poly(vinyl alcohol)-borate hydrogels with improved features for the cleaning of cultural heritage surfaces. Heritage Science 3(1): 23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Sawicki, M., Rouse, E. and Limoges, S. 2017. Formation of metal soaps on brass-based coated frames: Nitrocellulose revisited. In: ICOM-CC 18th Triennial Conference Preprints, Copenhagen, 4–8 September 2017, ed. J. Bridgland, art. 2104. Paris: International Council of Museums.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Schilling, M., Khanjian, H. and Carson, D., 1997. Fatty acid and glycerol content of lipids; effects of ageing and solvent extraction on the composition of oil paints. Techne 5, pp. 71–8.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Selwitz, C.M., 1988. Cellulose nitrate in conservation. The Getty Conservation Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Stavroudis, C., 2016. Cleaning of Acrylic Painted Surfaces, July 12–15, 2016, The John and Mable Ringling Museum of Art, Sarasota, Florida. MCP Recipes. The Getty Conservation Institute: https://www.getty.edu/conservation/our_projects/education/caps/modular_cleaning_recipes.pdf

  26. Stavroudis, C., 2017. Gels: evolution in practice. In: Angelova, L.V., Ormsby, B., Townsend, J.H. and Wolbers, R, (eds) 1917. Gels in the Conservation of Art. Archetype Publications Ltd: 209–217.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Sutherland, K. 2000. The Extraction of Soluble Components from an Oil Paint Film by a Varnish Solution. Studies in Conservation, 45:54–62. https://doi.org/10.2307/1506683

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Tumosa, C., Millard, J., Erhardt, D. and Mecklenburg, M., 1999. Effects of solvents on physical properties of paint films. ICOM Committee for Conservation, 12th Triennial Meeting, Lyon, pp. 347–52.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Victorian Watercolours from the Art Gallery of NSW, 2017. [Exhibition]. The Art Gallery of NSW 2 June – 3 Dec 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Wolbers, C.R., Sterman, N. T. and Stavroudis, C. 1990. Notes for Workshop in New Methods in the Cleaning of Paintings. The Getty Conservation Institute, August 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Wolbers, R., 2017. Terminology and properties of selected gels. In: Angelova, L.V., Ormsby, B., Townsend, J.H. and Wolbers, R, (eds) 1917. Gels in the Conservation of Art. Archetype Publications Ltd: 381–294.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Malgorzata Sawicki .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix

Appendix

Description of the solvent systems preparation included in the tests:

  1. A.

    2% Pemulen TR2-TEA, pH 6.5 (stock solution) was formed according to the MCP recipe [25] as follows:

    5 g Pemulen TR2 was mixed with 90 ml of deionised water; around 4.5 ml of TEA was added to adjust pH to 6.5 (little bit more for pH 8); then another 150 ml was incorporated to achieve a stock gel of ~2%.

    1% Pemulen TR2-TEA, pH 6.5, was formed according to the Chris Stavroudis’ instructions on YouTube:

    5 ml of the 2% Pemulen TR2 stock solution was mixed with 2 ml citric system pH 6.5 (see below) and 3 ml deionised water on the magnetic plate with stirrer. The final mixture was 10 ml of 1% Pemulen TR2-TEA-citric system, pH 6.5.

  2. B.

    Citric system: Citric acid with Triethanolamine, pH 6,5

    4,8 g citric acid was mixed with 70 ml of deionized water. Triethanolamine was added to adjust pH to 6,5 (approx. 4.5 ml) then an extra 20 ml of deionised water was added to make entire solution approx. 100 ml.

Emulsions:

  1. C.

    1% Pemulen TR2-TEA, pH 6.5, + 10% (20%, 30%) benzyl alcohol was formed according to Chris Stavroudis instructions on the GCI YouTube channel:

    5 ml of the 2% Pemulen TR2 stock solution was mixed with 2 ml citric system pH 6.5 (see above) and 3 ml deionised water on a magnetic plate with a stirrer. After approx. 5 min 1 ml (2 ml, 3 ml) benzyl alcohol was added and stirred again to form ~10% (~20%, ~30%) emulsion.

  2. D.

    1% Pemulen TR2-TEA pH 6.5 + ~10%, (20%, 30%) benzyl alcohol + ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) pH 6,5 was formulated with influence of Chris Stavroudis MCP (as above):

    5 ml of the 2% Pemulen TR2 stock solution was mixed with 2 ml of EDTA (5%) (replacement of citric system) and 3 ml deionised water on the magnetic plate with stirrer. 5 min later 1 ml (2 ml, 3 ml) of benzyl alcohol was added to form ~10% (~20%, ~30%) benzyl alcohol emulsion.

  3. E.

    PVOH-Borax gels with acetone were prepared as follow ([1], p. 243).

    90:10: For ~10 g batch, 0.6 g 75PVOH was solved in 6.37 g deionised water and 0.94 g solvent (acetone) at a moderate temperature ~50 °C for approx. 1 h. In a separate container 0.1 g borax (Bare Essentials Borax) was solved in 2 g of deionised water. Borax solution was added to PVOH mixture using magnetic stirrer until combined.

    50:50: For ~20 g batch: 1 g 75PVOH was solved in 5.4 g deionised water and 9.4 g solvent (acetone) at ~50 °C for approx. 1 h, before adding the borax-water solution (0.2 g borax solved in 4 g deionised water).

  4. F.

    8% Xanthan gum stock gel was prepared by mixing 8 g of powder with 20 ml of deionised water, pH 7, and then top up with deionised water up to the final volume of 100 ml.

    4% w/v Xanthan gum gel was used for all experiments.

    For 25% solvent gel 25 ml of solvent was mixed with 25 ml of distilled water, pH 7, added to 50 ml of stock gel and stirred.

    For 30% solvent gel 30 ml of solvent was mixed with 20 ml of distilled water, pH 7, added to 50 ml of stock gel and stirred.

    For 50% solvent gel 50 ml of solvent was mixed 50 ml of stock gel and stirred.

    Xanthan gum, with 20% benzyl alcohol 5% EDTA, pH 7, was prepared basing on an article by Doherty and Rivers 2017, p. 123.

    10% EDTA stock solution was prepared by mixing 10 g EDTA in 100 ml distilled water, buffered with TEA to pH 7.

    To make gel 50 ml EDTA (10%) was mixed with 30 ml of distilled water, pH 7, and 20 ml benzyl alcohol, and then 4 g of Xanthan powder and stirred with magnetic stirrer.

  5. G.

    Acetone poultices were prepared as follows:

    Large cotton bandage was folded to form patches; the size was determined by the area designated for treatment. The pocket was packed with cotton wool and saturated with solvent. During treatment, the poultice is covered with polyethylene sheet, to reduce evaporation. The poultice can be removed from the surface anytime and the treatment terminated immediately.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Sawicki, M., Rouse, E., Bianco, S.L., Kautto, S. (2019). An Investigation of the Feasibility of the Use of Gels and Emulsions in Cleaning of Gilded Wooden Surfaces. Part A: Removal of Brass-Based Overpainting. In: Nevin, A., Sawicki, M. (eds) Heritage Wood. Cultural Heritage Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11054-3_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics