Skip to main content

Routing Game with Nonseparable Costs for EV Driving and Charging Incentive Design

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Network Games, Control, and Optimization

Abstract

Designing optimal incentive mechanisms for electric vehicles is an important challenge nowadays. In fact, this new type of vehicle influences several parts of society, at the transport level through congestion/pollution and at the energy level. In this paper, we consider the design of driving and charging optimal incentive through a routing game approach with multiple types of vehicles: gasoline and electric. We show that the game is not standard and needs a particular framework. We are able to prove the existence of a Wardrop equilibrium of this routing game with nonseparable costs, due to interaction through the energy cost. Our analysis is applied to a particular transportation network in which two paths are possible for vehicles, mainly one through the city center and another one outside. A fully characterization of Wardrop equilibrium is proposed, and optimal tolls are computed in order to minimize an environmental cost. Numerical results are provided on real data of electricity consumptions in France and in Texas, USA.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See, e.g., the case of “Ile-de-France,” compared to France where the current number of EV in circulation is around 150 000 http://www.automobile-propre.com/dossiers/voitures-electriques/chiffres-vente-immatriculations-france/ when the total number of French vehicles of around 39 millions.

  2. 2.

    Such incentive mechanism is already applied in practice, in metropolis like London (https://tfl.gov.uk/modes/driving/congestion-charge).

  3. 3.

    Costs functions are separable if \(c(x)=c_a(x_a)\) for all arc a, \(x_a\) being the flow on a.

  4. 4.

    It does not include dynamic or locational effects.

  5. 5.

    For greater details of the proofs, please visit https://sites.google.com/site/olivierbeaudes-homepage/olivier-beaude-publications.

  6. 6.

    Data are available at https://www.enedis.fr/coefficients-des-profils.

  7. 7.

    Data are available at http://www.pecanstreet.org/.

  8. 8.

    ENTD \(=\) Enquête Nationale Transports et Déplacements (in French).

  9. 9.

    http://www.strategie.gouv.fr/sites/strategie.gouv.fr/files/archives/Valeur-du-temps.pdf.

References

  1. E. Altman and H. Kameda. Equilibria for multiclass routing problems in multi-agent networks. Dynamic Games and Applications, 7:343–367, 2005.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. M. Brenna, M. Falvo, F. Foiadelli, L. Martirano, F. Massaro, D. Poli, and A. Vaccaro. Challenges in energy systems for the smart-cities of the future. In Energy Conference and Exhibition, 2012 IEEE International, pages 755–762, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  3. C. Chau and K. Sim. The price of anarchy for non-atomic congestion games with symmetric cost maps and elastic demands. Operations Research Letters, 31, 2003.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. J. Correa, A. Schulz, and N. Stier-Moses. A geometric approach to the price of anarchy in nonatomic congestion games. Games and Economic Behavior, 64:457–469, 2008.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. S. Dafermos. The traffic assignment problem for multiclass-user transportation networks. Transportation Science, 6(1):73–87, 1972.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. M. Florian and D. Hearn. Network equilibrium models and algorithms. Network routing, pages 485–550, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  7. S. Han, S. Han, and K. Sezaki. Development of an optimal vehicle-to-grid aggregator for frequency regulation. IEEE Transactions on smart grid, 1(1):65–72, 2010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. A. Ipakchi and F. Albuyeh. Grid of the future. IEEE power and energy magazine, 7(2):52–62, 2009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. M. Jeihani, S. Lawe, and J. Connolly. Improving traffic assignment model using intersection delay function. 47th Annual Transportation Research Forum, New York, New York, March 23–25, 2006 208046, Mar. 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  10. N. Jiang and C. Xie. Computing and analysing mixed equilibrium network flows with gasoline and electric vehicles. Computer-aided civil and infrastructure engineering, 29(8):626–641, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  11. L. Kleinrock. Queueing systems. Wiley Interscience, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  12. A. Y. Lam, Y.-W. Leung, and X. Chu. Electric vehicle charging station placement: Formulation, complexity, and solutions. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 5(6):2846–2856, 2014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. A.-H. Mohsenian-Rad, V. W. Wong, J. Jatskevich, R. Schober, and A. Leon-Garcia. Autonomous demand-side management based on game-theoretic energy consumption scheduling for the future smart grid. IEEE transactions on Smart Grid, 1(3):320–331, 2010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. B. of Public Roads. Traffic assignment manual. Technical report, U.S. Department of Commerce, Urban Planning Division; 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  15. M. Patriksson. The Traffic Assignment Problem: Models and Methods. Dover Publications, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  16. G. Perakis. The price of anarchy when costs are non-separable and asymmetric. proccedings of IPCO, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  17. T. Roughgarden and E. Tardos. How bad is selfish routing. in proceedings of FOCS, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Y. Sheffi. Urban transportation networks: Equilibrium analysis with mathematical programming methods. Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  19. J. Tan and L. Wang. Real-time charging navigation of electric vehicles to fast charging stations: A hierarchical game approach. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 8(2):846–856, 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  20. J. Wardrop. Some theoretical aspects of road traffic research. Proc Inst Civ Eng Part II, 1:325–278, 1952.

    Google Scholar 

  21. W. Wei, S. Mei, L. Wu, M. Shahidehpour, and Y. Fang. Optimal traffic-power flow in urban electrified transportation networks. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 8(1):84–95, 2017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Benoît Sohet .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Sohet, B., Beaude, O., Hayel, Y. (2019). Routing Game with Nonseparable Costs for EV Driving and Charging Incentive Design. In: Walrand, J., Zhu, Q., Hayel, Y., Jimenez, T. (eds) Network Games, Control, and Optimization. Static & Dynamic Game Theory: Foundations & Applications. Birkhäuser, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10880-9_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics