Skip to main content

Taxonomic Supertree Construction with Incertae sedis Taxa

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Bioinformatics and Phylogenetics

Part of the book series: Computational Biology ((COBO,volume 29))

Abstract

A supertree method is a form of meta-analysis. It combines phylogenetic tree estimates, which typically include only a subset of the species of interest, into a single tree that includes every species found in any input tree. These methods are usually applied to phylogenetic estimates that only have taxonomic labels at their leaves. Taxonomies are another source of information about phylogenetic relationships. They usually convey names for groups of species in addition to species names. If a taxonomy places every species, then its phylogenetic information can be fully expressed as a tree. Such a taxonomy could easily serve as one of the inputs to a supertree method. However, most taxonomies contain incertae sedis taxa, which are species or groups of species that have an uncertain placement within the taxonomic hierarchy. Here, we review some principles of building trees from splits and describe a supertree method that is able to handle incertae sedis taxa without losing taxon names.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Adams III, E.N.: Consensus techniques and the comparison of taxonomic trees. Syst. Biol. 21(4), 390–397 (1972). https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/21.4.390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Aho, A.V., Sagiv, Y., Szymanski, T.G., Ullman, J.D.: Inferring a tree from lowest common ancestors with an application to the optimization of relational expressions. SIAM J. Comput. 10(3), 405–421 (1981)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Baum, B.R.: Combining trees as a way of combining data sets for phylogenetic inference, and the desirability of combining gene trees. Taxon 41, 3–10 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. de Queiroz, K.: Nodes, branches, and phylogenetic definitions. Syst. Biol. 62(4), 625–632 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syt027. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syt027

  5. Dress, A., Huber, K.T., Koolen, J., Moulton, V., Spillner, A.: Basic Phylogenetic Combinatorics. Cambridge University Press (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hinchliff, C.E., Smith, S.A., Allman, J.F., Burleigh, J.G., Chaudhary, R., Coghill, L.M., Crandall, K.A., Deng, J., Drew, B.T., Gazis, R., Gude, K., Hibbett, D.S., Katz, L.A., Laughinghouse, H.D., McTavish, E.J., Midford, P.E., Owen, C.L., Ree, R.H., Rees, J.A., Soltis, D.E., Williams, T., Cranston, K.A.: Synthesis of phylogeny and taxonomy into a comprehensive tree of life. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 112(41), 12,764–12,769 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1423041112. http://www.pnas.org/content/112/41/12764.abstract

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hörandl, E., Stuessy, T.F.: Paraphyletic groups as natural units of biological classification. Taxon 59(6), 1641–1653 (2010). http://www.jstor.org/stable/41059863

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. McTavish, E.J., Hinchliff, C.E., Allman, J.F., Brown, J.W., Cranston, K.A., Holder, M.T., Rees, J.A., Smith, S.A.: Phylesystem: a git-based data store for community-curated phylogenetic estimates. Bioinformatics btv276 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ragan, M.A.: Phylogenetic inference based on matrix representation of trees. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 1(1), 53–58 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Redelings, B.D., Holder, M.T.: A supertree pipeline for summarizing phylogenetic and taxonomic information for millions of species. PeerJ 5, e3058 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Rees, J.A., Cranston, K.: Automated assembly of a reference taxonomy for phylogenetic data synthesis. Biodivers. Data J. 5(5), e12581 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Wilkinson, M.: Common cladistic information and its consensus representation: reduced adams and reduced cladistic consensus trees and profiles. Syst. Biol. 43(3), 343–368 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Dr. Karen Cranston for comments and the NSF (awards 1759838 and 1208393) for funding. MTH would like to thank Dr. Bernard Moret. Dr. Moret’s leadership of the CIPRES project was crucial to MTH’s early career, and Dr. Moret’s career consistently served as an inspiring example of integrating the discipline of computer science with evolutionary biology.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark T. Holder .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Redelings, B.D., Holder, M.T. (2019). Taxonomic Supertree Construction with Incertae sedis Taxa. In: Warnow, T. (eds) Bioinformatics and Phylogenetics. Computational Biology, vol 29. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10837-3_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10837-3_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-10836-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-10837-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics