Skip to main content

Behavioral Dynamics and Regulation of Transnational Corporations

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Code of Conduct on Transnational Corporations

Part of the book series: CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance ((CSEG))

  • 1119 Accesses

Abstract

Transnational corporations (TNCs) are actively involved in political and economic games in national and international arenas in order to sustain their competitiveness. Powerful States—be they from the western world, Asia or Latin America—participate in these games by supporting their TNCs through economic diplomacy mechanisms. When TNCs operate abroad in weak institutional environments, such as many African countries, there is a strong incentive to use their relatively larger political and economic powers to secure rents. Therefore, they are likely to develop predatory practices such as human rights violations or natural environment damage. Effective regulations against predation depend not only on their intrinsic quality but also on the institutional environment and the behavior of parties involved in their implementation. The development of a global code of conduct requires a sound understanding of TNCs’ behavioral dynamics in relation to their original countries. Drawing on North et al.’s (2009, 2013) taxonomy on social orders, and building on Greif and Tadelis’ (2010) concept of crypto-morality, I build an analytical framework to assess the risk of predation that arises in the interactions between a TNC and a host social order. TNCs adjust their behavior to adapt to their institutional environments, and they make a cost-benefit assessment to arbitrate between a responsible or a predatory behavior. I demonstrate that regulations that force TNCs and States to practice transparency and that impose dissuasive sanctions are most likely to promote ethical and responsible behavior.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    My concept of “predator-prey dynamics” does not refer to the equations of Lotka-Volterra, also called “predator-prey models”, that model the dynamics of interactions between prey and predators’ biological systems.

  2. 2.

    Pigou (1932) introduced the concepts of social costs and private costs. Social costs are all costs borne by society (including private costs) due to the existence of the business, while private costs are all costs incurred or considered by the author of the activity.

  3. 3.

    For example, for various reasons including refusal to sign or ratify the Rome Statute, the United States and the United Kingdom have been able to evade their responsibilities in the war and chaos in Iraq since 2003.

  4. 4.

    The UN Resolution 1973 in 2011 which enabled the international military intervention in Libya was diverted by leading powerful States, including France, and this led to the killing of Muammar Gaddafi and destabilization of the whole Sahel.

  5. 5.

    For example, in Guatemala in 1954 against Jacobo Arbenz (who had openly questioned the land interests of the US TNC United Fruit Company), or in Iran in 1953 against Mohammed Mossadegh (who had decided upon the nationalization of oil, then controlled by the British company Anglo-Iranian Oil Company, when oil was essential to the recovery of England after World War II) (Le Monde 2013; NSA 2013).

  6. 6.

    See L’Humanite.fr (2012) and the outcome with Lang-Roth (2013).

  7. 7.

    The characteristics of the social order will be specified when defining the prey potential (Sect. 3).

  8. 8.

    Governance should not be reduced to the ‘good governance’ doctrine constructed for developing countries in the 1980s by the Bretton Woods institutions and international development finance institutions for structural adjustment plans and democratic reforms. Such an approach of governance is exogenous. In contrast, governance is a mix of endogenous leadership and relevant decisions that are successfully implemented.

  9. 9.

    For more information on this organization and index construction, see http://mo.ibrahim.foundation/fr/iiag/.

  10. 10.

    For more information on this index, see https://www.globalinnovationindex.org/.

  11. 11.

    This adjustment involves a shift (in equal proportion) to the right on the Governance axis and up on the Innovation axis.

  12. 12.

    This cost-benefit analysis has been introduced in Lado (2016).

References

  • Amnesty International. (2014). 30 Après la catastrophe de Bophal, ils continuent à demander justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bisin, A., & Verdier, T. (2001). The economics of cultural transmission and the dynamics of preferences. Journal of Economic Theory, 97, 298–319 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  • David, E., & Lefèvre, G. (2015). Juger les Multinationales. Droits Humains Bafoués, Ressources Naturelles Pillées, Impunité Organisée. Editions Mardaga—GRIP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, J. (1997). Guns, germs, and steel. The fate of human societies. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubresson, A., & Jaglin, S. (2002). La gouvernance urbaine en Afrique subsaharienne: pour une géographie de la régulation. In F. Bart, J. Bonvallot & Pourtier R. (Eds.), Regards sur l’Afrique, Historiens et Géographes (pp. 67–75). IRD. (Online) Available http://www.documentation.ird.fr/hor/fdi:010029294. 04 Jan 2017.

  • Gilpin, R. (1987). The political economy of international relations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greif, A., & Tadelis, S. (2010). A theory of moral persistence: Crypto-morality and political legitimacy. Journal of Comparative Economics, 38(3), 229–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keohane, R. (1984). After hegemony: Cooperation and discord in the world political economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keohane, R., & Nye, J. (2012). Power and interdependence, 4th Ed. Logman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knorr, K. (1975). The power of nations. The political economy of international relations. New York: Basic Books Inc. Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lado, H. (2016). Les responsabilités sociétales obligatoires et volontaires des entreprises. Revue Française de Gestion, 42(260), 143–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lang-Roth, C. (2013). ArcelorMittal: un accord social trouvé à Florange. France Bleu (30 May 2013). (Online) Available https://www.francebleu.fr/arcelormittal-un-accord-social-trouve-florange-1369886400. 04 January 2017.

  • Le Floch-Prigent, L., & Decouty, E. (2001). L’affaire Elf, affaire d’Etat. Entretiens avec Eric Decouty. Paris: Ed. Le Cherche Midi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Monde. (2013). La CIA reconnaît son rôle dans le coup d’Etat en Iran en 1953. (Online) Available http://www.lemonde.fr/ameriques/article/2013/08/19/la-cia-reconnait-avoir-renverse-le-premier-ministre-iranien-en-1953_3463576_3222.html. 04 January 2017.

  • L’Humanité. (2012). Florange sera “le cauchemar du gouvernement”. (Online) Available http://www.humanite.fr/social-eco/florange-sera-le-cauchemar-du-gouvernement-491101. 04 January 2017.

  • Mitchell, T. (2013). Carbon democracy. Le pouvoir politique à l’ère du pétrole. Ed. La Découverte.

    Google Scholar 

  • North, D., Wallis, J., & Weingast, B. (2009). Violence and social orders. A conceptual framework for interpreting recorded human history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • North, D., Wallis, J., Webb, S., & Weingast, B. (2013). In the shadow of violence: Politics, economics and the problem of violence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • NSA. (2013). CIA confirms role in 1953 Iran Coup. (Online) Available http://nsarchive.gwu.edu/NSAEBB/NSAEBB435/. 04 January 2017.

  • Nurdin, G., & Djermoun, S. (2015). Les multinationales émergentes. Comment elles changent la donne mondiale. L’Harmattan.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2013). Addressing base erosion and profit shifting. Paris: OECD Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ozawa, T. (2016). The evolution of the world economy. The ‘Flying-Geese’ theory of multinational corporations and structural transformation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgard Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pigou, A. C. (1932). The economics of welfare. London: Macmillan and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reich, R. (2011). Le Jour d’Après, Sans réduction des inégalités, Pas de sortie de crise. Vuibert.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stopford, J. M., & Strange, S. (1991). Rival states, rival firms. Competition for world market shares. Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Strange, S. (1988). States and markets. Pinter Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strange, S. (1996). The retreat of the state. The diffusion of power in the world economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veblen, T. (1970). Théorie de la classe de loisir. Trad. de Louis Evrard (édition originale en 1890). Gallimard.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hervé Lado .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Lado, H. (2019). Behavioral Dynamics and Regulation of Transnational Corporations. In: Rahim, M. (eds) Code of Conduct on Transnational Corporations. CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10816-8_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics