Skip to main content

Latin America Since the 1990s: Deindustrialization, Reprimarization and Policy Space Restrictions

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Political Economy of Peripheral Growth

Abstract

This chapter summarizes the evolution of Latin America’s integration into the world economy since the 1980s from a structuralist perspective. It describes the different moments of the region’s insertion: the lost decade and the implementation of the liberalization agenda during the eighties, the nineties and the export turn of the region together with the wave of trade agreements with core countries and the impact of the commodity boom on the region’s productive structure. It concludes that the region is facing a growth regime that is based on an extractive and a low-value added export basket, a deep deindustrialization and restricted policy space for the states to implement pro-developmental policies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Data from Bértola and Ocampo (2012: 207, 224).

  2. 2.

    North American Free Trade Agreement.

  3. 3.

    Dominican Republic-Central America Free Trade Agreement . It includes the US, Costa Rica, El Salvador, Dominican Republic, Guatemala, Honduras and Nicaragua.

  4. 4.

    The General System of Preferences (GSP ) is a unilateral mechanism of tariff preferences established in 1968 under GATT . It is a tariff regime below the MFN offered by developed countries to imports of goods coming from developing regions, in order to promote the latter’s exports. As it is a unilateral mechanism, it is subject to arbitrary changes by the developed countries. They can exclude a given country’s exports on political and/or economic grounds, as well as specific products, on the grounds these have a negative impact on internal competitiveness.

References

  • Abugattas, L., & Paus, E. (2008). Policy space for a capability-centered development strategy for Latin America. In K. Shadlen & D. Sánchez-Ancochea (Eds.), The political economy of hemispheric integration. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amsden, A. (2007). Escape from empire: The developing world’s journey through heaven to hell. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bértola, L., & Ocampo, J. A. (2012). The economic development of Latin America since the independence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, H.-J. (2002). Kicking away the ladder: Development strategy in historical perspective. London, UK: Anthem Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, H.-J. (2008). Bad samaritans: The guilty secrets of rich nations and the threat to global prosperity. London, UK: Random House Business.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cypher, J., & Delgado, R. (2010). Mexico’s economic dilemma. Plymouth, UK: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deere, C. (2008). The implementation game: The TRIPS agreements and the politics of intellectual property reforms in developing countries. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Devlin, R., & Estevadeordal, A. (2001). ¿Qué hay de nuevo en el nuevo regionalismo de las Américas? (Working Paper No.7). IDB-INTAL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Díaz-Alejandro, C. (1985). Goodbye financial repression, hello financial crash. Journal of Development Economics, 19(1–2), 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dussel, E. (2008). What does China’s integration to the global economy mean for Latin America? The Mexican experience. In K. Shadlen & D. Sánchez-Ancochea (Eds.), The political economy of hemispheric integration. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC). (1997). La inversión extranjera en América Latina y el Caribe. Santiago, Chile: UN-ECLAC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC). (2000). La inversión extranjera en América Latina y el Caribe. Santiago, Chile: UN-ECLAC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ffrench-Davis, R. (2005). Reforming Latin America’s economies. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frieden, J. (1991). Debt, development and democracy: Modern political economy and Latin America, 1965–1985. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, K. (2008). Trading away the ladder? Trade politics and economic development in the Americas. New Political Economy, 15(1), 37–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, K. (2016). The China triangle: Latin America’s China boom and the fate of the Washington Consensus. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, K., & Zarsky, L. (2007). The enclave economy: Foreign investment and sustainable development in Mexico’s Silicon Valley. United States: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, K., & Porzencanski, R. (2010). The dragon in the Room: China and the future of Latin American industrialization. United States: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, K., & Thrascher, R. (2008). 21st century trade agreements: Implications for long-run development policy (Trade Papers No. 2). Boston, MA: Boston University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gasparini, L., & Luistig, N. (2011). The rise and fall of income inequality in Latin America. In J. A. Ocampo & J. Ross (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Latin American economics. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, D. (2003). Silent revolution: The rise and crisis of market economics in Latin America. New York: Monthly Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffith-Jones, S. (2000). International capital flows to Latin America. Serie Reformas Económicas, LC/L. 351, ECLAC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffith-Jones, S., & Sunkel, O. (1986). Debt and development crises in Latin America. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, K. (1995). Intellectual property under NAFTA: Is Chile up to the challenge. Tulsa Journal of Comparative and International Law, 2(2), 367–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingstone, P. (2011). The political economy of Latin America: Some reflections on neoliberalism and development. London, UK: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lengyel, M., & Ventura-Dias, V. (Eds.). (2004). Trade policy reforms in Latin America. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mavroeidi, V., & Ahumada, J. M. (2017). An Asian century: Latin America vis-à-vis the rise of China and India. Integration and Trade Journal, 21(43), 148–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreno-Brid, J., & Garry, S. (2017). Economic performance in Latin America in the 2000s: Recession, recovery and resilience? In E. Pérez Caldentey & M. Vernengo (Eds.), Why Latin American nations fail. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ocampo, J. A. (2014). The Latin American debt crisis in historical perspective. In J. Stiglitz & D. Heymann (Eds.), Life after debt. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ocampo, J. A. (2017). Latin America’s mounting development challenges. In E. Pérez Caldentey & M. Vernengo (Eds.), Why Latin American nations fail. Oakland, CA: University of California.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Keefe, T. A. (2009). Latin American trade agreements: Keys to a prosperous community of the Americas. Leiden, The Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Palma, J. G. (2008). De-industrialization, ‘premature’ de-industrialization and the Dutch disease. In S. Durlauf & L. Blume (Eds.), The new Palgrave dictionary of economics. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palma, J. G. (2012). How the full opening of the capital account to highly liquid financial markets led Latin America to two and a half cycles of ‘mania, panic and crash (Cambridge Working Papers in Economics [CWPE] 1201). University of Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, N. (2004). The Southern Cone model: The political economy of regional capitalist development in Latin America. London, UK: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, N. (2007). Consequences of an emerging China: Is development space disappearing for Latin America and the Caribbean? (CIGI Working Paper No. 14).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodrik, D. (1999). Why is there so much economic insecurity in Latin America? CEPAL Review, 73, 7–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sánchez-Ancochea, D. (2008). State and society: The political economy of DR-CAFTA in Costa Rica, the Dominican Republic and El Salvador. In K. Shadlen & D. Sánchez-Ancochea (Eds.), The political economy of hemispheric integration. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Shadlen, K. (2005). Exchanging development for market access?: Deep integration and industrial policy under multilateral and regional-bilateral trade agreements. Review of International Political Economy, 12(5), 750–775.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shadlen, K. (2009). Resources, rules and international political economy: The politics of development in the WTO. In S. Joseph, D. Kinley, & J. Waincymer (Eds.), World Trade Organization and human rights: Interdisciplinary perspectives. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stallings, B. (1987). Banker to the third world. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stallings, B. (1992). International influence on economic policy: Debt, stabilization and structural reform. In S. Haggard & R. Kaufman (Eds.), The politics of economic adjustment. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stallings, B., & Peres, W. (2000). Crecimiento, empleo y equidad. Santiago: Fondo de Cultura Económica-ECLAC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J. (2003). Globalization and its discontents. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wade, R. (2003). What strategies are viable for developing countries today? The World Trade Organization and the shrinking of “development space”. Review of International Political Economy, 10(4), 621–644.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ahumada, J.M. (2019). Latin America Since the 1990s: Deindustrialization, Reprimarization and Policy Space Restrictions. In: The Political Economy of Peripheral Growth. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10743-7_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10743-7_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-10742-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-10743-7

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics