Abstract
The roots of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) lie in the sensitivity to environmental and social sustainability. This sensitivity obviously includes corporate managers and must be developed throughout their education. This paper focuses on how to develop the sensitivity of business students to sustainability through an analysis of literary fiction. Literature is an excellent source for being confronted with human feelings and attitudes. The central goal is to associate human situations with the outcomes of cool calculations, and, furthermore, to relate them to behavioral finance. With this aim, this paper analyses two plays: Shakespeare’s The Merchant of Venice and Ibsen’s The Wild Duck. The Merchant of Venice presents an interesting interweaving of financial and social sustainability. We find in it an unregulated financial system in which lenders can freely decide the clauses of the contracts. Turning to the social side, the play shows a society dominated by the male of a dominant social class, against whom the racial and religious outcast Shylock, a Jew, plans revenge; while, in different ways, women try to overcome their secondary social role. After class discussions, students should be able to answer questions like: which social consequences do the lack of a fair financial regulation foster? How do pride, hate, and revenge create a barrier to social progress? The Wild Duck, in turn, can be taken as a metaphor of how humans cannot live confronted with nature. The environmental outrage (in reaction to the cutting down of the forest) that pervades the play and the tragedy that it creates are analyzed as the result of egotist management that puts aside environment and society. The Old Ekland’s last sentence, the forest has taken its revenge, summarizes the failure of men going against nature.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
All the quotations from The Merchant of Venice have been taken from the Arden Edition (Shakespeare 1955).
- 2.
All the quotations from The Wild Duck have been taken from the Methuen World Classics Editon (Ibsen 1980).
- 3.
Interpreted in the Arden Edition as “yours de jure, not de facto” (p. 77, footnote 20).
References
Akerlof, G., and R.J. Shiller. 2009. Animal Spirits: How Human Psychology Drives the Economy, and Why It Matters for Global Capitalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Badaracco, J.L. 2006a. Leadership in Literature: A Conversation with Business Ethicist Joseph L. Badaracco, Jr. Interview by Diane L. Coutu. Harvard Business Review 84 (3): 47–55.
Badaracco, J.L. 2006b. Questions of Character: Illuminating the Heart of Leadership Through Literature. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Bagozzi, R.P., M. Gopinath, and P.U. Nyer. 1999. The Role of Emotions in Marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 27 (2): 184–206. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070399272005.
Bal, P.M., and M. Veltkamp. 2013. How Does Fiction Reading Influence Empathy? An Experimental Investigation on the Role of Emotional Transportation. PLoS One 8 (1): e55341. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0055341.
Barter, N., and H. Tregidga. 2014. Guest Editorial Storytelling: Beyond the Academic Article: Using Fiction, Art and Literary Techniques to Communicate. Journal of Corporate Citizenship 54 (June): 5–10. https://doi.org/10.9774/gleaf.4700.2014.ju.00003.
Beckert, J. 2013. Imagined Futures: Fictional Expectations in the Economy. Theory and Society 42 (3): 219–240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-013-9191-2.
Benston, A.N. 1979. Portia, the Law, and the Tripartite Structure of the Merchant of Venice. Shakespeare Quarterly 30 (3): 367–385. https://doi.org/10.2307/2869472.
Bloom, H. 1999. Shakespeare: The Invention of the Human. London: Fourth Estate.
Bloom, H. 2001. A Reading List for Bill Gates—and You. A Conversation with Literary Critic Harold Bloom. Interview by Diane L. Coutu. Harvard Business Review 79 (5): 63–68.
Desai, M. 2017. The Wisdom of Finance. London: Profile Books.
Dickens, Charles. 1995. Hard Times. London: Penguin Classics.
Dunne, D. 2014. ‘O, My Ducats! O, My Daughter!’ The Economics of Love in The Merchant of Venice. Accessed at 23 May 2018. http://2014.playingshakespeare.org/o-my-ducatso-my-daughter-the-economics-of-love-in-the-merchant-of-venice.
Egan, M. 2000. Managers as Kings: Shakespeare on Modern Leadership. Management Decision 38 (5): 315–327. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251740010340490.
Elkington, J. 1994. Towards the Sustainable Corporation: Win-Win-Win Business Strategies for Sustainable Development. California Management Review 36 (2): 90–100. https://doi.org/10.2307/41165746.
Goldman, M. 1994. Eyolf’s Eyes: Ibsen and the Cultural Meanings of Child Abuse. American Imago 51 (3): 279–305.
Guber, P. 2007. The Four Truths of the Storyteller. Harvard Business Review 85 (12): 52–59.
Harp, R. 2010. Love and Money in The Merchant of Venice. Modern Age 52 (1): 37–44.
Heinrichs, J. 2017. Thank You for Arguing. London: Penguin Books.
Ibsen, H. 1980. The Wild Duck. English translation by Michael Meyer. London: Methuen Drama.
Ioannidou, F., and V. Konstantikaki. 2008. Empathy and Emotional Intelligence. International Journal of Caring Sciences 1 (3): 118–123.
Jennings, M. 2013. Literature and Ethics in Finance. Corporate Finance Review 18 (3): 29–33.
Kahneman, D. 2011. Thinking Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Girou.
Kidd, D.C., and E. Castano. 2013. Reading Literary Fiction Improves Theory of Mind. Science 342 (18): 377–380. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1239918.
Korda, N. 2009. Dame Usury: Gender, Credit, and (Ac)counting in the Sonnets and The Merchant of Venice. Shakespeare Quarterly 60 (2): 129–153. https://doi.org/10.1353/shq.0.0072.
Ludwig, D.C., and C.O. Longenecker. 1993. The Bathsheba Syndrome: The Ethical Failure of Successful Leaders. Journal of Business Ethics 12 (4): 265–273. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01666530.
Malkiel, M. 2015. A Random Walk Down Wall Street. New York: Norton.
Mar, R.A., and K. Oatley. 2008. The Function of Fiction Is the Abstraction and Simulation of Social Experience. Perspectives on Psychological Science 3 (3): 173–192. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6924.2008.00073.x.
Morson, G.S., and M. Schapiro. 2017. Cents and Sensibility: What Economics Can Learn from Humanities. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Murphy, P.E. 1999. Character and Virtue Ethics in International Marketing. Journal of Business Ethics 18 (1): 107–124. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1006072413165.
Nofsinger, J.R. 2016. The Psychology of Investing. London: Routledge.
Nünning, V. 2017. The Affective Value of Fiction. Writing Emotions, 29–54. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1wxt3t.5.
Nussbaum, M. 1986. The Fragility of Goodness: Luck and Ethics in Greek Tragedy and Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Oatley, K. 1999. Why Fiction May Be Twice as True as Fact: Fiction as Cognitive and Emotional Simulation. Review of General Psychology 3 (2): 101–117. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.3.2.101.
Porter, M.E., and M.R. Kramer. 2006. Strategy and Society. Harvard Business Review 84 (12): 78.
Rappaport, A. 2012. Saving Capitalism from Short-Termism. New York: McGrawHill.
Roy, D., and R. Zeckhauser. 2017. Ignorance: Literary Light on Decision’s Dark Corner. In Routledge Handbook of Behavioral Economics, ed. R. Frantz, S.H. Chen, K. Dopfer, F. Heulekom, and S. Mousavi, 230–249. London: Routledge.
Shakespeare, W. 1955. The Merchant of Venice, ed. John Russell Brown. Arden Edition. London: Methuen.
Shiller, R. 2012. Finance and the Good Society. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Shiller, R. 2017. Narrative Economics. American Economic Review 107 (4): 967–1004. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.107.4.967.
Stafford, T.F. 1999. Persuasion and Marketing. Psychology & Marketing 16 (2): 87–90.
Trepanier, L. 2014. Contract, Friendship, and Love in The Merchant of Venice. Perspectives on Political Science 43 (4): 204–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/10457097.2014.948735.
Wagner, T., R.J. Lutz, and B.A. Weitz. 2009. Corporate Hypocrisy: Overcoming the Threat of Inconsistent Corporate Social Responsibility Perceptions. Journal of Marketing 73 (6): 77–91. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.73.6.77.
Woolf, V. 1922. On Re-reading Novels. In Collected Essays (1967), vol. 2, 122–130. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.
Younkins, E.W. 2014. Exploring Capitalist Fiction. Lanham: Lexington Books.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank three anonymous referees and the editors for their valuable comments. The usual disclaimer applies.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bosch Badia, M.T., Montllor-Serrats, J., Tarrazon-Rodon, MA. (2019). Financial Education, Literary Fiction, and Corporate Social Responsibility. In: Farache, F., Grigore, G., Stancu, A., McQueen, D. (eds) Responsible People. Palgrave Studies in Governance, Leadership and Responsibility. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10740-6_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10740-6_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-10739-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-10740-6
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)