Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Treatment Alternatives Following Extraction of Teeth with Periodontal-Endodontic Lesions

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Endodontic-Periodontal Lesions

Abstract

Following extraction of tooth/teeth with advanced loss of periodontal support, as those with periodontal-endodontic lesions, the remaining bone architecture should be carefully evaluated, especially where implant-supported restoration is planned. Marked resorption of the residual alveolar bone is usually appreciated 3 months after tooth extraction. This process may impair implant-supported restoration outcome, especially in the upper jaw, where esthetics is a key factor. Different treatment alternatives are available at the time of tooth extraction, namely immediate implant placement, primary soft tissue closure of the extraction site that may be followed by early implant placement, ridge preservation, and ridge augmentation. For each clinical case, treatment possibilities should be considered and evaluated according to tooth location, esthetics, soft tissue characteristics, infection, number of implants simultaneously placed, available bone volume, bony defects, and treatment convenience.

The immediate post-extraction implant may present certain advantages compared to implant placement in healed sites, mainly concerning the possibility for immediate restoration and reduction of overall treatment time and surgical sessions. Advantages and risks related to implant placement in infected sockets following the extraction of teeth with advanced loss of supporting bone should be carefully evaluated.

Surgical procedures based on rotated full and/or split palatal flaps that allow for primary soft tissue closure over the extraction sites may be a useful treatment approach for improved results in the maxilla. Although, the benefit of immediate implant placement and socket preservation procedures is not evident. Treatment rationales that allow preservation and/or augmentation of soft and hard tissues at the time of maxillary tooth extraction could offer benefits for the overall long-term functional and esthetic success of the future implant-supported rehabilitation.

Defect morphologies that allow improved bone regeneration are present shortly after extraction; however, primary soft tissue closure and maintenance over the barrier membrane and bone graft seems to be one of the most important factors for success of GBR procedures, disregarding the timing of implant placement related to tooth extraction.

The different treatment alternatives will be discussed and evaluated based on literature review and clinical studies. The objective is to provide the scientific evidence for the different approaches to facilitate the election of the most appropriate treatment alternative for each clinical situation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Esposito M, Grusovin MG, Polyzos IP, Felice P, Worthington HV. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: dental implants in fresh extraction sockets (immediate, immediate-delayed and delayed implants). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;8:CD005968. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005968.pub3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Deng F, Zhang H, Zhang H, Shao H, He Q, Zhang P. A Comparison of clinical outcomes for implants placed in fresh extraction sockets versus healed sites in periodontally compromised patients: a 1-year follow-up report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2010;25(5):1036–40.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Buser D, Chappuis V, Belser UC, Chen S. Implant placement post extraction in esthetic single tooth sites: when immediate, when early, when late? Periodontology 2000. 2017;73:84–102.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Araújo MG, Lindhe J. Dimensional ridge alterations following tooth extraction. An experimental study in the dog. J Clin Periodontol. 2005;32:212–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Buchwald S, Kocher T, Biffar R, Harb A, Holtfreter B, Meisel P. Tooth loss and periodontitis by socio-economic status and inflammation in a longitudinal population-based study. J Clin Periodontol. 2013;40:203–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Pietrokovski J, Massler M. Alveolar ridge resorption following tooth extraction. J Prosthet Dent. 1967;17:21–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ten Heggeler JM, Slot DE, Van der Weijden GA. Effect of socket preservation therapies following tooth extraction in non-molar regions in humans: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011;22:779–88.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cardaropoli G, Araujo M, Lindhe J. Dynamics of bone tissue formation in tooth extraction sites. An experimental study in dogs. J Clin Periodontol. 2003;30:809–18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ahn JJ, Shin HI. Bone tissue formation in extraction sockets from sites with advanced periodontal disease: a histomorphometric study in humans. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008;23:1133–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Johnson K. A study of the dimensional changes occurring in the maxilla following tooth extraction. Aust Dent J. 1969;14:241–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Schropp L, Wenzel A, Kostopoulos L, Karring T. Bone healing and soft tissue contour changes following single-tooth extraction: a clinical and radiographic 12-month prospective study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2003;23:313–23.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Araújo M, Linder E, Wennstrom J, Lindhe J. The influence of Bio-Oss Collagen on healing of an extraction socket: an experimental study in the dog. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2008;28:123–35.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Tan WL, Wong TL, Wong MC, Lang NP. A systematic review of post-extractional alveolar hard and soft tissue dimensional changes in humans. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012;23(Suppl 5):1–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Barone A, Ricci M, Calvo-Guirado JL, Covani U. Bone remodelling after regenerative procedures around implants placed in fresh extraction sockets: an experimental study in the Beagle dogs. Clin Oral Impl Res. 2011;22:1131–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Covani U, Bortolaia C, Barone A, Sbordone L. Bucco-lingual crestal bone changes after immediate and delayed implant placement. J Periodontol. 2004;75(12):1605–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Araújo MG, Sukekava F, Wennstr€om JL, Lindhe J. Ridge alterations following implant placement in fresh extraction sockets: an experimental study in the dog. J Clin Periodontol. 2005;32:645–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Botticelli D, Berglundh T, Lindhe J. Resolution of bone defects of varying dimension and configuration in the marginal portion of the peri-implant bone. An experimental study in the dog. J Clin Periodontol. 2004;31:309–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sicilia A, Botticelli D, Working Group 3. Computer-guided implant therapy and soft- and hard-tissue aspects. The Third EAO Consensus Conference 2012. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012;23(Suppl 6):157–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Wang R, Lang NP. Ridge preservation after tooth extraction. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012;23(Suppl 6):147–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Botticelli D, Berglundh T, Lindhe J. Hard-tissue alterations following immediate implant placement in extraction sites. J Clin Periodontol. 2004;31:820–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Botticelli D, Renzi A, Lindhe J, Berglundh T. Implants in fresh extraction sockets: a prospective 5-year follow-up clinical study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008;19:1226–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Botticelli D, Persson LG, Lindhe J, Berglundh T. Bone tissue formation adjacent to implants placed in fresh extraction sockets: an experimental study in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006;17:351–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Corbella S, Taschieri S, Samaranayake L, Tsesis I, Nemcovsky C, Del Fabbro M. Implant treatment choice after extraction of a vertically fractured tooth. A proposal for a clinical classification of bony defects based on a systematic review of literature. Clin Oral Impl Res. 2014;25:946–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Braut V, Bornstein MM, Belser U, Buser D. Thickness of the anterior maxillary facial bone wall – a retrospective radiographic study using cone beam computed tomography. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2011;31:125–31.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Januario AL, Duarte WR, Barriviera M, Mesti JC, Araujo MG, Lindhe J. Dimension of the facial bone wall in the anterior maxilla: a cone-beam computed tomography study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011;22:1168–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Vera C, De Kok IJ, Reinhold D, Limpiphipatanakorn P, Yap AK, Tyndall D, Cooper LF. Evaluation of buccal alveolar bone dimension of maxillary anterior and premolar teeth: a cone beam computed tomography investigation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012;27:1514–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Chen ST, Darby I. The relationship between buccal bone wall defects and dimensional alterations of the ridge following flapless tooth extraction in the anterior maxilla. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017;28(8):931–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12899.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Siegenthaler DW, Jung RE, Holderegger C, Roos M, Hammerle CH. Replacement of teeth exhibiting periapical pathology by immediate implants: a prospective, controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007;18:727–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Taschieri S, Rosano G, Weinstein T, Del Fabbro M. Replacement of vertically root-fractured endodontically treated teeth with immediate implants in conjunction with a synthetic bone cement. Implant Dent. 2010;19:477–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Truninger TC, Philipp AO, Siegenthaler DW, Roos M, Hammerle CH, Jung RE. A prospective, controlled clinical trial evaluating the clinical and radiological outcome after 3 years of immediately placed implants in sockets exhibiting periapical pathology. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011;22:20–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Villa R, Rangert B. Immediate and early function of implants placed in extraction sockets of maxillary infected teeth: a pilot study. J Prosthet Dent. 2007;97:S96–S108.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Chrcanovic BR, Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A. Dental implants inserted in fresh extraction sockets versus healed sites: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent. 2015;43(1):16–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2014.11.007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Chen ST, Darby IB, Reynolds EC. A prospective clinical study of non-submerged immediate implants: clinical outcomes and esthetic results. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007;18:552–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Cordaro L, Torsello F, Roccuzzo M. Clinical outcome of submerged vs. non-submerged implants placed in fresh extraction sockets. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009;20:1307–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. De Rouck T, Collys K, Cosyn J. Immediate single-tooth implants in the anterior maxilla: a 1-year case cohort study on hard and soft tissue response. J Clin Periodontol. 2008;35:649–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Evans CD, Chen ST. Esthetic outcomes of immediate implant placements. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008;19:73–80.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Kan JY, Rungcharassaeng K, Lozada J. Immediate placement and provisionalization of maxillary anterior single implants: 1-year prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2003;18:31–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Kan JY, Rungcharassaeng K, Sclar A, Lozada JL. Effects of the facial osseous defect morphology on gingival dynamics after immediate tooth replacement and guided bone regeneration: 1-year results. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007;65:13–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Lindeboom JA, Tjiook Y, Kroon FH. Immediate placement of implants in periapical infected sites: a prospective randomized study in 50 patients. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2006;101:705–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Lee CT, Chiu TS, Chuang SK, Tarnow D, Stoupel J. Alterations of the bone dimension following immediate implant placement into extraction socket: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Periodontol. 2014;41(9):914–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12276.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Benic GI, Mokti M, Chen CJ, Weber HP, Hammerle CH, Gallucci GO. Dimensions of buccal bone and mucosa at immediately placed implants after 7 years: a clinical and cone beam computed tomography study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012;23:560–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Buser D, Bornstein MM, Weber HP, Grutter L, Schmid B, Belser UC. Early implant placement with simultaneous guided bone regeneration following single-tooth extraction in the esthetic zone: a cross-sectional, retrospective study in 45 subjects with a 2- to 4-year follow-up. J Periodontol. 2008;79:1773–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Buser D, Hart C, Bornstein M, Grutter L, Chappuis V, Belser UC. Early implant placement with simultaneous GBR following single-tooth extraction in the esthetic zone: 12-month results of a prospective study with 20 consecutive patients. J Periodontol. 2009;80:152–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Chen ST, Buser D. Esthetic outcomes following immediate and early implant placement in the anterior maxilla – a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014;29(Suppl):186–215.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Cosyn J, De Rouck T. Aesthetic outcome of single-tooth implant restorations following early implant placement and guided bone regeneration: crown and soft tissue dimensions compared with contralateral teeth. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009;20:1063–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Kuchler U, Chappuis V, Gruber R, Lang NP, Salvi GE. Immediate implant placement with simultaneous guided bone regeneration in the esthetic zone: 10-year clinical and radiographic outcomes. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016;27:253–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Morton D, Chen ST, Martin WC, Levine RA, Buser D. Consensus statements and recommended clinical procedures regarding optimizing esthetic outcomes in implant dentistry. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014;29. (Suppl:216–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Chappuis V, Engel O, Reyes M, Shahim K, Nolte LP, Buser D. Ridge alterations post-extraction in the esthetic zone: a 3D analysis with CBCT. J Dent Res. 2013;92:195S–201S.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Tonetti MS, Cortellini P, Graziani F, Cairo F, Lang NP, Abundo R, Conforti GP, Marquardt S, Rasperini G, Silvestri M, Wallkamm B, Wetzel A. Immediate versus delayed implant placement after anterior single tooth extraction: the timing randomized controlled clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2017;44(2):215–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Brugger OE, Bornstein MM, Kuchler U, Janner SF, Chappuis V, Buser D. Implant therapy in a surgical specialty clinic: an analysis of patients, indications, surgical procedures, risk factors, and early failures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2015;30:151–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Chu SJ, Salama MA, Garber DA, Salama H, Sarnachiaro GO, Sarnachiaro E, Gotta SL, Reynolds MA, Saito H, Tarnow DP. Flapless postextraction socket implant placement, part 2: the effects of bone grafting and provisional restoration on peri-implant soft tissue height and thickness – a retrospective study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2015;35:803–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Kan JY, Rungcharassaeng K, Morimoto T, Lozada J. Facial gingival tissue stability after connective tissue graft with single immediate tooth replacement in the esthetic zone: consecutive case report. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009;67:40–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Tsuda H, Rungcharassaeng K, Kan JY, Roe P, Lozada JL, Zimmerman G. Peri-implant tissue response following connective tissue and bone grafting in conjunction with immediate single-tooth replacement in the esthetic zone: a case series. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2011;26:427–36.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Raes F, Cosyn J, Crommelinck E, Coessens P, De Bruyn H. Immediate and conventional single implant treatment in the anterior maxilla: 1-year results of a case series on hard and soft tissue response and aesthetics. J Clin Periodontol. 2011;38:385–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Cosyn J, Eghbali A, Hermans A, Vervaeke S, De Bruyn H, Cleymaet R. A 5-year prospective study on single immediate implants in the aesthetic zone. J Clin Periodontol. 2016;43:702–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Kan JY, Rungcharassaeng K, Lozada JL, Zimmerman G. Facial gingival tissue stability following immediate placement and provisionalization of maxillary anterior single implants: a 2- to 8-year follow up. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2011;26:179–87.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Caneva M, Salata LA, de Souza SS, Baffone G, Lang NP, Botticelli D. Influence of implant positioning in extraction sockets on osseointegration: histomorphometric analyses in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010;21:43–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Tomasi C, Sanz M, Cecchinato D, Pjetursson B, Ferrus J, Lang NP, Lindhe J. Bone dimensional variations at implants placed in fresh extraction sockets: a multilevel multivariate analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010;21:30–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Calvo-Guirado JL, Gomez Moreno G, Aguilar-Salvatierra A, Mate Sanchez de Val JE, Abboud M, Nemcovsky CE. Bone remodeling at implants with different configurations and placed immediately at differentdepth into extraction sockets. Experimental study in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015;26(5):507–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12433.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Araújo MG, Linder E, Lindhe J. Bio- Oss_ Collagen in the buccal gap at immediate implants: a 6-months study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011;22:1–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Caneva M, Botticelli D, Morelli F, Cesaretti G, Beolchini M, Lang NP. Alveolar process preservation at implants installed immediately into extraction sockets using deproteinized bovine bone mineral – an experimental study in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012;23:789–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Caneva M, Botticelli D, Pantani F, Baffone GM, Rangel IG Jr, Lang NP. Deproteinized bovine bone mineral in marginal defects at implants installed immediately into extraction sockets. An experimental study in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011;23:106–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Caneva M, Botticelli D, Stellini E, Salata LA, Souza SLS, Lang NP. Magnesium-enriched hydroxyapatite at immediate implants. A histomorphometric study in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011;22:512–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Lindhe J, Araujo MG, Bufler M, Liljenberg B. Biphasic alloplastic graft used to preserve the dimension of the edentulous ridge: an experimental study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013;24:1158–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Favero G, Lang NP, Romanelli P, Pantani F, Caneva M, Botticelli D. A digital evaluation of alveolar ridge preservation at implants placed immediately into extraction sockets: an experimental study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015;26(1):102–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12307.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Zitzmann NU, Schärer P, Marinello CP. Long-term results of implants treated with guided bone regeneration: a 5-year prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2001;16:355–66.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Iorio Siciliano V, Salvi GE, Matarasso S, Cafiero C, Blasi A, Lang NP. Soft tissues healing at immediate transmucosal implants placed into molar extraction sites with buccal self-contained dehiscences. A 12-month controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009;20:482–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Matarasso S, Salvi GE, Iorio Siciliano V, Cafiero C, Blasi A, Lang NP. Dimensional ridge alterations following immediate implant placement in molar extraction sites: a six-month prospective cohort study with surgical re-entry. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009;20(10):1092–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01803.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Clementini M, Tiravia L, De Risi V, Vittorini Orgeas G, Mannocci A, de Sanctis M. Dimensional changes after immediate implant placement with or without simultaneous regenerative procedures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Periodontol. 2015;42(7):666–77. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12423.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Nemcovsky CE. Interproximal papilla augmentation procedure: a novel surgical approach and clinical evaluation of 10 consecutive procedures. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2001;21(6):553–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Kourkouta S, Dedi KD, Paquette DW, Mol A. Interproximal tissue dimensions in relation to adjacent implants in the anterior maxilla: clinical observations and patient aesthetic evaluation. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009;20(12):1375–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01761.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Nemcovsky CE, Artzi Z. Split palatal flap. I. A surgical approach for primary soft tissue healing in ridge augmentation procedures: technique and clinical results. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1999;19(2):175–81.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Nemcovsky CE, Artzi Z. Split palatal flap. II. A surgical approach for maxillary implant uncovering in cases with reduced keratinized tissue: technique and clinical results. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1999;19(4):385–93.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Nemcovsky CE, Moses O. Rotated palatal flap. A surgical approach to increase keratinized tissue width in maxillary implant uncovering: technique and clinical evaluation. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2002;22(6):607–12.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Nemcovsky CE, Moses O, Artzi Z, Gelernter I. Clinical coverage of dehiscence defects in immediate implant procedures: three surgical modalities to achieve primary soft tissue closure. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2000;15(6):843–52.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Tal H. Autogenous masticatory mucosal grafts in extraction socket seal procedures: a comparison between sockets grafted with demineralized freeze-dried bone and deproteinized bovine bone mineral. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1999;10(4):289–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Nemcovsky CE, Artzi Z, Moses O, Gelernter I. Healing of dehiscence defects at delayed-immediate implant sites primarily closed by a rotated palatal flap following extraction. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2000;15(4):550–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Nemcovsky CE, Artzi Z, Moses O, Gelernter I. Healing of marginal defects at implants placed in fresh extraction sockets or after 4-6 weeks of healing. A comparative study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2002;13(4):410–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Nemcovsky CE, Artzi Z, Moses O. Rotated split palatal flap for soft tissue primary coverage over extraction sites with immediate implant placement. Description of the surgical procedure and clinical results. J Periodontol. 1999;70(8):926–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Nemcovsky CE, Artzi Z, Moses O. Rotated palatal flap in immediate implant procedures. Clinical evaluation of 26 consecutive cases. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2000;11(1):83–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Nemcovsky CE, Artzi Z. Comparative study of buccal dehiscence defects in immediate, delayed, and late maxillary implant placement with collagen membranes: clinical healing between placement and second-stage surgery. J Periodontol. 2002;73(7):754–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Nemcovsky CE, Moses O, Artzi Z. Interproximal papillae reconstruction in maxillary implants. J Periodontol. 2000;71(2):308–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Nemcovsky CE, Serfaty V. Alveolar ridge preservation following extraction of maxillary anterior teeth. Report on 23 consecutive cases. J Periodontol. 1996;67(4):390–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Chappuis V, Engel O, Shahim K, Reyes M, Katsaros C, Buser D. Soft tissue alterations in esthetic postextraction sites: a 3-dimensional analysis. J Dent Res. 2015;94:187S–93S.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Chen ST, Wilson TG Jr, Hämmerle CH. Immediate or early placement of implants following tooth extraction: review of biologic basis, clinical procedures, and outcomes. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004;19(Suppl):12–25.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Huynh-Ba G, Pjetursson BE, Sanz M, Cecchinato D, Ferrus J, Lindhe J, Lang NP. Analysis of the socket bone wall dimensions in the upper maxilla in relation to immediate implant placement. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010;21(1):37–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01870.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Beitlitum I, Artzi Z, Nemcovsky CE. Clinical evaluation of particulate allogeneic with and without autogenous bone grafts and resorbable collagen membranes for bone augmentation of atrophic alveolar ridges. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010;21(11):1242–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01936.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Moses O, Pitaru S, Artzi Z, Nemcovsky CE. Healing of dehiscence-type defects in implants placed together with different barrier membranes: a comparative clinical study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2005;16(2):210–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Garcia J, Dodge A, Luepke P, Wang HL, Kapila Y, Lin GH. Effect of membrane exposure on guided bone regeneration: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018;29(3):328–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13121.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Hämmerle CH, Araújo MG, Simion M, Osteology Consensus Group 2011. Evidence-based knowledge on the biology and treatment of extraction sockets. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012;23(Suppl 5):80–2. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02370.x.. Review. Erratum in: Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012 May;23(5):641

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. MacBeth N, Trullenque-Eriksson A, Donos N, Mardas N. Hard and soft tissue changes following alveolar ridge preservation: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017;28(8):982–1004. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12911.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Willenbacher M, Al-Nawas B, Berres M, Kämmerer PW, Schiegnitz E. The effects of alveolar ridge preservation: a meta-analysis. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2016;18(6):1248–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12364.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Avila-Ortiz G, Elangovan S, Kramer KW, Blanchette D, Dawson DV. Effect of alveolar ridge preservation after tooth extraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent Res. 2014;93:950–8.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Mardas N, Trullenque-Eriksson A, MacBeth N, Petrie A, Donos N. Does ridge preservation following tooth extraction improve implant treatment outcomes: a systematic review: Group 4: therapeutic concepts & methods. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015;26(Suppl 11):180–201. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12639.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Horváth A, Mardas N, Mezzomo LA, Needleman IG, Donos N. Alveolar ridge preservation. A systematic review. Clin Oral Investig. 2013;17(2):341–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-012-0758-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. Morjaria KR, Wilson R, Palmer RM. Bone Healing after Tooth Extraction with or without an Intervention: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trial. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2014;16(1):1–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2012.00450.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. Horowitz R, Holtzclaw D, Rosen PS. A review on alveolar ridge preservation following tooth extraction. J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2012;12(3 Suppl):149–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1532-3382(12)70029-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. Artzi Z, Tal H, Dayan D. Porous bovine bone mineral in healing of human extraction sockets. Part 1: histomorphometric evaluations at 9 months. J Periodontol. 2000;71(6):1015–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  99. Araújo MG, Lindhe J. Socket grafting with the use of autologous bone: an experimental study in the dog. Clin Oral Impl Res. 2011;22:9–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01937.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  100. Jung RE, Ioannidis A, Hämmerle CHF, Thoma DS. Alveolar ridge preservation in the esthetic zone. Periodontol. 2018;77(1):165–75. https://doi.org/10.1111/prd.12209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  101. Nemcovsky CE, Winocur E, Pupkin J, Artzi Z. Sinus floor augmentation through a rotated palatal flap at the time of tooth extraction. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2004;24(2):177–83.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  102. Chiapasco M, Zaniboni M, Boisco M. Augmentation procedures for the rehabilitation of deficient edentulous ridges with oral implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006;17(suppl. 2):136–59.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  103. Esposito M, Grusovin MG, Coulthard P, Worthington HV. The efficacy of various bone augmentation procedures for dental implants: a Cochrane systematic review of randomized controlled clinical trials. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2006;21:696–710.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  104. Benic GI, Hammerle CH. Horizontal bone augmentation by means of guided bone regeneration. Periodontol. 2014;66:13–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  105. Chasioti E, Chiang TF, Drew HJ. Maintaining space in localized ridge augmentation using guided bone regeneration with tenting screw technology. Quintessence Int. 2013;44:763–71.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  106. Nyman S, Gottlow J, Lindhe J, Karring T, Wennstrom J. New attachment formation by guided tissue regeneration. J Periodontal Res. 1987;22:252–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  107. Polimeni G, Albandar JM, Wikesjö UME. Prognostic factors for alveolar regeneration: osteogenic potential of resident bone. J Clin Periodontol. 2004;31:840–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  108. Polimeni G, Xiropaidis AV, Wikesjo UM. Biology and principles of periodontal wound healing/regeneration. Periodontol 2000. 2006;41:30–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  109. Polimeni G, Koo KT, Qahash M, Xiropaidis AV, Albandar JM, Wikesjö UME. Prognostic factors for alveolar regeneration: effect of tissue occlusion on alveolar bone regeneration with guided tissue regeneration. J Clin Periodontol. 2004;31:730–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  110. Benic GI, Jung RE, Siegenthaler DW, Hammerle CH. Clinical and radiographic comparison of implants in regenerated or native bone: 5-year results. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009;20:507–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  111. Jung RE, Fenner N, Hammerle CH, Zitzmann NU. Long-term outcome of implants placed with guided bone regeneration (GBR) using resorbable and non-resorbable membranes after 12-14 years. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013;24:1065–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  112. Donos N, Mardas N, Chadha V. Clinical outcomes of implants following lateral bone augmentation: systematic assessment of available options (barrier membranes, bone grafts, split osteotomy). J Clin Periodontol. 2008;35(Suppl. 8):173–202.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  113. Rocchietta I, Fontana F, Simion M. Clinical outcomes of vertical bone augmentation to enable dental implant placement: a systematic review. J Clin Periodontol. 2008;35(Suppl. 8):203–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  114. Simion M, Fontana F, Rasperini G, Maiorana C. Vertical ridge augmentation by expanded-polytetrafluoroethylene membrane and a combination of intraoral autogenous bone graft and deproteinized anorganic bovine bone (Bio Oss). Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007;18:620–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  115. Simion M, Jovanovic SA, Trisi P, Scarano A, Piatelli A. Vertical ridge augmentation around dental implants using a membrane technique and autogenous bone or allografts in humans. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1998;18:8–23.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  116. Tinti C, Parma Benfenati S. Vertical ridge augmentation: surgical protocol and retrospective evaluation of 48 consecutively inserted implants. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1998;18:434–43.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  117. Tinti C, Parma Benfenati S. Treatment of peri-implant defects with the vertical ridge augmentation procedure: a patient report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2001;16:572–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  118. Artzi Z, Dayan D, Alpern Y, Nemcovsky CE. Vertical ridge augmentation using xenogenic material supported by a configured titanium mesh: clinicohistopathologic and histochemical study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2003;18:440–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  119. Roccuzzo M, Ramieri G, Bunino M, Berrone S. Autogenous bone graft alone or associated with titanium mesh for vertical alveolar ridge augmentation: a controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007;18:286–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  120. Beitlitum I, Sebaoun A, Nemcovsky CE, Slutzkey S. Lateral bone augmentation in narrow posterior mandibles, description of a novel approach, and analysis of results. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2018;20(2):96–101. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12580.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  121. Le B, Rohrer MD, Prasad HS. Screw "tent-pole" grafting technique for reconstruction of large vertical alveolar ridge defects using human mineralized allograft for implant site preparation. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010;68(2):428–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2009.04.059.. Erratum in: J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010 Apr;68(4):953

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  122. Llambés F, Silvestre FJ, Caffesse R. Vertical bone regeneration with bioabsorbable barriers. J Periodontol. 2007;78:2036–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  123. Merli M, Bernardelli F, Esposito M. Horizontal and vertical ridge augmentation: a novel approach using osteosynthesis microplates, bone grafts, and resorbable barriers. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2006;26:581–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  124. Merli M, Moscatelli M, Mariotti G, Rotundo R, Bernardelli F, Nieri M. Bone level variation after vertical ridge augmentation: resorbable barriers versus titanium-reinforced barriers. A 6-year double-blind randomized clinical trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014;29(4):905–13. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.320.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  125. Wessing B, Lettner S, Zechner W. Guided bone regeneration with collagen membranes and particulate graft materials: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2018;33(1):87–100. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.5461.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  126. Naenni N, Schneider D, Jung RE, Hüsler J, Hämmerle CHF, Thoma DS. Randomized clinical study assessing two membranes for guided bone regeneration of peri-implant bone defects: clinical and histological outcomes at 6 months. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017;28(10):1309–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12977.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  127. Merli M, Merli I, Raffaelli E, Pagliaro U, Nastri L. Nieri M. Bone augmentation at implant dehiscences and fenestrations. A systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2016;9(1):11–32.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  128. Simion M, Masitano U, Salvato A. Treatment of dehiscences and fenestration around dental implants using resorbable and non-resorbable membranes associated with bone autografts: a comparative clinical study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1997;12:159–67.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  129. Nowzari H, Matian F, Slots J. Periodontal pathogens on polytetrafluoroethylene membrane for guided tissue regeneration inhibit healing. J Clin Periodontol. 1995;22(6):469–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  130. Tal H, Kozlovsky A, Artzi Z, Nemcovsky CE, Moses O. Cross-linked and non-cross-linked collagen barrier membranes disintegrate following surgical exposure to the oral environment: a histological study in the cat. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008;19:760–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  131. Tal H, Kozlovsky A, Artzi Z, Nemcovsky CE, Moses O. Long-term bio-degradation of cross-linked and non-cross-linked collagen barriers in human guided bone regeneration. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008;19:295–302.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  132. Hämmerle CH, Chiantella GC, Karring T, Lang NP. The effect of deproteinized bovine bone mineral on bone regeneration around titanium dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1998;9:151–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  133. Schlegel AK, Mohler H, Busch F, Mehl A. Preclinical and clinical studies of a collagen membrane (BioGide). Biomaterials. 1997;18:535–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  134. Park S-H, Lee K-w, Oh T-J, Misch CE, Shotwell J, Wang H-L. Effect of absorbable membranes on sandwich bone augmentation. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008;19:32–41.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  135. Schwarz F, Rothamel D, Herten M, Wűstefeld M, Sager M, Ferrari D, Becker J. Immunohistochemical characterization of guided bone regeneration at a dehiscence-type defect using different barrier membranes: an experimental study in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008;19:402–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  136. Merli M, Migani M, Bernardelli F, Esposito M. Vertical bone augmentation with dental implant placement: efficacy and complications associated with 2 different techniques. A retrospective cohort study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2006;21:600–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  137. Kozlovsky A, Aboodi G, Moses O, Tal H, Artzi Z, Weinreb M, Nemcovsky CE. Bio-degradation of a resorbable collagen membrane (Bio-Gide®) applied in a double-layer technique in rats. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009;20:1116–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  138. Kim SH, Kim DY, Kim KH, Ku Y, Rhyu IC, Lee YM. The efficacy of a double-layer collagen membrane technique for overlaying block grafts in a rabbit calvarium model. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009;20:1124–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  139. von Arx T, Broggini N, Storgärd Jensen S, Bornstein MM, Schenk RK, Buser D. Membrane durability and tissue response of different bioresorbable barrier membranes: A histologic study in the rabbit calvarium. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2005;20:843–53.

    Google Scholar 

  140. Moses O, Vitrial D, Aboodi G, Sculean A, Tal H, Kozlovsky A, Artzi Z, Weinreb M, Nemcovsky CE. Biodegradation of three different collagen membranes in the rat calvarium: a comparative study. J Periodontol. 2008;79:905–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  141. Adeyemo WL, Reuther T, Bloch W, Korkmaz Y, Fischer JH, Zöller JE, Kuebler AC. Healing of onlay mandibular bone grafts covered with collagen membrane or bovine bone substitutes: a microscopical and immunohistochemical study in the sheep. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008;37:651–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  142. Bornstein MM, Heynen G, Bosshardt DD, Buser D. Effect of two bioabsorbable barrier membranes on bone regeneration of standardized defects in calvarial bone: a comparative histomorphometric study in pigs. J Periodontol. 2009;80:1289–99.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  143. Smiler D, Soltan M. The bone-grafting decision tree: a systematic methodology for achieving new bone. Implant Dent. 2006;15:122–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  144. Rothamel D, Schwartz F, Sager M, Herten M, Sculean A, Becker J. Biodegradation of differently cross-linked collagen membranes: an experimental study in the rat. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2005;16:369–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  145. Bunyaratavej P, Wang HL. Collagen membranes: a review. J Periodontol. 2001;72:215–29.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  146. Brunel G, Piantoni P, Elharar F, Benque E, Marin P, Zahedi S. Regeneration of rat calvarial defects using a bioabsorbable membrane technique: influence of collagen cross-linking. J Periodontol. 1996;67:1342–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  147. Schwarz F, Rothamel D, Herten M, Sager M, Becker J. Angiogenesis pattern of native and cross-linked collagen membranes: an immunohistochemical study in the rat. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006;17(4):403–9.

    Google Scholar 

  148. Artzi Z, Nemcovsky CE, Tal H, Kozlovsky A. Timing of implant placement and augmentation with bone replacement material: clinical assessment at 8 and 16 months. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2013;15(1):121–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2011.00421.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  149. Artzi Z, Nemcovsky CE, Tal H, Weinberg E, Weinreb M, Prasad H, Rohrer MD, Kozlovsky A. Simultaneous versus two-stage implant placement and guided bone regeneration in the canine: histomorphometry at 8 and 16 months. J Clin Periodontol. 2010;37(11):1029–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2010.01621.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  150. Simion M, Dahlin C, Rocchietta I, Stavropoulos A, Sanchez R, Karring T. Vertical ridge augmentation with guided bone regeneration in association with dental implants: an experimental study in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007;18(1):86–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  151. Zerbo IR, de Lange GL, Joldersma M, Bronckers AL, Burger EH. Fate of monocortical bone blocks grafted in the human maxilla: a histological and histomorphometric study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2003;14:759–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  152. Aghaloo TL, Moy PK. Which hard tissue augmentation techniques are the most successful in furnishing bony support for implant placement? Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2007;22(Suppl):49–70.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  153. Feuille F, Knapp CI, Brunsvold MA, Mellonig JT. Clinical and histologic evaluation of bone-replacement grafts in the treatment of localized alveolar ridge defects. Part 1: mineralized freeze-dried bone allograft. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2003;23:29–35.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  154. Froum SJ, Wallace SS, Elian N, Cho SC, Tarnow DP. Comparison of mineralized cancellous bone allograft (Puros) and anorganic bovine bone matrix (Bio-Oss) for sinus augmentation: histomorphometry at 26 and 32 weeks after grafting. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2006;26:543–51.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  155. Gapski R, Neiva R, Oh TJ, Wang H-L. Histologic analysis of human mineralized bone grafting material in sinus elevation procedures: a case series. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2006;26:59–69.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  156. Kolerman R, Tal H, Moses O. Histomorphometric analysis of newly formed bone after maxillary sinus floor augmentation using ground cortical bone allograft and internal collagen membrane. J Periodontol. 2008;79:2104–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  157. Nissan J, Ghelfan O, Mardinger O, Calderon S, Chaushu G. Efficacy of cancellous block allograft augmentation prior to implant placement in the posterior atrophic mandible. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2011;13(4):279–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00219.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  158. Ersanli S, Olgac V, Leblebicioglu B. Histologic analysis of alveolar bone following guided bone regeneration. J Periodontol. 2004;75:750–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  159. Polimeni G, Koo KT, Qahash M, Xiropaidis AV, Albandar JM, Wikesjö UME. Prognostic factors for alveolar regeneration: effect of a space-providing biomaterial on guided tissue regeneration. J Clin Periodontol. 2004;31:730–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  160. Wang HL, Misch C, Neiva RF. “Sandwich” bone augmentation technique: rational and report of pilot cases. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2004;24:232–45.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  161. Cammack GV 2nd, Nevins M, Clem DS 3rd, Hatch JP, Mellonig JT. Histologic evaluation of mineralized and demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft for ridge and sinus augmentations. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2005;25:231–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  162. Araújo MG, Sonohara M, Hayacibara R, Cardaropoli G, Lindhe J. Lateral ridge augmentation by the use of grafts comprised of autologous bone or a biomaterial. An experiment in the dog. J Clin Periodontol. 2002;29(12):1122–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  163. Artzi Z, Weinreb M, Givol N, Rohrer MD, Nemcovsky CE, Prasad HS, Tal H. Biomaterial resorption rate and healing site morphology of inorganic bovine bone and beta-tricalcium phosphate in the canine: a 24-month longitudinal histologic study and morphometric analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004;19(3):357–68.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  164. Jensen SS, Bosshardt DD, Gruber R, Buser D. Long-term stability of contour augmentation in the esthetic zone: histologic and histomorphometric evaluation of 12 human biopsies 14 to 80 months after augmentation. J Periodontol. 2014;85(11):1549–56. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2014.140182.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  165. Chappuis V, Cavusoglu Y, Buser D, von Arx T. Lateral ridge augmentation using autogenous block grafts and guided bone regeneration: a 10-year prospective case series study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2017;19(1):85–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12438.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  166. De Stavola L, Tunkel J. A new approach to maintenance of regenerated autogenous bone volume: delayed relining with xenograft and resorbable membrane. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2013;28(4):1062–7. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.2726.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  167. Doblin JM, Salkin LM, Mellado JR, Freedman AL, Stein MD. A histologic evaluation of localized ridge augmentation utilizing DFDBA in combination with e-PTFE membranes and stainless steel bone pins in humans. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1996;16:120–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  168. Fugazzotto PA. Ridge augmentation with titanium screws and guided tissue regeneration: technique and report of a case. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1993;8:335–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  169. Hempton TJ, Fugazzotto PA. Ridge augmentation utilizing guided tissue regeneration, titanium screws, freeze-dried bone and tricalcium phosphate: clinical report. Implant Dent. 1994;3:35–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  170. Merli M, Migani M, Esposito M. Vertical ridge augmentation with autogenous bone grafts: resorbable barriers supported by ostheosynthesis plates versus titanium-reinforced barriers. A preliminary report of a blinded, randomized controlled clinical trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2007;22:373–82.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  171. Daga D, Mehrotra D, Mohammad S, Chandra S, Singh G, Mehrotra D. Tentpole technique for bone regeneration in vertically deficient alveolar ridges: A prospective study. Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2018;8(1):20–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobcr.2017.11.002.

    Google Scholar 

  172. Daga D, Mehrotra D, Mohammad S, Singh G, Natu SM. Tentpole technique for bone regeneration in vertically deficient alveolar ridges: a review. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2015;5(2):92–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobcr.2015.03.001.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  173. Mir-Mari J, Wui H, Jung RE, Hammerle CH, Benic GI. Influence of blinded wound closure on the volume stability of different GBR materials: an in vitro cone-beam computed tomographic examination. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016;27:258–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  174. Rompen EH, Biewer R, Vanheusden A, Zahedi S, Nusgens B. The influence of cortical perforations and of space filling with peripheral blood on the kinetics of guided bone generation. A comparative histometric study in the rat. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1999;10:85–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  175. Slotte C, Lundgren D. Impact of cortical perforations of contiguous donor bone in a guided bone augmentation procedure: an experimental study in the rabbit skull. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2002;4:1–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Periodontology and Dental Implantology, Maurice and Gabriela Goldschleger School of Dental Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel

    Carlos E. Nemcovsky & Ilan Beitlitum

  2. Department of Biomedical, Surgical and Dental Sciences, Università degli Studi di Milano, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Dental Clinic, Milan, Italy

    Massimo del Fabbro & Silvio Taschieri

Authors
  1. Carlos E. Nemcovsky
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Massimo del Fabbro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ilan Beitlitum
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Silvio Taschieri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carlos E. Nemcovsky .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Endodontology, School of Dental Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel

    Igor Tsesis

  2. Department of Periodontology and Implant Dentistry, The Maurice and Gabriela Goldschleger, School of Dental Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel

    Carlos E. Nemcovsky

  3. Department of Oral- Rehabilitation, School of Dental Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel

    Joseph Nissan

  4. Department of Endodontology, School of Dental Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel

    Eyal Rosen

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Nemcovsky, C.E., del Fabbro, M., Beitlitum, I., Taschieri, S. (2019). Treatment Alternatives Following Extraction of Teeth with Periodontal-Endodontic Lesions. In: Tsesis, I., Nemcovsky, C., Nissan, J., Rosen, E. (eds) Endodontic-Periodontal Lesions. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10725-3_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10725-3_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-10724-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-10725-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation