Abstract
This chapter elaborates on creative hubs in Istanbul by taking into consideration four of its music venues, which give stage to various contemporary forms of eclectic genres. It argues that the actors/entrepreneurs of these hubs engage in face-to-face interactions and through Internet technologies with a diverse range of musicians overseas, forming networks transnationally. Babylon, Salon, Minimüzikhol and Peyote in the district of Beyoğlu in Istanbul are the venues which have been scrutinized. Such an engagement and performativity through these hubs articulate the city into various other diverse places and urban topographies, cultures and lifestyles. In this respect, Deleuze and Guattari’s concept of ‘rhizome’ has been utilized to indicate how performativity through these hubs can stand in contrast to the political representations of the contemporary government and its implementation of policies. Babylon and Salon stand more hierarchized, and thus institutionalized, in comparison with Minimüzikhol and Peyote. Nevertheless, a common ground that can be made is that these actors/entrepreneurs can be considered as the curators of these hubs, where the regulatory regime which they had been operating under is becoming destroyed.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Accordingly, nineteen in-depth, semi-structured and open-ended interviews were conducted with various creative actors related to the music venues discussed throughout this chapter. Each interview ranged approximately 35–90 minutes and they were carried out from February 2011 to November 2012. The interviewees who have been anonymously utilized in this chapter have been numbered in order of their initial appearance of the text.
- 2.
For instance, in 2012 summer, Pozitif was organizing its 11th annual ‘Efes One Love’ music festival; however the municipality of the district was furious about the main sponsor being the Turkish beer company Efes. Pozitif, taking out the name from its poster in the following years arranged this particular festival under ‘One Love’ in a different location in Istanbul. This time, picture of a beer cap writing ‘hayat bu kapağın altında’ (meaning ‘life is under this cap’ in Turkish), obviously signifying Efes and beer, became part of its new logo.
- 3.
At this point, interviewee-9 in particular underlined this concept himself.
References
Bali, R. N. (2006). Sonuç (Conclusion). In D. Behar & T. Islam (Eds.), İstanbul’da Soylulaştırma: Eski Kentin Yeni Sahipleri (Gentrification in Istanbul: The new owners of the old city) (pp. 203–210). Istanbul: İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları.
Bonta, M., & Protevi, J. (2006). Deleuze and geophilosophy: A guide and glossary (2nd ed.). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Clare, K. (2013). The essential role of place within the creative industries: Boundaries, networks and play. Cities,34, 52–57.
Crossley, N. (2015). Networks of sound, style and subversion: The punk and post-punk worlds of Manchester, London, Liverpool and Sheffield, 1975–80. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Crossley, N., & Bottero, W. (2015). Social spaces of music: Introduction. Cultural Sociology,9(1), 3–19.
Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (2007). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia (12th ed.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Hracs, B. J. (2012). A creative industry in transition: The rise of digitally driven independent music production. Growth and Change,43(3), 442–461.
Hracs, B. J. (2016). Working harder and working smarter: The survival strategies of contemporary independent musicians. In B. J. Hracs, M. Seman, & T. E. Virani (Eds.), The production and consumption of music in the digital age (pp. 41–55). New York: Routledge.
Hracs, B. J., Seman, M., & Virani, T. E. (2016). Introduction: The evolving economic geography of music. In B. J. Hracs, M. Seman, & T. E. Virani (Eds.), The production and consumption of music in the digital age (pp. 3–8). New York: Routledge.
Ince, A. (2006). Asmalımescit’te Kültür Endüstrisi Destekli Yer Değişim (Replacement in Asmalımescit by the support of culture industry). In D. Behar & T. Islam (Eds.), İstanbul’da Soylulaştırma: Eski Kentin Yeni Sahipleri (Gentrification in Istanbul: The new owners of the old city) (pp. 99–111). Istanbul: İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları.
Ince, A. (2008). Yeniden Asmalımescit; Girişimciler ve Evrimleri (Asmalımescit again; entrepreneurs and their evolutions). İstanbul –magazine, 62, 52–54.
Kalkandelen, Z. (2017). Müzik Sektörüne Ağır Darbe: Yeni Türkiye Yeni Beyoğlu (A severe blow to the music industry: New Turkey New Beyoğlu). Journo. https://journo.com.tr/muzik-sektorune-agir-darbe. Accessed 24 February 2017.
Krims, A. (2007). Music and urban geography. New York: Routledge.
Lampel, J., & Germain, O. (2016). Creative industries as hubs of new organizational and business practices. Journal of Business Research,69(7), 2327–2333.
Pratt, A. C. (2009). Urban regeneration: From the “arts feel good” factor to the cultural economy: A case study of Hoxton, London. Urban Studies,46(5 & 6), 1041–1061.
Prior, N. (2015a). It’s a social thing, not a nature thing: Popular music practices in Reykjavík, Iceland. Cultural Sociology,9(1), 81–98.
Prior, N. (2015b). Beyond Napster: Popular music and the normal internet. In A. Bennett & S. Waksman (Eds.), The Sage handbook of popular music (pp. 493–507). London: Sage.
Rief, S. (2009). Club cultures: Boundaries, identities, and otherness. New York: Routledge.
Reynolds, S. (2011). Retromania: Pop culture’s addiction to its own past. New York: Faber and Faber.
Scott, M. (2017). “Hipster capitalism” in the age of austerity? Polanyi meets Bourdieu’s new petite bourgeoisie. Cultural Sociology,11(1), 60–76.
Thrift, N. (2000). Performing cultures in the new economy. Annals of the Association of American Geographers,90(4), 674–692.
Tironi, M. (2010). Gelleable spaces, eventful geographies: The case of Santiago’s experimental music scene. In I. Farías & T. Bender (Eds.), Urban assemblages: How actor-network theory changes urban studies (pp. 27–52). Abingdon: Routledge.
Virani, T. E. (2016). The resilience of a local music scene in Dalston, London. In B. J. Hracs, M. Seman, & T. E. Virani (Eds.), The production and consumption of music in the digital age (pp. 101–113). New York: Routledge.
Virani, T. E., & Malem, W. (2015). Re-articulating the creative hub concept as a model for business support in the local creative economy: The case of Mare Street in Hackney (Creativeworks London Working Paper Series Number 12).
Watson, A., & Beaverstock, J. V. (2016). Transnational freelancing: Ephemeral creative projects and mobility in the music recording industry. Environment and Planning A,48(7), 1428–1446.
Watson, A., Hoyler, M., & Mager, C. (2009). Spaces and networks of musical creativity in the city. Geography Compass,3(2), 856–878.
White, J. (2017). Urban music and entrepreneurship: Beats, rhymes and young people’s enterprise. London: Routledge.
Yener, Z. (2009). Babylon on: Babylon Hakkında Bir Kitap (A book about Babylon—For its initial ten years between 1999–2009). Istanbul: Stil Matbaa.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mert, C. (2019). Istanbul’s Sounds and Its ‘Creative’ Hubs: Creative Actors Articulating the City into Transnational Networks Through Music. In: Gill, R., Pratt, A.C., Virani, T.E. (eds) Creative Hubs in Question. Dynamics of Virtual Work. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10653-9_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10653-9_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-10652-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-10653-9
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)