Abstract
This chapter examines the management of visa policy implementation. State-bound agendas and diplomatic concerns inform the management of the visa application process, which is not merely the realm of technicalities. History affects the ways in which consulate premises materialize Belgian, French, and Italian sovereignty in Morocco. The cross-national differences in the visa application process can be understood only if one considers that process to be ‘street-level diplomacy.’ The chapter illuminates the national organizational conditions in which EU visa policy is implemented. It brings insights that nuance the claims about the externalization of migration control via EU visa policy mainly because the Ministry of the Interior in the home countries is active in various visa processes. Taking account of the humans and non-humans involved in visa-examining processes is a first necessary step toward the comparative analysis of day-to-day implementation practice. The different uses of non-humans (Schengen and national technological toolboxes) are particularly effective at showing the different understandings of decision-making as a more or less objectivized process. There exist also different understandings of the aims ascribed to the same Schengen technological tool (the Schengen Information System, the Visa Information System, the emails sent within the frame of local Schengen cooperation).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
See http://qualitapa.gov.it/it/iniziative/mettiamoci-la-faccia/. Accessed on 29 June 2018.
- 2.
The OFII is the French office for immigration and integration (Office Français de l’Immigration et de l’Intégration). In Casablanca, the OFII mission is in charge of procedures related to visas (work and family reunification) as well as the French language and civilization tests and the physical performed by a doctor required for some types of visas.
- 3.
- 4.
The uses of the Régistre National and VisaNet and the ways in which they affect decision-making processes are discussed extensively in the chapter “The Making of Decisions”.
References
Bigo, D., & Guild, E. (2003). La mise à l’écart des étrangers: la logique du visa Schengen. Paris: L’Harmattan.
Dubois, V. (1999). La vie au guichet. Relation administrative et traitement de la misère. Paris: Economica.
Edelman, M. (1964). The Symbolic Uses of Politics. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Guild, E. (2001). Moving the Borders of Europe. Inaugural Lecture, Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen. https://cmr.jur.ru.nl/cmr/docs/oratie.eg.pdf. Accessed 15 February 2018.
Guiraudon, V. (2003). Before the EU Border: Remote Control of the “Huddled Masses”. In K. Groenendijk, E. Guild, & P. Minderhoud (Eds.), In Search of Europe’s Borders (pp. 191–214). The Hague: Kluwer Law International.
Infantino, F. (2016). Outsourcing Border Control: Politics and Practice of Contracted Visa Policy in Morocco. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Lipsky, M. (1980). Street-Level Bureaucracy. Dilemmas of Individuals in Public Services. New York: Russel Sage Foundation.
Noiriel, G. (1988). Le creuset français. Paris: Seuil.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Infantino, F. (2019). The Politics of Management. In: Schengen Visa Implementation and Transnational Policymaking . Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10647-8_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10647-8_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-10646-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-10647-8
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)