Abstract
Interoception as the ability of human beings to sense their internal body feelings is far beyond visceral sensations and comprises a variety of sensory modalities, including metabolic, immunologic, and autonomic status. The key area onto which interoceptive sensations project is the insular cortex in the brain. Owing to this ability, the posterior portion of the insula makes functional connections to the thalamocortical hubs as well as areas within the limbic system and the amygdala, which is historically known for its role in the perception of anger and fear. The prefrontal gyrus, anterior cingulate cortex, and several other neocortical areas add cognitive input to interoceptive perception. Granular cortices are core modulating units of interoception, while agranular cortices are directly responsible to drive perception and the resulting action that is derived from interoceptive decision making. These cortical outbound communications synchronize the activity of amygdalo-insular region with other cognitive networks and inform the rest of the brain about the interoceptive predictions and sensations, all to produce an integrated representation of internal and external body feelings and a unique form of consciousness. The granular interoceptive cortices are less prone to predictive errors, meaning a more precise interoception and factual interpretation of internal body feelings in relation to sensory input. Affective parts of our consciousness, or what we commonly call an internal sensation, enroot from predictions within the interoceptive system that might or might not be true predictions, but are congruent with overall exteroceptive and interoceptive mood of the body.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Barrett LF, Simmons WK. Interoceptive predictions in the brain. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2015;16:419.
Craig AD. How do you feel–now? The anterior insula and human awareness. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2009;10(1):59–70.
Uddin LQ. Salience processing and insular cortical function and dysfunction. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2015;16(1):55–61.
Singer T, Frith C. The painful side of empathy. Nat Neurosci. 2005;8(7):845–6.
Shah P, Catmur C, Bird G. Emotional decision-making in autism spectrum disorder: the roles of interoception and alexithymia. Molecular autism. 2016;7:43.
Menon V, Uddin LQ. Saliency, switching, attention and control: a network model of insula function. Brain Struct Funct. 2010;214(5–6):655–67.
Cauda F, D’Agata F, Sacco K, Duca S, Geminiani G, Vercelli A. Functional connectivity of the insula in the resting brain. NeuroImage. 2011;55(1):8–23.
Kleint NI, Wittchen HU, Lueken U. Probing the interoceptive network by listening to heartbeats: an fMRI study. PLoS One. 2015;10(7):e0133164.
Roy AK, Fudge JL, Kelly C, Perry JS, Daniele T, Carlisi C, et al. Intrinsic functional connectivity of amygdala-based networks in adolescent generalized anxiety disorder. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2013;52(3):290–9.e2.
Hamm LL, Jacobs RH, Johnson MW, Fitzgerald DA, Fitzgerald KD, Langenecker SA, et al. Aberrant amygdala functional connectivity at rest in pediatric anxiety disorders. Biol Mood Anxiety Disord. 2014;4(1):15.
Grossi D, Di Vita A, Palermo L, Sabatini U, Trojano L, Guariglia C. The brain network for self-feeling: a symptom-lesion mapping study. Neuropsychologia. 2014;63:92–8.
Georgiou E, Mai S, Fernandez KC, Pollatos O. I see neither your fear, nor your sadness – Interoception in adolescents. Conscious Cogn. 2018;60:52–61.
Pollatos O, Laubrock J, Wittmann M. Interoceptive focus shapes the experience of time. PLoS One. 2014;9(1):e86934.
Werner NS, Schweitzer N, Meindl T, Duschek S, Kambeitz J, Schandry R. Interoceptive awareness moderates neural activity during decision-making. Biol Psychol. 2013;94(3):498–506.
Wiebking C, de Greck M, Duncan NW, Tempelmann C, Bajbouj M, Northoff G. Interoception in insula subregions as a possible state marker for depression-an exploratory fMRI study investigating healthy, depressed and remitted participants. Front Behav Neurosci. 2015;9:82.
Caseras X, Murphy K, Mataix-Cols D, Lopez-Sola M, Soriano-Mas C, Ortriz H, et al. Anatomical and functional overlap within the insula and anterior cingulate cortex during interoception and phobic symptom provocation. Hum Brain Mapp. 2013;34(5):1220–9.
Cerliani L, Thomas RM, Jbabdi S, Siero JC, Nanetti L, Crippa A, et al. Probabilistic tractography recovers a rostrocaudal trajectory of connectivity variability in the human insular cortex. Hum Brain Mapp. 2012;33(9):2005–34.
Schulz SM. Neural correlates of heart-focused interoception: a functional magnetic resonance imaging meta-analysis. Philos Trans R Soc London Ser B Biol Sci. 2016;371(1708):20160018.
Kirk U, Gu X, Harvey AH, Fonagy P, Montague PR. Mindfulness training modulates value signals in ventromedial prefrontal cortex through input from insular cortex. NeuroImage. 2014;100:254–62.
Khalsa SS, Feinstein JS, Li W, Feusner JD, Adolphs R, Hurlemann R. Panic anxiety in humans with bilateral amygdala lesions: pharmacological induction via cardiorespiratory interoceptive pathways. J Neurosci. 2016;36(12):3559.
Knuepfer MM, Eismann A, Schutze I, Stumpf H, Stock G. Responses of single neurons in amygdala to interoceptive and exteroceptive stimuli in conscious cats. Am J Physiol. 1995;268(3 Pt 2):R666–75.
Nicholson AA, Sapru I, Densmore M, Frewen PA, Neufeld RW, Theberge J, et al. Unique insula subregion resting-state functional connectivity with amygdala complexes in posttraumatic stress disorder and its dissociative subtype. Psychiatry Res. 2016;250:61–72.
Rempel-Clower NL, Barbas H. The laminar pattern of connections between prefrontal and anterior temporal cortices in the Rhesus monkey is related to cortical structure and function. Cereb Cortex (New York, NY: 1991). 2000;10(9):851–65.
Shipp S. Neural elements for predictive coding. Front Psychol. 2016;7:1792.
Friston K. The free-energy principle: a unified brain theory? Nat Rev Neurosci. 2010;11(2):127–38.
García-Cabezas M, Barbas H. Area 4 has layer IV in adult primates. Eur J Neurosci. 2014;39(11):1824–34.
Venkatraman A, Edlow BL, Immordino-Yang MH. The brainstem in emotion: a review. Front Neuroanat. 2017;11:15.
Frot M, Faillenot I, Mauguiere F. Processing of nociceptive input from posterior to anterior insula in humans. Hum Brain Mapp. 2014;35(11):5486–99.
Simmons WK, Rapuano KM, Kallman SJ, Ingeholm JE, Miller B, Gotts SJ, et al. Category-specific integration of homeostatic signals in caudal but not rostral human insula. Nat Neurosci. 2013;16(11):1551–2.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rahmani, M., Rahmani, F. (2019). Cortex, Insula, and Interoception. In: Rezaei, N., Saghazadeh, A. (eds) Biophysics and Neurophysiology of the Sixth Sense. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10620-1_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10620-1_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-10619-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-10620-1
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)