Skip to main content

Physical Branding and Heritage

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Cultural Urban Heritage

Part of the book series: The Urban Book Series ((UBS))

Abstract

Physical branding is a method of managing architectural/urban systems which, in its significance, design and purpose, represents individual spatial identities and can affect the competitive identity of the site. The aim of the research presented in this chapter is to identify physical branding models in the field of cultural heritage and the designed natural environment in relation to the renewal of heritage and/or the application of urban modernity. The expected results are typologically defined physical branding models. The networking of specific spatial characteristics, through targeted architectural/urban planning, contributes to the establishment of individual spatial identities which, in their significance, affect competitive identity. The obtained results may be applied to strategic planning procedures, both in spatial planning and in the planning of economic development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Pavković (2018) Doctoral thesis: “Method of physical branding—the architecture and urban development impact on the competitive identity of the place”.

  2. 2.

    The term and concept of a single spatial identity, which implies an individual architectural/urbanistic approach, is introduced in scientific terminology in the aforementioned doctoral work.

  3. 3.

    The concept of competitive identity has been developed by Simon Anholt in Competitive identity: the new brand management for nations, cities and regions, published in 2007, and based on the concept of national identity as the comparative advantage of a particular country in a globalised world. Anholt’s model contains six factors of competitive identity that cover the key segments of social and economic activities, directly related to the creation of a nation’s reputation in the perception of target groups: tourism, economy, politics, investment, culture and people.

  4. 4.

    Individual spatial identity is an architectural and urbanistic intervention whose significance and characteristics differentiate it from others, and it holds a unique place in the perception of the general and targeted public. Networked in a system, and individually dependent on the function, individual spatial identities affect place competitiveness.

  5. 5.

    The instruments used for embedding the values of heritage in the methodology for making plans and codified by legal regulations are not sufficient to protect the values of intangible heritage, so it is only established as a value in name, although without concrete measures for implementing this protection.

  6. 6.

    Since 2000, the European Commission has had several key funds to strengthen the competitiveness of the member states. The most used and important are the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF), the Cohesion Fund and the European Social Fund (ESF). The ERDF aims to strengthen economic and social cohesion in the European Commission by correcting imbalances between its regions (European Commission 2014).

  7. 7.

    For additional information on the method, see Horvat and Pavković (2013).

  8. 8.

    The mentioned examples were studied in more detail within the scope of the doctoral research, partially conducted as part of the science-research project Heritage UrbanismUrban and Spatial Models for Revival and Enhancement of Cultural Heritage, 2032HERU/20142018.

  9. 9.

    Project leader: Tomislav Krajina; Situs d.o.o.

  10. 10.

    Since 2016, St. Michael’s Fortress and the Barone Fortress have been considered a single public institution under the name Fortress of Culture, which keeps records of the sum of visitors at both these locations.

  11. 11.

    Project leaders: Damir Lasinović, Marko Paić, Ivona Ivčević and Ivana Lozić; ARX d.o.o.

  12. 12.

    Project leader: Nikola Bašić; co-leader: Zvonimir Bušić.

  13. 13.

    According to data provided by the Public Institution for Protected Area Management in the County of Šibenik and Knin (information published in the media).

  14. 14.

    According to data provided by Šibenik Tourist Board, overnight stays increased by 9% in 2016 compared with 2015.

References

  • Anholt S (2007) Competitive identity: the new brand management for nations, cities and regions. Palgrave Macmillan, New York (ISBN 978-1-349-35243-2)

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun E (2008) City marketing: towards an integrated approach. Doctoral thesis, Erasmus University Rotterdam (ISBN 978-90-5892-180-2)

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2014) Operational programme competitiveness and cohesion 2014–2020. http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/hr/atlas/programmes/2014-2020/Republic%20of%20Croatia/2014hr16m1op001. Accessed 5 June 2018

  • Horvat J, Pavković M (2013) Prostorno programska agenda/Physical planning and programming agenda: mapping and programming spatial potentials as a basis for integral development. Prostor: znanstveni časopis za arhitekturu i urbanizam 46(2/21):292–301 (ISSN 1330-0652)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kavaratzis M (2004) From city marketing to city branding: towards a theoretical framework for developing city brands. Place Branding 1(1):58–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kavaratzis M, Ashworth GJ (2005) City branding: an affective assertion of identity or a transitory marketing trick? Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie 96(5):506–514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kavaratzis M, Ashworth GJ (2008) Place marketing: how did we get here and where are we going? J Place Manage Dev 2(1):150–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Obad Šćitaroci M (2018) Heritage as an active space and spatial resource. In: Grifoni RC, D’Onofrio R, Sargolini M (eds) Quality of life in urban landscapes—in search of a decision support system. Springer, Cham, pp 341–348

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Paliaga M (2007) Branding i konkurentnost gradova. Independent edn. Rovinj (ISBN 978-953-99569-1-0)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavković M (2018) Method of physical branding—architecture and urban development impact on the competitive identity of the place. Doctoral thesis, University of Zagreb, Faculty of Architecture

    Google Scholar 

  • van den Berg L, van de Meer J, Oligaar A (2006) The attractive city: catalyst of sustainable urban development. In: XVI Congreso de Estudios Vascos, Bilbao (2005), pp 485–491 (ISBN-10: 84-8419-022-6; ISBN 978-84-8419-022-6)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research is part of the scientific project “Heritage Urbanism—Urban and Spatial Planning Models for Revival and Enhancement of Cultural Heritage”. It is financed by the Croatian Science Foundation [HRZZ-2032] and carried out at the Faculty of Architecture, University of Zagreb.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marina Pavković .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Pavković, M., Horvat, J. (2019). Physical Branding and Heritage. In: Obad Šćitaroci, M., Bojanić Obad Šćitaroci, B., Mrđa, A. (eds) Cultural Urban Heritage. The Urban Book Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10612-6_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics