Abstract
Research has long been using analytical tools to describe the processes students engage in when solving non-routine mathematical problems. In this chapter we describe and discuss our progress on devising and implementing an analytical tool that aims to account for the use of technological tools by combining a mathematical problem solving model with a digital problem solving framework. By means of the Mathematical Problem Solving with Technology model (MPST) we report the case of Marco using technologies for solving two problems from a beyond school competition. Results show that Marco’s choice of the tools is grounded on an explicit knowledge of their affordances and how they enhance his mathematical thinking, mainly by triggering visual approaches that support the development of conceptual models for solving-and-expressing the solutions to the problems.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Borba, M. C., & Villarreal, M. E. (2005). Humans-with-media and the reorganization of mathematical thinking: Information and communication technologies, modeling, visualization and experimentation. New York, NY: Springer.
Carreira, S., Jones, K., Amado, N., Jacinto, H., & Nobre, S. (2016). Youngsters solving mathematical problems with technology. New York, NY: Springer.
Chemero, A. (2003). An outline of a theory of affordances. Ecological Psychology, 15(2), 181–195.
English, L., & Sriraman, B. (2010). Problem solving for the 21st century. In B. Sriraman & L. English (Eds.), Theories of mathematics education: Seeking new frontiers (pp. 263–290). Berlin: Springer.
Forgasz, H. J., Vale, C., & Ursini, S. (2010). Technology for mathematics education: Equity, access, and agency. In C. Hoyles & J-B. Lagrange (Eds.), Mathematics education and technology: Rethinking the terrain (pp. 385-404). New York, NY: Springer.
Greeno, J. (1994). Gibson’s affordances. Psychological Review, 101(2), 336–342.
Jacinto, H. (2017). A atividade de resolução de problemas de matemática com tecnologias e a fluência tecno-matemática de jovens do século XXI (Unpublished doctoral thesis). Instituto de Educação, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.
Jacinto, H. & Carreira, S. (2013). Beyond-school mathematical problem solving: a case of students-with-media. In A. Lindmeier, & A. Heinze (Eds.). Proceedings of the 37th Conference of the IGPME (Vol. 3, pp. 105–112). Kiel, Germany: PME.
Jacinto, H., & Carreira, S. (2015). Solving problems on the screen: Digital tools supporting solving-and-expressing. In N. Amado & S. Carreira (Eds.), Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Technology in Mathematics Teaching—ICTMT12 (pp. 412–420). Faro, Portugal: University of Algarve.
Jacinto, H., & Carreira, S. (2017). Mathematical problem solving with technology: The techno-mathematical fluency of a student-with-GeoGebra. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15(6), 1115–1136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-016-9728-8.
Jacinto, H., Carreira, S., & Mariotti, M. A. (2016). Mathematical problem solving with technology beyond the classroom: The use of unconventional tools and methods. In C. Csíkos, A. Rausch, & J. Szitányi (Eds.), Proceedings of the 40th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 3, pp. 27–34). Szeged, Hungary: PME.
Lesh, R., & Doerr, H. (2003). Foundations of a models and modeling perspective on mathematics teaching, learning, and problem solving. In R. Lesh & H. Doerr (Eds.), Beyond constructivism—Models and modeling perspectives on mathematics problem solving, learning, and teaching (pp. 3–33). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.
Lesh, R., & Zawojewski, J. (2007). Problem solving and modeling. In F. Lester (Ed.), The handbook of research on mathematics education (pp. 763–804). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing and NCTM.
Martin, A. (2006). A European framework for digital literacy. Digital Kompetanse, 2, 151–161.
Martin, A., & Grudziecki, J. (2006). DigEuLit: Concepts and tools for digital literacy development. Innovation in Teaching and Learning in Information and Computer Sciences, 5(4), 249–267.
Merriam, S. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Santos-Trigo, M., & Barrera-Mora, F. (2007). Contrasting and looking into some mathematics education frameworks. The Mathematics Educator, 10(1), 81–106.
Santos-Trigo, M., & Camacho-Machín, M. (2013). Framing the use of computational technology in problem solving approaches. The Mathematics Enthusiast, 1–2, 279–302.
Schoenfeld, A. (1985). Mathematical problem solving. New York: Academic Press.
Villarreal, M., & Borba, M. (2010). Collectives of humans-with-media in mathematics education: Notebooks, blackboards, calculators, computers and…notebooks throughout 100 years of ICMI. ZDM Mathematics Education, 42(1), 49–62.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Carreira, S., Jacinto, H. (2019). A Model of Mathematical Problem Solving with Technology: The Case of Marco Solving-and-Expressing Two Geometry Problems. In: Liljedahl, P., Santos-Trigo, M. (eds) Mathematical Problem Solving. ICME-13 Monographs. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10472-6_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10472-6_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-10471-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-10472-6
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)