Skip to main content

Quality Perspectives

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Quality
  • 636 Accesses

Abstract

The previous chapter showed that, in its totality, the concept of quality is enormously rich. It carries a number of meanings, some of which are in tension with each other. Although its ever-present connotation of something good is always attractive in social use, the concept of quality in toto is, if explicated, too big and unhandy to move around with. The only place where all meanings of quality meet is in the dictionary. In practice, people do not look up all these meanings; they usually talk about something less.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/meta-craftsmanship.html (Sept. 1, 2017).

References

  • Andresen, Emilie, and Maj Fjordside. 2015. Uklare Begreber, Store Forventninger og Nye Roller: Et Studie af Hverdagsrehabilitering som et Eksempel på Samskabelse [Unclear Concepts, Big Expectations and New Roles: A Study of Everyday Rehabilitation as an Example of Cocreation]. Thesis, Department of Political Science, University of Copenhagen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antal, Ariane B., Michael Hutter, and David Stark. 2015. Moments of Valuation: Exploring Sites of Dissonance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Baier, Vicki E., James G. March, and Harald Sætren. 1986. Implementation and Ambiguity. Scandinavian Journal of Management Studies 2 (3/4): 179–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateson, Gregory. 1972. Steps to an Ecology of Mind. New York: Ballantine Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, Martin W. 2016. A Word From the Parting Editor, 4760 Pages Down the Line. Public Understanding of Science 25 (2): 130–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Zygmunt. 1983. Industrialism, Consumerism and Power. Theory, Culture and Society 1 (3): 32–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bereiter, Carl. 2002. Education and Mind in the Knowledge Age. Mahwah: L. Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergh, Andreas. 2011. Why Quality in Education – and What Quality? – A Linguistic Analysis of the Concept of Quality in Swedish Government Texts. Education Inquiry 2 (4): 709–723.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beuscart, Jean-Samuel, and Kevin Mellet. 2013. Competing Quality Conventions in the French Online Display Advertising Market. Journal of Cultural Economy 6 (4): 402–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biesta, Gert. 2007. Why ‘What Works’ Won’t Work: Evidence-Based Practice and the Democratic Deficit in Educational Research. Educational Theory 57 (1): 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Wendy. 2015. Undoing the Demos. New York: Zone Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunsson, Nils. 1989. The Organization of Hypocrisy: Talk, Decisions and Actions in Organizations. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunsson, Nils, and Bengt Jacobsson, eds. 2000. A World of Standards. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chavarro, Diego, Puay Tang, and Ismael Ràfols. 2017. Why Researchers Publish in Non-mainstream Journals: Training, Knowledge Bridging, and Gap Filling. Research Policy 46 (9): 1666–1689.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheney, George, Jill J. McMillan, and Roy Schwartzman. 1997. Should We Buy the “Student-As-Consumer” Metaphor? The Montana Professor 7 (3): 8–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, Thomas D., and Donald T. Campbell. 1986. The Causal Assumptions of Quasi-Experimental Practice: The Origins of Quasi-Experimental Practice. Synthese 68 (1): 141–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlberg, Magnus, and Evert Vedung. 2001. Demokrati och Brukarutvärdering [Democracy and User Evaluation]. Lund: Studentlitteratur.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dean, James W., Jr., and David E. Bowen. 2000. Management Theory and Total Quality. In The Quality Movement & Organization Theory, ed. R.E. Cole and W.R. Scott, 3–21. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, John. 1931. Philosophy and Civilization. New York: G. P. Putnam’s Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, Paul, and Walter Powell. 1983. The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. American Sociological Review 48 (6): 147–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dörner, Dietrich. 1996. The Logic of Failure: Recognizing and Avoiding Error in Complex Situations. Cambridge, MA: Perseus Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Droitcour, Judith A., and Mary G. Kovar. 2008. Multiple Threats to the Validity of Randomized Studies. In Fundamental Issues on Evaluation, ed. N.L. Smith and P.R. Brandon. New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisner, Elliot W. 1976. Educational Connoisseurship and Criticism: Their Form and Functions in Educational Evaluation. Journal of Aesthetic Education 10 (3/4): 135–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2003. Educational Connoisseurship and Educational Criticism: An Arts-Based Approach to Educational Evaluation. In International Handbook of Educational Evaluation, ed. T. Kellaghan, D.L. Stufflebeam, and L.A. Wingate. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Espeland, Wendy N., and Michael Sauder. 2007. Rankings and Reactivity: How Public Measures Recreate Social Worlds. American Journal of Sociology 113 (1): 1–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, Frank. 2003. Reframing Public Policy: Discursive Politics and Deliberative Practices. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fountain, Jane E. 2001. Paradoxes of Public Sector Customer Service. Governance 14 (1): 55–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Funnell, Sue C., and Patricia J. Rogers. 2011. Purposeful Program Theory: Effective Use of Theories of Change and Logic Models. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furusten, Staffan. 2000. The Knowledge Base of Standards. In A World of Standards, ed. N. Brunsson and B. Jacobsson. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furubo, Jan-Eric, Ray C. Rist, and Rolf Sandahl. 2002. International Atlas of Evaluation. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith, Jay R. 1983. Strategy and Organization Planning. Human Resource Management 22 (1–2): 63–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gawande, Atul. 2014. Being Mortal, Medicine and What Matters in the End. New York: Metropolitan Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallström, Kristina T. 2000. Organizing the Process of Standardization. In A World of Standards, ed. N. Brunsson and B. Jacobsson. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, Lee, and Diana Green. 1993. Defining Quality. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 18 (1): 9–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, Lee, and Bjørn Stensaker. 2008. Quality Culture: Understandings, Boundaries and Linkages. European Journal of Education 43 (4): 427–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hermann, Stefan. 2007. Magt og Oplysning. Folkeskolen 1950–2006 [Power and Enlightenment. The Public School 1950–2006]. Copenhagen: Unge Pædagoger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Husz, Orsi. 2012. The Morality of Quality: Assimilating Material Mass Culture in Twentieth-Century Sweden. Journal of Modern European History 10 (2): 152–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Julnes, George, ed. 2012. Promoting Value in the Public Interest: Informing Policies for Judging Value in Evaluation. New Directions for Evaluation, No. 133. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreutzmann, Gladys. 1994. Börn og Unges Anbringelser uden for Hjemmet [Children and Young People’s Placements Outside the Home]. Nuuk: Direktoratet for Sociale Anliggender og Arbejdsmarked.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamont, Michèle. 2009. How Professors Think: Inside the Curious World of Academic Judgment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Latour, Bruno. 1987. Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society. Stony Stratford: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2004. Why Has Critique Run Out of Steam? From Matters of Fact to Matters of Concern. Critical Inquiry 30 (2): 225–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathison, Sandra. 1991. Role Conflicts for Internal Evaluators. Evaluation and Program Planning 14 (3): 173–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2011. Internal Evaluation, Historically Speaking. New Directions for Evaluation 132: 13–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, John W. 2008. Building Education for a World Society. In Changing Knowledge and Education, ed. M.A. Pereyra, 31–49. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, John W., and Brian Rowan. 1977. Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony. American Journal of Sociology 83: 340–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, John W., John Boli, and George M. Thomas. 1994. Ontology and Rationalization in the Western Cultural Account. In Institutional Environments and Organizations, ed. W.R. Scott and J.W. Meyer, 9–27. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noordegraf, Mirko. 2016. Reconfiguring Professional Work. Changing Forms of Professionalism in Public Services. Administration and Society 48 (7): 783–810.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, Niklas. 2016. Velfærdsstatens krise og neoliberalismens indtog i Danmark i 1970’erne [The Crisis of the Welfare State and the Arrival of Neoliberalism in Denmark in the 1970s]. Slagmark 74 (Fall): 119–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Øvretveit, John. 2005. Public Service Quality Improvement. In The Oxford Handbook of Public Management, ed. E. Ferlie, L.E. Lynn Jr., and C. Pollitt. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pawson, Ray, and Nick Tilley. 1997. Realistic Evaluation. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pflueger, Dane. 2016. Knowing Patients: The Customer Survey and the Changing Margins of Accounting in Healthcare. Accounting, Organizations and Society 53: 17–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, Michael. 1966. The Tacit Dimension. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Power, Michael. 1996. Making Things Auditable. Accounting, Organizations and Society 21 (2/3): 289–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1997. The Audit Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prewitt, Kenneth, Thomas A. Schwandt, and Miron L. Straf. 2012. Using Science as Evidence in Public Policy. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reeves, Carol A., and David A. Bednar. 1994. Defining Quality: Alternatives and Implications. Academy of Management Review 19 (3): 419–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, John. 2018. Managing Only with Transparency: The Strategic Functions of Ignorance. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 55: 53–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosanvallon, Pierre. 2009. Demokratin som Problem [Democracy as the Problem]. Hägersten: TankeKraft Förlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Røvik, Kjell A. 2005. Moderne Organisasjoner: Trender i Organisasjonstenkningen ved Tusenårsskiftet [Modern Organizations: Trends in Organizational Thinking at the Millennium]. Bergen: Fagbokforlaget.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahlins, Marshall. 1976. Culture and Practical Reason. Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwandt, Thomas A. 2002. Evaluation Practice Reconsidered. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwandt, Thomas A., and Holli Burgon. 2006. Evaluation and the Study of Lived Experience. In The SAGE Handbook of Evaluation, ed. I.F. Shaw, J.C. Greene, and M.M. Mark, 99–118. London: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sennett, Richard. 2008. The Craftsman. London: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sismondo, Sergio. 2008. Science and Technology Studies and an Engaged Program. In The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, ed. E.J. Hackett, O. Amsterdamska, M. Lynch, and J. Wajcman, 13–31. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sower, Victor E., and Frank K. Fair. 2005. There Is More to Quality than Continuous Improvement: Listening to Plato. QMJ 12 (1): 8–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sørensen, Eva M., and Søren K. Foged. 2015. Mål- og Resultatstyring i Kommunerne Efter Krisen [Target and Performance Management in the Municipalities After the Crisis]. Økonomi og Politik 88 (1): 46–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stake, Robert E. 2004. Standard-Based and Responsive Evaluation. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stark, David. 2009. The Sense of Dissonance, Accounts of Worth in Economic Life. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stern, Elliot, Nicoletta Stame, John Mayne, Kim Forss, Rick Davies, and Barbara Befani. 2012. Broadening the Range of Designs and Methods for Impact Evaluations: Report of a Study Commissioned by the Department for International Development, DFID Working Paper 38. London: Department for International Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stilgoe, Jack, Richard Owen, and Phil Macnaghten. 2013. Developing a Framework for Responsible Innovation. Research Policy 42: 1568–1580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strang, David, and John W. Meyer. 1994. Institutional Conditions for Diffusion. In Institutional Environments and Organizations, ed. W.R. Scott and J.W. Meyer, 100–112. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vattimo, Gianni. 2005. Nihilisme og Emancipation. Etik, Politik, Ret [Nihilsm and Emancipation. Ethics, Politics, and Law]. Aarhus: Aarhus University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vedung, Evert. 1997. Public Policy and Program Evaluation. New Brunswick: Transaction.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallenburg, Iris, Julia Quartz, and Roland Bal. 2016. Making Hospitals Governable: Performativity and Institutional Work in Ranking Practices. Administration & Society: 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, Karl E. 2000. Quality Improvement: A Sensemaking Perspective. In The Quality Movement and Organization Theory, ed. R.E. Cole and W.R. Scott, 155–172. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, Karl E., Kathleen M. Sutcliffe, and David Obstfeld. 2005. Organizing and the Process of Sense-making. Organization Science 16 (4): 409–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wimbush, Erica, Steve Montague, and Tamara Mulherin. 2012. Applications of Contribution Analysis to Outcome Planning and Impact Evaluation. Evaluation 18 (3): 310–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, Joni J. 2006. Making Up Users. Accounting, Organizations and Society 31 (6): 579–600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Dahler-Larsen .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Dahler-Larsen, P. (2019). Quality Perspectives. In: Quality. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10392-7_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10392-7_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-10391-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-10392-7

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics