Abstract
Why adapt? Moving on from the ‘empty quarter’ conclusion of the first chapter, the essential motivation or change which needs to be accepted is pinpointed before even embarking on a journey into such unexplored territory. Hobbs gives a brief outline of a research project undertaken as a mediative inquiry between supply/demand experts. It then moves into the first of five stages of the Adaptive Learning Pathway for Systemic Leadership, all stages of which go back to the basics of ‘what matters?’ There is a single resource of Jake Chapman’s ‘System Failure’ signposted for this initial stage which is necessary before change is likely to be embarked upon. The operational principle for thinking differently is collaborative learning: the chapter concludes with the associated key facet of systemic leadership for this principle.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Bibliography
Ackoff, R. L. (1960). Systems, Organizations and Interdisciplinary Research. General Systems, 5(1), 1–8.
Alvesson, M., & Sandberg, J. (2013). Has Management Studies Lost Its Way? Ideas for More Imaginative and Innovative Research. Journal of Management Studies, 50(1), 128–152.
Bammer, G. (2013). Disciplining Interdisciplinarity: Integration and Implementation Sciences for Researching Complex Real-World Problems. Canberra, Australia: Australian National University E Press.
Chapman, J. (2004). System Failure: Why Governments Must Learn to Think Differently (2nd ed.). London: Demos.
Creswell, J. W. (2013). What Is Mixed Methods Research? Retrieved November 2, 2015, from http://johnwcreswell.com/videos/.
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building Theories from Case Study Research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550.
Flood, R. L., & Jackson, M. C. (1991). Creative Problem Solving: Total Systems Intervention. Chichester: Wiley.
Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five Misunderstandings About Case-Study Research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 219–245.
Friend, J. K. (2004). Perspectives of Engagement in Community Operational Research. In G. Midgley & A. E. Ochoa-Arias (Eds.), Community Operational Research: OR and Systems Thinking for Community Development. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1994). The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. London, Thousand Oaks, CA, New Delhi and Singapore: Sage.
Hobbs, C. (2016). Tapping the Resource Within? Exploring a Learning Pathway for Systemic Leadership Within Local Governance Networks. Unpublished doctoral dissertation (Ph.D. Systems Science). University of Hull, Hull, UK.
Klag, M., & Langley, A. (2013). Approaching the Conceptual Leap in Qualitative Research. International Journal of Management Reviews, 15(2), 149–166.
Pettigrew, A. M. (2001). Management Research After Modernism. British Journal of Management, 12(S1), S61–S70.
Simons, H. (1996). The Paradox of Case Study. Cambridge Journal of Education, 26(2), 225–240.
Stake, R. E. (1995). The Art of Case Study Research. Thousand Oaks, London and New Delhi: Sage.
Strijbos, S. (1995). How Can Systems Thinking Help Us in Bridging the Gap Between Science and Wisdom? Systems Practice, 8(4), 361–376.
van de Ven, A. H. (2007). Engaged Scholarship: A Guide for Organizational Research. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hobbs, C. (2019). Thinking Differently Matters. In: Systemic Leadership for Local Governance. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-08280-2_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-08280-2_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-08279-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-08280-2
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)