Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Tool Support for Designing Innovative Sustainable Business Models

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Art of Structuring

Abstract

Successful innovation is the key to generate novel business model ideas. Current real-world challenges such as the deterioration of the natural environment require practitioners and academics alike to identify new ways of acting and behaving. Living the ‘virtues of German engineering’ in information systems research, we aim at supporting business model innovation and solving imminent challenges by developing purposeful IT artifacts. In this article, we report on three ongoing research projects and emerging software prototypes that assist business model innovation. First, to foster creativity during the development of new business model ideas and to increase rigorousness in Design Thinking, we implemented a prototype that enables a structured, traceable, and collaborative documentation of Design Thinking projects and recommends task-specific creativity techniques. Second, to support the construction and the analysis of business models, we present the GBM Editor that especially focuses on the reflection of sustainability. Third, to detail the business model, we illustrate the Cooperation Manager that allow planning service networks by focusing on inter-organizational tasks and information exchanges. For demonstrating the applicability and the dependencies of these tools, we draw on an illustrative scenario of electric vehicle battery second use.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Balcombe, P., Rigby, D., & Azapagic, A. (2014). Investigating the importance of motivations and barriers related to microgeneration uptake in the UK. Applied Energy, 130(18), 403–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, J. (2008). Ein Plädoyer für die gestaltungsorientierte Wirtschaftsinformatik. In R. Jung, & T. Myrach (Eds.), Quo vadis Wirtschaftsinformatik? (pp. 3–21). Wiesbaden: Gabler. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-9855-2_1.

  • Bräuer, S. (2018). Electric vehicle battery second use-future trade, business models, and information systems design. University of Münster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bräuer, S., Monhof, M., Klör, B., Plenter, F., Siemen, C., & Beverungen, D. (2016). Residential energy storage from repurposed electric vehicle batteries-market overview and development of a service-centered business model. In 2016 IEEE 18th Conference on Business Informatics. Paris (FR).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bräuer, S., Scholta, H., Strotmeier, M., & Knackstedt, R. (2017). Entwicklung und Anwendung der Cooperation Experience-Modellierungsmethode. In J. Becker, T. Bernhold, R. Knackstedt, & M. Matzner (Eds.), Planung koordinierter Wertschöpfungspartnerschaften (pp. 109–157). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenner, W., Uebernickel, F., & Abrell, T. (2016). Design thinking as mindset, process, and toolbox. In W. Uebernickel & F. Brenner (Eds.), Design thinking for innovation (pp. 3–21). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T. (2008). Design thinking. Harvard Business Review, 86(4), 84–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T. (2009). Change by design: How design thinking transforms organizations and inspires innovation. New York City, NY: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T., & Katz, B. (2011). Change by design. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28(3), 381–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brzeski, C., & Burk, I. (2017). Sechs Millionen Elektroautos im Jahr 2030–Illusion oder Realität?. Frankfurt am Main: ING DiBa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, R. (1992). Wicked problems in design thinking. Design Issues, 8(2), 5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casals, L. C., García, B. A., Aguesse, F., & Iturrondobeitia, A. (2017). Second life of electric vehicle batteries: Relation between materials degradation and environmental impact. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 22(1), 82–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • d.School. (2018). An introduction to design thinking-process guide.

    Google Scholar 

  • Design Council. (2018). The design process: What is the double diamond? Retrieved September 19, 2018, from https://www.designcouncil.org.uk/news-opinion/design-process-what-double-diam-ond.

  • Deutsches Institut für Normung e.V. (2009). PAS 1094:2009-12 - Hybride Wertschöpfung - Integration von Sach- und Dienstleistung. Berlin: Beuth Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsches Institut für Normung e.V. (2011). DIN EN 50272-1:2011-10; VDE 0510-1:2011-10. Berlin: Beuth Verlag GmbH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunne, D., & Martin, R. (2006). Design thinking and how it will change management education: An interview and discussion. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 5(4), 512–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durugbo, C., Tiwari, A., & Alcock, J. R. (2011). A review of information flow diagrammatic models for product-service systems. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 52(9–12), 1193–1208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engberts, F., & Borgman, H. (2018). Application of design thinking for service innovation: Current practices, expectations and adoption barriers. In Proceedings of the 51st Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Big Island (HI).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fehér, P., & Varga, K. (2017). Using design thinking to identify banking digitization opportunities–snapshot of the hungarian banking system. In 30th Bled eConference Digital Transformation–From Connecting Things to Transforming Our Lives. Bled, SI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Figgener, J., Haberschusz, D., Kairies, K.-P., Wessels, O., Tepe, B., & Sauer, D. U. (2018). Wissenschaftliches Mess- und Evaluierungsprogramm Solarstormspeicher 2.0: Jahresbericht 2018. Aachen: Institut für Stromrichtertechnik und Elektrische Antriebe der RWTH Aachen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasso-Plattner-Institut. (2018). Die sechs Schritte im Design Thinking Innovationsprozess. Retrieved September 19, 2018, from https://hpi.de/school-of-design-thinking/design-thinking/hintergrund/design-thinking-prozess.html.

  • Hofer, J., Schoormann, T., Kortum, J., & Knackstedt, R. (2019). ,,Ich weiß was ihr letzte Sitzung getan habt” – Entwicklung und Anwendung eines Softwarewerkzeuges zur Dokumentation von Design Thinking-Projekten. HMD Praxis der Wirtschaftsinformatik (forthcoming).

    Google Scholar 

  • John, T. (2016). Supporting business model idea generation through machine-generated ideas: A design theory. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS). Dublin (IE).

    Google Scholar 

  • Junglas, I., Niehaves, B., Spiekermann, S., Stahl, B. C., Weitzel, T., Winter, R., et al. (2011). The inflation of academic intellectual capital: The case for design dcience research in Europe. European Journal of Information Systems, 20(1), 1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lattemann, C., Siemon, D., Dorawa, D., & Redlich, B. (2017). Digitization of the design thinking process solving problems with geographically dispersed teams. In Design, user experience, and usability: theory, methodology, and management (pp. 71–88). Vancouver, CA: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lüdeke-Freund, F., Freudenreich, B., Schaltegger, S., Saviuc, I., & Stock, M. (2017). Sustainability-oriented business model assessment—A conceptual foundation. In E. G. Carayannis & S. Sindakis (Eds.), Analytics, innovation, and excellence-driven enterprise sustainability (pp. 169–206). New York: Palgrave Macmillan US.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Malone, T. W., & Crowston, K. (1994). The interdisciplinary study of coordination. ACM Computing Surveys, 26(1), 87–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massa, L., Tucci, C. L., & Afuah, A. (2017). A critical assessment of business model research. Academy of Management Annals, 11(1), 73–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menning, A., Beyhl, T., Giese, H., Weinberg, U., & Nicolai, C. (2014). Introducing the LogCal: Template-based documentation support for educational design thinking projects. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education (E&PDE14), Design Education and Human Technology Relations. Twente (NL).

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller-Wienbergen, F., Müller, O., Seidel, S., & Becker, J. (2011). Leaving the beaten tracks in creative work–A design theory for systems that support convergent and divergent thinking. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 12(11), 714–740.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Österle, H., Becker, J., Frank, U., Hess, T., Karagiannis, D., Krcmar, H., … Sinz, E. J. (2011). Memorandum on design-oriented information systems research. European Journal of Information Systems, 20(1), 7–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osterwalder, A., & Pigneur, Y. (2010). Business model generation: A handbook for visionaries, game changers, and challengers. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osterwalder, A., Pigneur, Y., & Tucci, C. L. (2005). Clarifying business models: Origins, present, and future of the concept. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 16(1), 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, A. L., Parasuraman, A., Bowen, D. E., Patricio, L., & Voss, C. A. (2015). Service research priorities in a rapidly changing context. Journal of Service Research, 18(2), 127–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plenter, F., Menne, S., Hindersmann, C., Bräuer, S., Voscort, J., & Mittmann, R. (2019). Szenarien und Geschäftsmodelle für die Vermarktung umgewidmeter Traktionsbatterien. In J. Becker, D. Beverungen, M. Winter, & S. Menne (Eds.), Umwidmung und Weiterverwendung von Traktionsbatterien: Szenarien, Dienstleistungen und Entscheidungsunterstützung. Springer Vieweg: Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rittel, H. W. J., & Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4(2), 155–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoormann, T., Behrens, D., Kolek, E., & Knackstedt, R. (2016). Sustainability in business models–A literature-review-based design-science-oriented research agenda. In Proceedings of the 24th European Conference in Information Systems (ECIS). Istanbul (TR).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoormann, T., Behrens, D., & Knackstedt, R. (2018a). Design principles for leveraging sustainability in business modelling tools. In Proceedings of the 25th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS). Portsmout (UK).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoormann, T., Behrens, D., & Knackstedt, R. (2018b). The noblest way to learn wisdom is by reflection: Designing software tools for reflecting sustainability in business models. In Proceedings of the 39th International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS). San Francisco (USA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Seidel, S., Müller-Wienbergen, F., & Becker, J. (2010). The concept of creativity in the information systems discipline: Past, present, and prospects. CAIS, 27(2), 14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seidel, S., Recker, J. C., & vom Brocke, J. (2013). Sensemaking and sustainable practicing: functional affordances of information systems in green transformations. MIS Quarterly, 37(4), 1275–1299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shneiderman, B. (2007). Creativity support tools: Accelerating discovery and innovation. Communications of the ACM, 50(12), 20–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spotnitz, R. (2003). Simulation of capacity fade in lithium-ion batteries. Journal of Power Sources, 113(1), 72–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strategyzer AG. (2018). Strategyzer web-app. Retrieved from https://strategyzer.com/app.

  • Strotmeier, M., Jähne, P., Riffel, M., & Winter, A. (2017). Integriertes Softwarewerkzeug für die Cooperation Experience-Modellierungssprache. In J. Becker, T. Bernhold, R. Knackstedt, & M. Matzner (Eds.), Planung koordinierter Wertschöpfungspartnerschaften. Berlin: Springer Gabler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szopinski, D., Schoormann, T., John, T., Knackstedt, R., & Kundisch, D. (2017). How software can support innovating business models: A taxonomy of functions of business model development tools. In Proceedings of the American Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS). Boston, MA (USA).

    Google Scholar 

  • UNECE. (2016). ADR 2017-European agreement concerning the international carriage of dangerous goods by road-Volume I.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voigt, M., Bergener, K., & Becker, J. (2013). Comprehensive support for creativity-intensive processes. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 5(4), 227–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Commission on Environment and Development. (1987). Our common future: Report of the world commission on environment and development. NY (USA): New York City.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zott, C., Amit, R., & Massa, L. (2011). The business model: Recent developments and future research. Journal of Management, 37(4), 1019–1042.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Hildesheim, Hildesheim, Germany

    Ralf Knackstedt, Sebastian Bräuer & Thorsten Schoormann

Authors
  1. Ralf Knackstedt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sebastian Bräuer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Thorsten Schoormann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ralf Knackstedt .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Information Systems, University of Münster, Münster, Germany

    Katrin Bergener

  2. Department of Information Systems, University of Münster, Münster, Germany

    Michael Räckers

  3. Department of Information Systems, University of Münster, Münster, Germany

    Armin Stein

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Knackstedt, R., Bräuer, S., Schoormann, T. (2019). Tool Support for Designing Innovative Sustainable Business Models. In: Bergener, K., Räckers, M., Stein, A. (eds) The Art of Structuring. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-06234-7_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation