Abstract
Modern enterprises are under permanent pressure for change to cope with new competitors and integrate emerging technologies. These changes involve adaptation of processes, operations, architectures, value propositions, and the response to evolving market requirements—especially regarding the digitalization. Modelling methods are an established approach for the conceptual representation, design, analysis, and implementation of complex systems and have gained much attention in both, academia and industry. At the core of a modelling method is the metamodel as a formalized specification of the syntactic nature of the domain under consideration. The paper at hand amplifies the notion of metamodels toward “metamodels as a conceptual structure” and introduces semantic and syntactic operations applied to this structure. Based on recent advances in the field, this paper shows, how metamodels as a conceptual structure facilitate managing complexity in fast changing environments.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
ADOxx.org. (2018). ADOxx metamodeling platform.
Awadid, A., Bork, D., Karagiannis, D., & Nurcan, S. (2018). Toward generic consistency paterns in multi-view enterprise modelling. In European Conference on Information Systems. Portsmouth, UK.
Becker, J., Beverungen, D., Breuker, D., Hanns-Alexander, D., & Rauer, H. P. (2013a). Performance benchmarking for designing interaction routines-managing trade-offs in service co-creation with the data envelopment analysis. In ECIS 2013 Proceedings (p. 185).
Becker, J., Beverungen, D., Knackstedt, R., Matzner, M., Müller, O., & Pöppelbuß, J. (2013b). Designing interaction routines in service networks: A modularity and social construction-based approach. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 25(1), 37–68.
Becker, J., vom Brocke, J., Heddier, M., & Seidel, S. (2015). In search of information systems (grand) challenges. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 57(6), 337–390.
Becker, J., Delfmann, P., Eggert, M., & Schwittay, S. (2012). Generalizability and applicability of model-based business process compliance-checking approaches—A state-of-the-art analysis and research roadmap. Business Research, 5(2), 221–247.
Bork, D. (2018). Metamodel-based analysis of domain-specific conceptual modeling methods. In 11th IFIP WG 8.1 Working Conference on the Practice of Enterprise Modelling (pp. 172-187). Springer.
Bork, D., Buchmann, R., & Karagiannis, D. (2015). Preserving multi-view consistency in diagrammatic knowledge representation. In International Conference on Knowledge Science, Engineering and Management (pp. 177–182). Springer.
Bork, D., & Fill, H. G. (2014). Formal aspects of enterprise modeling methods: A comparison framework. In Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 3400–3409).
Bork, D., Karagiannis, D., & Pittl, B. (2018). How are metamodels specified in practice? Empirical insights and recommendations. In 24th Americas Conference on Information Systems (pp. 1–11). New Orleans, USA.
Del Fabro, M. D., & Valduriez, P. (2007). Semi-automatic model integration using matching transformations and weaving models. In Proceedings of the 2007 ACM symposium on Applied computing (pp. 963–970).
Efendioglu, N., Woitsch, R., & Utz, W. (2016). A toolbox supporting agile modelling method engineering: ADOxx. org modelling method conceptualization environment. In IFIP Working Conference on The Practice of Enterprise Modeling (pp. 317–325). Cham: Springer.
Ferstl, O. K., & Sinz, E. J. (2013). Grundlagen der Wirtschaftsinformatik. Walter der Gruyter.
Ferstl, O. K., Sinz, E. J., & Bork, D. (2016). Tool support for the semantic object model. Domain-specific conceptual modeling (pp. 291–310). Cham: Springer.
Fill, H. G. (2011). On the conceptualization of a modeling language for semantic model annotations. In International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering Workshops (pp. 134–148). Berlin: Springer.
Götzinger, D., Miron, E.-T., & Staffel, F. (2016). OMiLAB: An open collaborative environment for modeling method engineering. In Domain-Specific Conceptual Modeling (pp. 55–76). Springer.
Höfferer, P. (2007). Achieving business process model interoperability using metamodels and ontologies. In European Conference on Information Systems (pp. 1620–1631).
Hrgovcic, V., Karagiannis, D., & Woitsch, R. (2013). Conceptual modeling of the organisational aspects for distributed applications: The semantic lifting approach. In IEEE 37th Annual of Computer Software and Applications Conference Workshops (pp. 145–150).
Jackendoff, R. (1987). The status of thematic relations in linguistic theory. Linguistic Inquiry, 18(3), 369–411. https://doi.org/10.2307/4178548.
Karagiannis, D., & Buchmann, R. A. (2016). Linked open models: Extending linked open data with conceptual model information. Information Systems, 56, 174–197.
Karagiannis, D., Buchmann, R. A., & Walch, M. (2017). How can diagrammatic conceptual modelling support knowledge management? In European Conference on Information Systems (pp. 1568–1583).
Karagiannis, D., Buchmann, R., & Bork, D. (2016). Managing consistency in multi-view enterprise models: An approach based on semantic queries. In 24th European Conference on Information Systems.
Karagiannis, D., & Fill, H. G. (2013). On the conceptualisation of modelling methods using the ADOxx meta modelling platform. Enterprise Modelling and Information Systems Architectures, 8(1), 4–25.
Karagiannis, D., & Kühn, H. (2002). Metamodelling platforms. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference EC-Web, 2455 (p. 182).
Karagiannis, D., Mayr, H. C., & Mylopoulus, J. (2016). Domain-specific conceptual modeling. Springer International Publishing.
Mylopoulus, J. (1992). Conceptual modelling and telos. Conceptual modelling, databases, and CASE: An integrated view of information system development. Wiley.
Prackwieser, C., Buchmann, R., Grossmann, W., & Karagiannis, D. (2013). Towards a generic hybrid simulation algorithm based on a semantic mapping and rule evaluation approach. In International Conference on Knowledge Science, Engineering and Management (pp. 147–160). Springer.
Woitsch, R. (2013). Hybrid modelling with ADOxx: Virtual enterprise interoperability using meta models. In International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering Workshops (pp. 298–303). Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38490-5_28.
Zivkovic, S., Kuhn, H., & Karagiannis, D. (2007). Facilitate modelling using method integration: An approach using mappings and integration rules. In European Conference on Information Systems (pp. 2038–2049).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Karagiannis, D., Bork, D., Utz, W. (2019). Metamodels as a Conceptual Structure: Some Semantical and Syntactical Operations. In: Bergener, K., Räckers, M., Stein, A. (eds) The Art of Structuring. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-06234-7_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-06234-7_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-06233-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-06234-7
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)