Skip to main content

Verification of the Calculation of Stationary Subsonic Flows and Presentation of Results

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Smart Modeling for Engineering Systems (GCM50 2018)

Abstract

In some regions located far from the streamlined body’s boundary, the flow can be vortex and non-barotropic but the Euler equations model the flow of a viscous gas to high precision. It was assumed that in such regions the consequences of the Euler equations must also be satisfied to high precision. One of these consequences is maximum principle for pressure for subsonic stationary three-dimensional vortex flows of an ideal gas. This maximum principle for pressure includes the Q parameter, the image of the level surfaces of which is currently widely used to visualize the flow pattern. The maximum principle reveals the meaning of the surface Q = 0. It separates the flow regions Q > 0, in which there can be no local pressure maximum points, from the regions Q < 0, where there can be no local pressure minimum points. A similar meaning of the Q parameter was known earlier only for an incompressible fluid. The expression for the Q parameter contains only the first derivatives of the velocity components, which allows determining the sign of the Q parameter even for numerical solutions obtained by low-order approximation methods. The chapter gives examples of the use of this principle for verification of Computational Fluid Dynamic (CFD) simulation results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Vyshinsky, V.V.: Development of exact solutions of the shock-free flow around a symmetric profile with a local supersonic zone. Scientific notes of TsAGI VI (3), 1–8 (1075). (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Vyshinsky, V.V., Sizykh, G.B.: On verification of calculations of stationary subsonic flows and representation of results. Matematicheskoe Modelirovanie 30(6), 21–38 (2018). (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Rowland, H.: On the motion of a perfect incompressible fluid when no bodies are present. Am. J. Math. 3, 226–268 (1880)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Lamb, H.: Hydrodynamics. Cambridge University Press (1895)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hamel, G.: Ein allgemeiner Satz uber den Druck bei der Bewegung volumbestandiger Flussigkeiten. Monatshefte Math. Phys. 43, 345–363 (1936)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Serrin, J.: Mathematical principles of classical fluid mechanics. Springer, Berlin (1959)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. Truesdell, C.: Two measures of vorticity. J. Rational Mech. Anal. 2, 173–217 (1953)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Shiffman, M.: On the existence of subsonic flows of a compressible fluid. J. Rational Mech. Anal. 1, 605–652 (1952)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Bers L.: Mathematical aspects of subsonic and transonic gas dynamics. Wiley, New York (1958)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Vyshinskiy V.V., Ivanov V.K., Terpugov A.V.: Simulation of complex flight regimes on aerobatic stands with considering atmospheric turbulence. Trudy MFTI 7(1), 36–42 (2015). (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Jeong, J., Hussain, F.: On the identification of a vortex. J. Fluid Mech. 285, 69–94 (1995)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Dubief, Y., Delcayre, F.: On coherent-vortex identification in turbulence. J. Turbulence 1(1), 1–22 (2000)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Lesieur, M., Begou, P., Briand, E., Danet, A., Delcayre, F., Aider, J.L.: Coherent-vortex dynamics in large-eddy simulations of turbulence. J. Turbul. 4(1), 1–16 (2003)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Cala, C.E., Fernandes, E.C., Heitor, M.V., Shtork, S.I.: Coherent structures in unsteady swirling jet flow. Exp. Fluids 40(2), 267–276 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Victor V. Vyshinsky .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Vyshinsky, V.V., Sizykh, G.B. (2019). Verification of the Calculation of Stationary Subsonic Flows and Presentation of Results. In: Petrov, I., Favorskaya, A., Favorskaya, M., Simakov, S., Jain, L. (eds) Smart Modeling for Engineering Systems. GCM50 2018. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol 133. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-06228-6_19

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics