Abstract
The chapter begins by exploring some of the shortcomings of Levinasian ethics by highlighting its suspicion of aesthetics, the emphasis it places on pre-ontological ethics, the required proximity of the “face” of the Other and the limitations attached to the obliteration of the Self. As the chapter discusses these shortcomings, it progressively introduces Greig’s theatre engagement with ethics. Subsequently, Rodríguez offers a discussion of ethics and aesthetics by reference to Nicolas Bourriaud’s notion of relational aesthetics as well as Clare Bishop’s critique of the term, alongside her suspicion of the ethical turn, shared with philosophers Jacques Rancière and Slavoj Žižek. Aesthethics, a term Rodríguez borrows from Philippe Lacoue-Labarthe, is then used to describe Greig’s theatre’s interrelation with “reality” and what Rodríguez calls the wounded aesthetic strategies of Greig’s theatre. The potential impact of those strategies is what Rodríguez terms the politics of aesthethics of Greig’s holed theatre.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rodríguez, V. (2019). From Ethics to the Politics of Aesthethics. In: David Greig’s Holed Theatre. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-06182-1_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-06182-1_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-06181-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-06182-1
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)