Skip to main content

High-Frequency Ultrasound Analysis in Both Experimental and Computation Level to Understand the Microstructural Change in Soft Tissues

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: The Minerals, Metals & Materials Series ((MMMS))

Abstract

High-frequency ultrasound has become a popular tool in characterizing small-scale soft materials. This method is particularly effective in pitch-catch mode. It has been used in tissue phantoms to evaluate the microstructure. This method has the potential to be used in determining the tissue pathology in cancer and other tissue degenerative diseases. Among different types of parameters of ultrasound, peak density has been found to be most sensitive to the microstructural and scatterer variations in soft materials. 25 MHz ultrasound wave is used in a pitch-catch mode to evaluate mm scale tissue phantoms with microscale scatterers on different thickness levels. FFT is used to convert the receiving signal to frequency domain, calibrate to remove the noise and analyze the peak density. Finite element simulation is used to model the wave propagation in the medium containing scatterers to find a systematic correlation with the scatterer density.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Shull PJ (2002) Nondestructive evaluation: theory, techniques, and applications, New York, CRC Press, ISBN 9780824788728

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Krautkrämer J, Krautkrämer H (1990) Ultrasonic testing of materials. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. U.S. Breast Cancer Statistics | Breastcancer.org (2018) https://www.breastcancer.org/symptoms/understand_bc/statistics. Accessed 11 Sep 2018

  4. Litière S et al (2012) Breast conserving therapy versus mastectomy for stage I–II breast cancer: 20 year follow-up of the EORTC 10801 phase 3 randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 13(4):412–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Pleijhuis RG, Graafland M, De Vries J, Bart J, De Jong JS, Van Dam GM (2009) Obtaining adequate surgical margins in breast-conserving therapy for patients with early-stage breast cancer: current modalities and future directions. Ann Surg Oncol 16(10):2717–2730

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Jacobs L (2008) Positive margins: the challenge continues for breast surgeons. Ann Surg Oncol 15(5):1271–1272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Singletary SE (2002) Surgical margins in patients with early-stage breast cancer treated with breast conservation therapy. Am J Surg 184(5):383–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Russo AL et al (2013) Margin status and the risk of local recurrence in patients with early-stage breast cancer treated with breast-conserving therapy. Breast Cancer Res Treat 140(2):353–361

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Thill M, Baumann K, Barinoff J (2014) Intraoperative assessment of margins in breast conservative surgery—still in use? J Surg Oncol 110(1):15–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Faverly DRG, Hendriks JHCL, Holland R (2001) Breast carcinomas of limited extent: frequency, radiologic-pathologic characteristics, and surgical margin requirements. Cancer 91(4):647–659

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Mamou J, Oelze ML, O’Brien WD, Zachary JF (2005) Identifying ultrasonic scattering sites from three-dimensional impedance maps. J Acoust Soc Am 117(1):413–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Wilke LG et al (2009) Rapid noninvasive optical imaging of tissue composition in breast tumor margins. Am J Surg 198(4):566–574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Doyle TE et al (2013) Determining breast pathology in surgical margins with high-frequency ultrasound: phantom and numerical simulations. J Acoust Soc Am 133(5):3541

    Google Scholar 

  14. Doyle TE et al (2011) High-frequency ultrasound for intraoperative margin assessments in breast conservation surgery: a feasibility study. BMC Cancer 11(1):444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Carter C, Neumayer LA, Factor RE, Doyle TE (2018) Abstract P6-03-10: using high-frequency ultrasound (20–80 MHz) to differentiate malignant vs benign breast tissue in surgical margins. Cancer Res 78(4 Suppl), P6-03-10 LP-P6-03-10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bude RO, Adler RS (1995) An easily made, low-cost, tissue-like ultrasound phantom material. J Clin Ultrasound 23(May):271–273

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Stromer J, Ladani L (2016) Investigating ultrasound imaging in the frequency domain for tissue characterisation. Nondestruct Test Eval 31(3):209–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leila Ladani .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Ladani, L., Paul, K., Stromer, J. (2019). High-Frequency Ultrasound Analysis in Both Experimental and Computation Level to Understand the Microstructural Change in Soft Tissues. In: Nakano, J., et al. Advanced Real Time Imaging II. The Minerals, Metals & Materials Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-06143-2_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics