Skip to main content

Pedagogical Perspectives on the Use of Technology within Medical Curricula: Moving Away from Norm Driven Implementation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology ((AEMB,volume 1120))

Abstract

There is often an expectation that any educational institution worth its salt will be at the forefront of technological advances. An often unchallenged and somewhat romanticised viewpoint persists that, in all cases, technology is best. What is not always openly discussed is the evidence base and pedagogy behind the use of technology, visualisation and traditional approaches of teaching within the fields of medical and anatomy education curricula. There are many advantages to using technology within the learning environment but, often, it is possible to achieve the same outcomes through the use of many other non-technological instructional modalities. The frequent shortcoming when institutions use technology is that there is a lack of integration across the curriculum, a failure to map to the blueprint, little attempt to include technology in the feedback cycle and assessment, and insufficient time and resource allocation for educators developing resources. Without careful implementation and integration, it can appear that institutions are throwing the latest developments at students without due care and consideration to the evidence-base and without the necessary institutional support for staff and resource development. This is not the fault of educators; the competing demands on staff time and institutional drive to climb the ranking tables means that technology is often perceived as the quick fix.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • AbouHashem Y, Dayal M, Savanah S, Štrkalj G (2015) The application of 3D printing in anatomy education. Med Educ Online 20:1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aka JJ, Cookson NE, Hafferty FW, Finn GM (2018) Teaching by stealth: utilising the hidden curriculum through body painting within anatomy education. Eur J Anat 22(2):173–182

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson RC, Jackson GB (1992) Research and education reform. National Academy Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Beaudoin M (1990) The instructor’s changing role in distance education. Am J Dist Educ 4(2):21–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Beetham H, White D (2013) Students’ expectations and experiences of the digital environment. http://jiscdesignstudio.pbworks.com/w/file/fetch/70265022/Executive%20summary%20FINAL.pdf. Accessed 3 Oct 2018

  • Briggs S (2005) Changing roles and competencies of academics. Active Learn Higher Educ 6(3):256–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckingham J (2005) The problem with educational research. The Australian 18:18

    Google Scholar 

  • Clunie L, Morris NP, Jones VCT, Pickering JD (2017) How comprehensive are research studies investigating the efficacy of technology-enhanced learning resources in anatomy education? A systematic review. Anat Sci Educ 11(3):303–319

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Collins A, Halverson R (2010) The second educational revolution: rethinking education in the age of technology. J Comput Assist Learn 26(1):18–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook DA (2009) The failure of e-learning research to inform educational practice, and what we can do about it. Med Teach 31:2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cookson NE, Aka JJ, Finn GM (2018) An exploration of anatomists’ views toward the use of body painting in anatomical and medical education: an international study. Anat Sci Educ 11(2):146–154

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Delgaty L (2014) Twelve tips for academic role and institutional change in distance learning. Med Teach 37(1):41–46

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Delgaty L, Matthan J, Rawles L, Guilding C, Woolner P, Thomas U (2016) Digital capabilities and expectations of prospective students: preparing higher education for learning and teaching of the future. In: BERA conference, 2016, Leeds, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Delgaty L, Fisher J, Thompson R (2017) The ‘dark side’ of technology in medical education. AMEE MedEdPublish. https://doi.org/10.15694/mep.2017.000081. Accessed 2 Oct 2018

  • Dijck J (2013) The culture of connectivity. Oxford University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dori YJ, Belcher J (2005) How does technology-enabled active learning affect undergraduate students’ understanding of electromagnetism concepts? J Learn Sci 14(2):243–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finn GM (2015) Using body painting and other art-based approaches to teach anatomy. In: Teaching anatomy. Springer, Cham, pp 155–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Finn GM, McLachlan JC (2010) A qualitative study of student responses to body painting. Anat Sci Educ 3(1):33–38

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Finn GM, Patten D, McLachlan JC (2010) The impact of wearing scrubs on contextual learning. Med Teach 32(5):381–384

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Finn GM, Sawdon M, Griksaitis M (2012) The additive effect of teaching undergraduate cardiac anatomy using cadavers and ultrasound echocardiography. Eur J Anat 16(3):199–205

    Google Scholar 

  • Fried CB (2008) In-class laptop use and its effects on student learning. Comput Educ 50:906–914

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giles J (2005) Internet encyclopaedias go head to head. Nature 438:900–901

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon JA et al (2001) “Practicing” medicine without risk: students’ and educators’ responses to high-fidelity patient simulation. Acad Med 76(5):469–472

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Griksaitis MJ, Sawdon MA, Finn GM (2012) Ultrasound and cadaveric prosections as methods for teaching cardiac anatomy: a comparative study. Anat Sci Educ 5(1):20–26

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Griksaitis MJ, Scott MP, Finn GM (2014) Twelve tips for teaching with ultrasound in the undergraduate curriculum. Med Teach 36(1):19–24

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Guckian J, Spencer J (2018) #SixSecondStudying: the rise and fall of vine in MedEd. Clin Teach 15:1–3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herring MY (2001) 10 reasons why the internet is no substitute for a library. Dacus Library Faculty publications paper 22. http://digitalcommons.winthrop.edu/dacus_facpub/22 Accessed 30 Sept 2018

  • Hovenga EJS, Bricknell L (2006) Changing academic roles: new approaches to teaching and distance learning in Australia. Methods Inf Med 45(3):288–293

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • JISC Website (2018.) Available at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/. Accessed 1 Oct 2018

  • Judson E (2006) How teachers integrate technology and their beliefs about learning: is there a connection? J Technol Teach Educ 14(3):581–597

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee K (2017) Rethinking the accessibility of online higher education: a historical review. Internet High Educ 33:15–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lévy P (1997) Education and training: new technologies and collective intelligence. Prospects 27(2):248–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maran NJ, Glavin RJ (2003) Low-to high-fidelity simulation – a continuum of medical education? Med Educ 37:22–28

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McMenamin PG, Quayle MR, McHenry CR, Adams JW (2014) The production of anatomical teaching resources using three-dimensional (3D) printing technology. Anat Sci Educ 7:479–486

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mueller PA, Oppenheimer DM (2014) Corrigendum: the pen is mightier than the keyboard: advantages of longhand over laptop note taking. Psychol Sci 25:1159–1168

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (2000) How people learn: brain, mind, experience, and school, Expanded edn. National Academy Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman G (2002) Research in medical education: three decades of progress. Br Med J 324:1560–1562

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peck KL, Dorricott D (1994) Why use technology? Educ Leadersh 51:11–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips AW, Matthan J, Bookless LR, Whitehead IJ, Madhavan A, Rodham P, Porter ALR, Nesbitt CI, Stansby G (2017) Individualised expert feedback is not essential for improving basic clinical skills performance in novice learners: a randomized trial. J Surg Educ 74(4):612–620

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pinch TJ (1992) Opening black boxes: science, technology and society. Soc Stud Sci 22(3):487–510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ragan ED, Jennings SR, Massey JD, Doolittle PE (2014) Unregulated use of laptops over time in large lecture classes. Comput Educ 78:78–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rammell J, Matthan J, Gray M, Bookless LR, Nesbitt CI, Rodham P, Moss J, Stansby G, Phillips AW (2018) Asynchronous unsupervised video-enhanced feedback as effective as direct expert feedback in the long-term retention of practical clinical skills: randomised trial comparing two feedback methods in a cohort of novice medical students. J Surg Educ. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1931720417307249. Accessed 2 Oct 2018

  • Ravizza SM, Hambrick DZ, Fenn KM (2014) Non-academic internet use in the classroom is negatively related to classroom learning regardless of intellectual ability. Comput Educ 78:109–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reis S, Guimarães P, Coelho F, Nogueira E, Coelho L (2018) A framework for simulation systems and technologies for medical training. In: Global medical engineering physics exchanges/Pan American Health Care Exchanges (GMEPE/PAHCE) 2018

    Google Scholar 

  • Resta P, Laferrière T (2007) Technology in support of collaborative learning. Educ Psychol Rev 19(1):65–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts D, Newman LR, Schwarzstein R (2012) Twelve tips for facilitating millennials’ learning. Med Teach 34(4):274–278

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sampson PJ (2010) Deliberate engagement of laptops in large lecture classes to improve attentiveness and engagement. ASEE Comput Educ 2:27–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparrow B, Liu J, Wegner DM (2011) Google effects on memory: cognitive consequences of having information at our fingertips. Science 333(6043):776–778

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wikipedia Contributors (2018) Wiki. Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Accessed 2 Oct 2018

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson AM, Likens GE (2015) Content volatility of scientific topics in Wikipedia: a cautionary tale. PLoS One 10(8):e0134454

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Wong G, Greenhalgh T, Pawton R (2010) Internet based medical education: a realist review of what works, for whom and in what circumstances. BMC Med Educ 10:12

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gabrielle M. Finn .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Finn, G.M., Matthan, J. (2019). Pedagogical Perspectives on the Use of Technology within Medical Curricula: Moving Away from Norm Driven Implementation. In: Rea, P. (eds) Biomedical Visualisation . Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol 1120. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-06070-1_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics