Skip to main content

Perioperative Hemodynamic Monitoring: MERCI to Predict Economic Impact

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Annual Update in Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine 2019

Part of the book series: Annual Update in Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine ((AUICEM))

Abstract

Most hemodynamic monitoring techniques have an associated cost. Although difficult to quantify, the cost of their implementation may be significant, particularly for techniques requiring prolonged high-level training, such as echocardiography. These costs, or upfront investments, may be an obstacle to hospital adoption. Importantly, a fair evaluation of the return on investment must take into account the potential savings associated with a reduction in postoperative complications and hospital length of stay.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Dimick JB, Weeks WB, Karia RJ. Who pays for poor surgical quality? Building a business case for quality improvement. J Am Coll Surg. 2006;202:933–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Vonlanthen R, Slankamenac K, Breitenstein S, et al. The impact of complications on costs of major surgical procedures: a cost analysis of 1200 patients. Ann Surg. 2011;254:907–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Eappen S, Lane BH, Rosenberg B, et al. Relationship between occurrence of surgical complications and hospital finances. JAMA. 2013;309:1599–606.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Manecke G, Asemota A, Michard F. Tackling the economic burden of postsurgical complications: would goal directed fluid therapy help? Crit Care. 2014;18:566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Michard F, Mountford WK, Krukas MR, et al. Potential return on investment for implementation of perioperative goal-directed fluid therapy in major surgery: a nationwide database study. Perioper Med. 2015;4:11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ahmad T, Beilstein CM, Aldecoa C, et al. Variation in haemodynamic monitoring for major surgery in European nations: secondary analysis of the EuSOS dataset. Perioper Med. 2015;4:8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Myles PS, Bellomo R, Corcoran T, et al. Restrictive versus liberal fluid therapy for major abdominal surgery. N Engl J Med. 2018;378:2263–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hamilton MA, Cecconi M, Rhodes A. A systematic review and meta-analysis on the use of preemptive hemodynamic intervention to improve postoperative outcomes in moderate and high-risk surgical patients. Anesth Analg. 2011;112:1392–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Grocott MPW, Dushianthan A, Hamilton MA, et al. Perioperative increase in global blood flow to explicit defined goals and outcomes after surgery: a Cochrane systematic review. Br J Anaesth. 2013;111:535–48.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Pearse RM, Harrison DA, MacDonald N, et al. Effect of a perioperative, cardiac output-guided hemodynamic therapy algorithm on outcomes following major gastrointestinal surgery: a randomized clinical trial and systematic review. JAMA. 2014;311:2181–90.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Michard F, Giglio MT, Brienza N. Perioperative goal-directed therapy with uncalibrated pulse contour methods: impact on fluid management and postoperative outcome. Br J Anaesth. 2017;119:22–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Joshi GP, Kehlet H. CON: perioperative goal-directed fluid therapy is an essential element of an enhanced recovery protocol? Anesth Analg. 2016;122:1261–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Pestana D, Espinosa E, Eden A, et al. Perioperative goal-directed hemodynamic optimization using noninvasive cardiac output monitoring in major abdominal surgery: a prospective, randomized, multicenter, pragmatic trial: POEMAS Study (PeriOperative goal-directed therapy in Major Abdominal Surgery). Anesth Analg. 2014;119:579–87.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Stens J, Hering JP, van der Hoeven CWP, et al. The added value of cardiac index and pulse pressure variation monitoring to mean arterial pressure-guided volume therapy in moderate-risk abdominal surgery (COGUIDE): a pragmatic multicenter randomised controlled trial. Anaesthesia. 2017;72:1078–87.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Michard F. MERCI for improving quality of surgical care at no cost. World J Surg. 2016;40:3095–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Landais A, Morel M, Goldstein J, et al. Evaluation of financial burdens following complications after major surgery in France: potential returns after perioperative goal directed therapy. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2017;36:151–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Bartha E, Davidson T, Hommel A, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of goal-directed hemodynamic treatment of elderly hip fracture patients: before clinical research starts. Anesthesiology. 2012;117:519–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ebm C, Cecconi M, Sutton L. A cost-effectiveness analysis of postoperative goal directed therapy for high-risk surgical patients. Crit Care Med. 2014;42:1194–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Boyd O, Grounds M, Bennett ED. A randomized clinical trial of the effect of deliberate perioperative increase of oxygen delivery on mortality in high-risk surgical patients. JAMA. 1993;270:2699–707.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Wilson J, Woods I, Fawcett J, et al. Reducing the risk of major elective surgery: randomised controlled trial of preoperative optimisation of oxygen delivery. BMJ. 1999;318:1099–103.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Jin J, Min S, Liu D, et al. Clinical and economic impact of goal-directed fluid therapy during elective gastrointestinal surgery. Perioper Med. 2018;7:22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hand WR, Stoll WD, McEvoy MD, et al. Intraoperative goal-directed hemodynamic management in free tissue transfer for head and neck cancer. Head Neck. 2016;38:E1974–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Sadique Z, Harrison DA, Grieve R, et al. Cost-effectiveness of a cardiac output-guided haemodynamic therapy algorithm in high-risk patients undergoing major gastrointestinal surgery. Perioper Med. 2015;4:13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Flynn DN, Speck RM, Mahmoud NN, et al. The impact of complications following open colectomy on hospital finances: a retrospective cohort study. Perioper Med. 2014;3:1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Vincent JL, Pelosi P, Pearse R, et al. Perioperative cardiovascular monitoring of high-risk patients: a consensus of 12. Crit Care. 2015;19:224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F. Michard .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Michard, F., Manecke, G. (2019). Perioperative Hemodynamic Monitoring: MERCI to Predict Economic Impact. In: Vincent, JL. (eds) Annual Update in Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine 2019. Annual Update in Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-06067-1_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-06067-1_18

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-06066-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-06067-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics