Abstract
The authors Richard Rose and Caryn Peiffer discuss the meaning and standards of corruption by looking at countries in the Global North and Global South in their contribution entitled Understanding Corruption in Different Contexts. They refer to fuzzy and broad definitions of corruption in circulation worldwide and emphasize the demand for an integrated explanation of corruption by following an interdisciplinary approach. The chapter offers a review of social scientists’ theories about causes and consequences of corruption followed by new findings and evidence from a comparison of 122 countries around the globe assessed by the Global Corruption Barometer and 176 countries compared by the Corruption Perceptions Index of Transparency International. Rose and Peiffer find that generalizations about corruption in countries grouped according to geography and culture are misleading. Variations in national context within continents are greater than differences between mean ratings of continents. A superficial comparison of the degree of corruption across continents and countries of the Global South and North is fallacious. The authors suggest nine principles for reducing retail corruption with high practical value. In particular, they emphasize that reducing direct contact between public servants and citizens by delivering services electronically can result in more efficient public services at the grass roots and simultaneously lower the possibilities for corrupt behavior.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
See https://www.transparency.org/research/cpi accessed on July 15, 2018.
References
Dabla-Norris, E. (2002). A game theoretic analysis of corruption in bureaucracies. In G. T. Abed & S. Gupta (Eds.), Governance, corruption, and economic performance (pp. 111–134). Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.
Ekeh, P. P. (1975). Colonialism and the two publics in Africa: A theoretical statement. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 17(1), 91–112.
Fukuyama, F. (2001). Asian values in the wake of the Asian crisis. In F. Iqbal & J.-I. You (Eds.), Democracy, market economics and development (pp. 149–168). Washington DC: World Bank.
Gupta, A. (1995). Blurred boundaries: The discourse of corruption, the culture of politics, and the imagined state. American Ethnologist, 22(2), 375–402.
Heidenheimer, A. J., & Johnston, M. (2002). Political corruption: Concepts and contexts (3rd ed.). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
Hellman, J. S. (1998). Winners take all: The politics of partial reform in postcommunist transitions. World Politics, 50(2), 203–234.
Hirschman, A. (1963). Journeys toward progress. New York: Twentieth Century Fund.
Johnston, M. (2014). Corruption, contention and reform: The power of deep democratization. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Kurer, O. (2015). Definitions of corruption. In P. M. Heywood (Ed.), Routledge handbook of political corruption (pp. 30–41). Abingdon: Routledge.
Lambsdorff, J. G. (2007). The institutional economics of corruption and reform. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Manzetti, L., & Wilson, C. J. (2007). Why do corrupt governments maintain public support? Comparative Political Studies, 40(8), 949–970.
Mungiu-Pippidi, A. (2013). Becoming Denmark: Historical designs of corruption control. Social Research, 80(4), 1259–1286.
Mungiu-Pippidi, A. (2015). The quest for good governance: How societies develop control of corruption. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Persson, A., Rothstein, B., & Teorell, J. (2013). Why anticorruption reforms fail: Systemic corruption as a collective action problem. Governance, 26(3), 449–471.
Peters, B. G., & Pierre, J. (2004). Multi-level governance and democracy: A Faustian bargain? In I. Bache & M. Flinders (Eds.), Multi-level governance (pp. 78–89). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pierson, P. (2004). Politics in time: History, institutions and social analysis. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Potter, J. D., & Tavits, M. (2011). Curbing corruption with political institutions. In S. Rose-Ackerman & T. Soreide (Eds.), International handbook on the economics of corruption (pp. 52–80). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Rose, R. (2009). Understanding post-Communist transformation: A bottom up approach. London: Routledge.
Rose, R., & Peiffer, C. (2015). Paying bribes for public services: A global guide to grass-roots corruption. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Rose, R., & Peiffer, C. (2019). Bad governance and corruption. London: Palgrave Macmillan/Springer.
Rose-Ackerman, S., & Soreide, T. (2011). International handbook on the economics of corruption (Vol. 2). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Sajo, A. (2002). Clientelism and extortion: Corruption in transition. In S. Klotkin & A. Sajo (Eds.), Political corruption in transition: A sceptic’s handbook (pp. 1–22). Budapest: Central European University Press.
Samuelson, P. (1954). The pure theory of public expenditure. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 36(4), 387–389.
Solnick, S. L. (1998). Stealing the state: Control and collapse in soviet institutions. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Weber, M. (1947). The theory of social and economic organization (A. M. Henderson, & T. Parsons, Trans.). Glencoe, IL.: The Free Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rose, R., Peiffer, C. (2019). Understanding Corruption in Different Contexts. In: Grimm, H.M. (eds) Public Policy Research in the Global South. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-06061-9_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-06061-9_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-06060-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-06061-9
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)