Skip to main content

Neogeography: Rethinking Participatory Mapping and Place-Based Learning in the Age of the Geoweb

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
GIScience Teaching and Learning Perspectives

Part of the book series: Advances in Geographic Information Science ((AGIS))

Abstract

The term neogeography describes a new approach within GIScience teaching and research whereby geospatial technologies are becoming web-based and increasingly accessible to a broad range of developers and users. Through engaging with the geoweb (geospatial web-based applications), users are creating maps and sharing spatial data that is relevant to their own lives and experiences. The development of geoweb tools has been especially important for students and faculty members who engage in the practice of participatory mapping. In this chapter we describe how, in a university taught neogeography course, undergraduate students created participatory geoweb applications to address local issues. One student constructed a geoweb-based platform for civic dialogue; a second team of students designed and deployed an application to address the logistical challenges faced by a local grassroots organization. We draw on the pedagogic theory of place-based education (PBE) and consider it as an effective approach to teaching and learning neogeography. We observed how a PBE approach empowered students to critically and effectively engage in civic matters, become more invested in ‘place’ and actively learn directly about social justice issues. The approach also supported an increased academic engagement while providing a valuable learning experience in terms of developing technical, critical thinking and other soft skills.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    According to Semken and Freeman (2008), ‘a combined set of place meanings and place attachments, held by a person or a group, constitutes a functional definition of the sense of place’ (1043).

References

  • Bowers, A. (2008). Why a critical pedagogy of place is an oxymoron. Environmental Education Research, 14(3), 325–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, G., & Raymond, C. M. (2014). Methods for identifying land use conflict potential using participatory mapping. Landscape and Urban Planning, 122, 196–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corbett, J. (2009). Good practices in participatory mapping. Rome: International Fund for Agricultural Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coulson, M. R. C. (1977). Political truth and the graphic image. The Canadian Cartographer, 14(2), 101–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craig, W. J., & Elwood, S. (1998). How and why community groups use maps and geographic information. Cartography and Geographic Information Systems, 25(2), 95–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crutcher, M., & Zook, M. (2009). Placemarks and waterlines: Racialized cyberscapes in post-Katrina Google Earth. Geoforum, 40(4), 523–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dorling, D. (1998). Human cartography: When it is good to map. Environment and Planning A, 30, 277–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elfer, C. A. (2011). Place-based education: A review of historical precedents in theory and practice. PhD dissertation, University of Georgia, Athens.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elwood, S. (2002). GIS use in community planning: A multidimensional analysis of empowerment. Environment and Planning A, 34(5), 905–922.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elwood, S. (2008). Volunteered geographic information: Key questions, concepts and methods to guide emerging research and practice. GeoJournal, 72(3–4), 133–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elwood, S., & Ghose, R. (2001). PPGIS in community development planning: Framing the organizational context. Cartographica: The International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization, 38(3), 19–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elwood, S., & Leszczynski, A. (2011). Privacy, reconsidered: New representations, data practices, and the geoweb. Geoforum, 42(1), 6–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elwood, S., Schuurman, N., & Wilson, M. (2011). Critical GIS. In The Sage handbook of GIS and society (pp. 87–106). London: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Freire, P. (1996). Pedagogy of the oppressed. London: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghose, R. (2007). Politics of scale and networks of association in public participation GIS. Environment and Planning A, 39(8), 1961–1980.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodchild, M. F. (2007). Citizens as sensors: The world of volunteered geography. GeoJournal, 69(4), 211–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gruenewald, D. A. (2003). Foundations of place: A multidisciplinary framework for place-conscious education. American Educational Research Journal, 40(3), 619–654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gruenewald, D. A. (2005). Accountability and collaboration: Institutional barriers and strategic pathways for place-based education. Ethics, Place & Environment, 8(3), 261–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haklay, M., Singleton, A., & Parker, C. (2008). Web mapping 2.0: The neogeography of the Geoweb. Geography Compass, 2(6), 2011–2039.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, G. B., Chipeniuk, R., Feick, R. D., Leahy, M. G., & Deparday, V. (2010). Community-based production of geographic information using open source software and Web 2.0. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 24(5), 761–781.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harley, J. B. (1989). Deconstructing the map. Cartographica: The International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization, 26(2), 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jankowski, P. (2011). Designing public participation geographic information systems. In T. Nyerges, H. Couclelis, & R. McMaster (Eds.), The Sage handbook of GIS and society (p. 347). London/Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffery, C. (2014, November 5). More hungry mouths to feed this year in the Okanagan. Kelowna Now. Available from: http://www.kelownanow.com/columns/promotion/news/Promotion/14/11/05/More_Hungry_Mouths_to_Feed_This_Year_in_the_Okanagan. 5 November 2014.

  • Johnson, P. A., & Sieber, R. E. (2011). Motivations driving government adoption of the geoweb. GeoJournal, 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keen, A. (2007). The cult of the amateur: How blogs, MySpace, YouTube, and the rest of today’s user-generated media are destroying our economy, our culture, and our values. New York: Broadway Business.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kienberger, S. (2014). Participatory mapping of flood hazard risk in Munamicua, District of Búzi, Mozambique. Journal of Maps, 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingston, R. (2011). Online public participation GIS for spatial planning. In T. Nyerges, H. Couclelis, & R. McMaster (Eds.), The Sage handbook of GIS and society (p. 361). London/Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kwan, M. P. (2002). Feminist visualization: re-envisioning GIS as a method in feminist geographic research. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 92(4), 645–661.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laituri, M. (2003). The issue of access: An assessment guide for evaluating public participation geographic information science case studies. Urisa Journal, 15(2), 25–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leitner, H., McMaster, R. B., Elwood, S., McMaster, S., & Sheppard, E. (2002). Models for making GIS available to community organizations: Dimensions of difference and appropriateness. In W. Craig, T. Harris, & D. Weiner (Eds.), Community participation and geographic information systems (pp. 37–52). London: Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewthwaite, B. (2007). From school to community-based school: The influence of an aboriginal principal on culture-based school development. Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy, (64), 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Livingstone, D. (1992). The geographers tradition. Oxford: Blackwells.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macintyre, B. (2008, March 14). Whatever next: A map of Utopia – Thanks to the internet we are living in a golden age of cartography. Times of London.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCall, K., Martínez, J. A., & Verplanke J. J. (2014). Shifting boundaries of volunteered geographic information systems and modalities: learning from PGIS. ACME: An International E–journal for Critical Geographies: Open Access, 36.

    Google Scholar 

  • McInerney, P., Smyth, J., & Down, B. (2011). ‘Coming to a place near you?’ The politics and possibilities of a critical pedagogy of place-based education. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 39(1), 3–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michaels, K. (2014). Close up: Kelowna farm to table movement flourishing. Kelowna Capital News. Available from: http://www.kelownacapnews.com/news/265833601.html. 4 November 2014.

  • Panek, J. (2014). How participatory mapping can drive community empowerment--a case study of Koffiekraal, South Africa. South African Geographical Journal (ahead-of-print), 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, B. (2006). Constructing community through maps? Power and praxis in community mapping. The Professional Geographer, 58(4), 470–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poole, P. (1995). Geomatics, who needs it? Cultural Survival Quarterly, 18, 1–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powers, A. L. (2004). An evaluation of four place-based education programs. Journal of Environmental Education, 35(4), 17–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rambaldi, G., Chambers, R., McCall, M., & Fox, J. (2006). Practical ethics for PGIS practitioners, facilitators, technology intermediaries and researchers. Participatory Learning and Action, 54(1), 106–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharl, A., & Tochtermann, K. (2007). The geospatial web: How geobrowsers, social software and the web 2.0 are shaping the network society. London: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schlottmann, C. (2005). Introduction: Place-based and environmental education. Ethics, Place & Environment, 8(3), 257–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Semken, S., & Freeman, C. B. (2008). Sense of place in the practice and assessment of place-based science teaching. Science Education, 92(6), 1042–1057.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sieber, R. E. (2006). Public participation geographic information systems: A literature review and framework. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 96(3), 491–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sieber, R. E. (2007). Spatial data access by the grassroots. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 34(1), 47–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, G. A. (2007). Place-based education: Breaking through the constraining regularities of public school. Environmental Education Research, 13(2), 189–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephens, M. (2013). Gender and the GeoWeb: Divisions in the production of user-generated cartographic information. GeoJournal, 78(6), 981–996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sui, D., & DeLyser, D. (2012). Crossing the qualitative-quantitative chasm I Hybrid geographies, the spatial turn, and volunteered geographic information (VGI). Progress in Human Geography, 36(1), 111–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sui, D. Z., & Holt, J. B. (2008). Visualizing and analysing public-health data using value-by-area cartograms: Toward a new synthetic framework. Cartographica, 43(1), 3–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuan, Y.-F. (1990). Topophilia: A Study of Environmental Perceptions, Attitudes, and Values. Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tulloch, D. (2008). Is VGI participation? From vernal pools to video games. GeoJournal, 72, 161–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, A. (2006). Introduction to neogeography. Sebastopol: O’Reilly Media, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warf, B., & Sui, D. (2010). From GIS to neogeography: Ontological implications and theories of truth. Annals of GIS, 16(4), 197–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, D. (1992). The power of maps. New York: The Guildford Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Andrew Barton, author of the Places and Pipelines project, as well as Travis Eek, Stevie Frew, Liz Waterfield and Alex Rutledge, the creators of the Okanagan Fruit Tree Project web map. We would also like to acknowledge Casey Hamilton and Ailsa Beischer from the Okanagan Fruit Tree Project for their input, ideas and support of the geoweb project. Finally we would like to thank Nick Blackwell, the head Geolive programmer, and Joanne Carey, the Centre for Social, Spatial and Economic Justice administrator.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jon Corbett .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Corbett, J., Legault, G. (2019). Neogeography: Rethinking Participatory Mapping and Place-Based Learning in the Age of the Geoweb. In: Balram, S., Boxall, J. (eds) GIScience Teaching and Learning Perspectives. Advances in Geographic Information Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-06058-9_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics