Skip to main content

“Who Are ‘They’?”: Further Education Regarding Diversity

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 454 Accesses

Abstract

The increasing diversity in Germany, due to migrant movements and demographic change, challenges both arts educators and cultural institutions alike. Some are reaching out to new target groups – both as audience and participants. Others already deal with diverse target groups on a daily basis. In both contexts the need for appropriate approaches and development of suitable arts education is clear – and the challenge considerable (Keuchel and Kelb, Diversität in der kulturellen Bildung. Perspektivwechsel kulturelle Bildung. transcript, Bielefeld, 2015). So far, there is little research available on how sensitivity to diversity is put into action. This article is offered as a first step towards understanding how further education can be offered in more diversity-friendly ways. Throughout this paper the “hows” will be referred to as “working principles” and “general conditions”. They are the result of evaluation findings from the further education program VIEL – Diversity in arts education. The programme was implemented and organised by the Zukunftsakademie NRW (In English: Academy of the future, North-Rhine Westphalia. For more information see: www.zaknrw.de) (Bochum) in 2016. They describe themselves as a “platform for diversity and arts education” influencing the debate and providing knowledge and exchange. We were invited to evaluate the programme, focusing on how diversity was addressed and whether general principles were evident. The data was gathered by participant observation (Goffman, Kommunikative Lebenswelten. Zur Ethnografie einer geschwätzigen Gesellschaft. UVK, Konstanz, 1996) and then analysed following grounded theory standards (Strauss A, Corbin J, Grounded theory. Grundlagen qualitativer Sozialforschung. Beltz, Weinheim, 2010). Four working principles were identified: biographicity, reflexivity, discoursivity and embodiment. Furthermore, some insights regarding general project conditions were evident. We start with a summary of the general German debate on diversity in arts education and continue with an outline of the specific further education programme. Based on this, we elaborate the key findings. Finally, consequences for the area of practice are discussed.

This article has been published before in German: Eger and Schulte (2017).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Here, diversity refers to the various dimensions of diversity as listed by the association charter of diversity (German: Charta der Vielfalt e.V.). Dimensions of diversity may refer to gender, race, class, religion, age, ability or professional background, for example. The charter of diversity is a registered association promoting diversity as a benefit for enterprises and institutions. Companies and businesses can sign the charter and take part in projects such as “Diversity Day” and devote themselves to the issue of diversity. Looking at the assigned companies, not very many cultural or arts institutions are assigned members yet. More: www.charta-der-vielfalt.de

  2. 2.

    For example: Akademie der Kulturellen Bildung des Bundes und des Landes NRW, 2016 (Academy of Arts Education of the German Government and State of North Rhine-Westphalia) and the Bundesakademie Kulturelle Bildung (Federal Academy of Cultural Education).

  3. 3.

    Due to a lack of an English title in most cases, a rough and rather free translation is given. The German title is indicated in a footnote. Here: “Sprachen sprechen über”.

  4. 4.

    German: “Kunst im interreligiösen Dialog”.

  5. 5.

    Once a year, the German government awards this prize to honour three outstanding projects of arts education.

  6. 6.

    They worked for the department for arts education at a theatre located in Berlin.

  7. 7.

    German: “Postmigrantische Identitäten”.

  8. 8.

    Participatory Video has become a well-known approach to enable groups of people or communities to share their views, express their voice and discuss certain (social) issues through the medium of video making.

  9. 9.

    German: “Tarab – oder Wie klingt der Orient?”

  10. 10.

    About one third of the participants were present.

  11. 11.

    The micro-level refers to personal-individual aspects of the teaching artist. The meso-level describes the professional, i.e., workshop-related level. The macro-level refers to a wider, socio-political context.

  12. 12.

    Here, the glossary “Language shapes reality” (2013) published by the anti-discrimination agency, Cologne, serves as a reference for political correct language.

  13. 13.

    It should be kept in mind though that only on-spot reactions (as well as written feedback) were part of this evaluation. Therefore, long-term, subconscious effects of the language used remain unexamined.

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nana Eger .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Eger, N., Schulte, C. (2019). “Who Are ‘They’?”: Further Education Regarding Diversity. In: Ferro, L., Wagner, E., Veloso, L., IJdens, T., Teixeira Lopes, J. (eds) Arts and Cultural Education in a World of Diversity. Yearbook of the European Network of Observatories in the Field of Arts and Cultural Education (ENO). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-06007-7_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-06007-7_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-06006-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-06007-7

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics