Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Characteristics of the Relations and Tourism Flows Between Poland and Germany

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Cross-Border Tourism in Protected Areas

Part of the book series: Geographies of Tourism and Global Change ((GTGC))

  • 342 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter discusses the development and current situation of relations between Poland and Germany and their respective tourism flows. First, we summarize the post-war relations between Poland and Germany, followed by an overview of the cultural similarities and the two countries’ mutual images. In terms of tourism, there is an asymmetry between the respective roles of tourism in the Polish and German economies due to both Germany’s significant place as a receiving destination and its even more important role as a source of outgoing tourism for the global tourism industry. Family/friend relationships generate by far the largest share of cross-border tourism between the two nations. However, with improving economic conditions in Poland, the importance of international travel for both commercial and recreation /holiday purposes is also increasing, as reflected in the growing number of arrivals and overnight stays in Germany. Regions like Brandenburgia and Zachodngiopomorskie voivodeship —both situated in the Polish-German border area – are benefitting significantly from international tourism between the countries. In particular, the Polish voivodeship profits from this relation of proximity . In the latter region, the share of German tourists among total overnight stays by foreigners in 2015 was close to 90%.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Besier (2012) suggests that the idea of the Oder-Neisse border after 1945 lacks historical foundations and was mostly imposed by Polish nationalists who, encouraged by their successes on the eastern borders, had similarly tried to take over German territories in the aftermath of the First World War.

  2. 2.

    In the first three quarters of 2017, Germany accounted for 27.4% of Polish exports and 23.0% of Polish imports (calculations based on GUS, 2018).

  3. 3.

    “Nazi” in English .

  4. 4.

    Second worldwide after the United States.

  5. 5.

    For example, Boeters, Böhringer, Büttner, & Kraus (2010) showed the positive role of this (internally-criticized) VAT cut for the tourism industry.

  6. 6.

    Excluding breakfasts and taxes.

  7. 7.

    Exchange rate for USD to PLN = 3.9 PLN.

  8. 8.

    Polish citizens staying abroad at the end of the year.

  9. 9.

    An international personnel consultancy and temporary employment agency.

  10. 10.

    Gmyz refers to the exhibition of the best masterpieces of MoMA (Museum of Modern Art in New York) in Berlin .

References

  • Albrecht, G., Albrecht, W., & Bütow, M. (1996). Vorpommern—Stiefkind der Entwicklung? Geographische Rundschau, 48(9), 494–500.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albu, C.-E. (2013). Stereotypical factors in tourism. Cross-Cultural Management Journal XV(1), 5–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amt für Statistik Berlin-Brandenburg. (2016). Statistisches Jahrbuch 2016—Berlin. https://www.statistik-berlin-brandenburg.de/produkte/Jahrbuch/BE_Kap_2016.asp. Accessed 23 March 2018.

  • Anschütz, C. (2005). Vorurteile und Stereotypen in den deutsch-polnischen Beziehungen und ihre innenpolitische Instrumentalisierung. In: Forschungsstelle Osteuropa an der Universität Bremen, Osteuropa-Institut der Freien Universität Berlin, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Osteuropakunde, & Europäische Akademie Berlin (Eds.), Integration und Ausgrenzung im Osten Europas (pp. 30–34). Bremen: Forschungsstelle Osteuropa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balogh, P. (2014). Perpetual borders: German-Polish cross-border contacts in the Szczecin area. Stockholm: Department of Human Geography, Stockholm University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Besier, G. (2012). German-Polish neighbourhood relations on the shared border: An ambiguous story. In K. Katajala & M. Lähteenmäki (Eds.), Imagined, negotiated, remembered: Constructing European borders and borderlands (pp. 197–214). Münster: LIT Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Best, U. (2007). Transgression as a rule. German-Polish cross-border cooperation, border discourse and EU-enlargement. Münster: LIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boensch, M. (2013). Kulturelle Unterschiede in der deutsch-polnischen Wirtschaftskommunikation. Fiktion oder Realität? Eine soziokulturelle Umweltanalyse. Dissertation Europa-Universität Viadrina Frankfurt/Oder: Frankfurt/Oder.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boeters, S., Böhringer, C., Büttner, T., & Kraus, M. (2010). Economic effects of VAT reforms in Germany. Applied Economics, 42(17), 2165–2182. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036840701857952.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BTE Tourismus- und Regionalberatung. (2016). Naturtourismus in Deutschland 2016. http://naturerlebnis-deutschland.de/ueber-uns/downloads. Accessed 01 January 2018.

  • Bundesverband der deutschen Tourismuswirtschaft e.V. (BTW) (2018). Mehrwertsteuer Hotellerie. http://www.btw.de/themen/mehrwertsteuer-hotellerie.html. Accessed 23 March 2018.

  • Centre for Public Opinion Research TNS (TNS OBOB). (2012). Badanie konsumentów usług turystycznych w Polsce. Warszawa: TNS OBOB.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christaller, W. (1964). Some considerations of tourism location in Europe: The peripheral regions - underdeveloped countries - recreation areas. Regional Science Association Papers, 12, 95–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dąbrowska, J. (1999). Stereotype und ihr sprachlicher Ausdruck im Polenbild der deutschen Presse. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deckers, B. (2003). Zur Interaktion im nördlichen deutsch-polnischen Grenzraum – Befragungsergebnisse in Vorpommern (BRD) und Westpommern (RP). In Verein Regional- und Tourismusforschung Greifswald/Vorpommern (Ed.), Aktuelle Probleme der Regionalentwicklung in Mecklenburg-Vorpommern (pp. 106–115). Greifswald: Selbstverlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsche Zentrale für Tourismus e. V. (DZT). (2016). Marktinformation. Incoming-Tourismus. Deutschland 2017—Polen. Frankfurt/Main: Deutsche Zentrale für Tourismus e.V. https://www.germany.travel/media/pdf/marktinformationen__lang_/regionalmanagement_nordosteuropa/Polen.pdf. Accessed 01 January 2018.

  • Eurostat—Data Explorer. (2017). http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/data/database. Accessed 14 July 2017.

  • Federal Statistical Office (Destatis). Population: Länder, reference date. https://www-genesis.destatis.de/genesis/online/data. Accessed 18 February 2017.

  • FUR—Forschungsgemeinschaft Urlaub und Reisen e.V. (2015). ReiseAnalyse 2015. Erste Ausgewählte Ergebnisse der 45. Reiseanalyse zur ITB 2015. www.fur.de/fileadmin/user_upload/RA_2015/RA2015_Erste_Ergebnisse_DE.pdf. Accessed 01 January 2018.

  • Gatzke, N. (2010). Polenbild in Deutschland: Wandel und Kontinuität—von Polen als Gegenbild der Aufklärung bis zur EU-Reformdebatte. Potsdam. http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-290503. Accessed 10 April 2018.

  • German National Tourist Board. (2015). Incoming-tourism Germany 2014. Frankfurt/Main: German National Tourist Board.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gmyz, C., 2004. Berlinowo. Wprost.pl. https://www.wprost.pl/tygodnik/67870/berlinowo.html. Accessed 11 September 2017.

  • GUS BDL. Stan ludności. https://bdl.stat.gov.pl/BDL/dane/temat. Accessed 22 March 2017.

  • GUS Mapa Polski. Główny Urząd Statystyczny. http://stat.gov.pl/statystyka-regionalna/jednostki-terytorialne/nomenklatura-nts. Accessed 22 March 2017.

  • GUS. (2007). Turystyka w 2006 r. Warszawa: GUS w Rzeszowie.

    Google Scholar 

  • GUS. (2008). Turystyka w 2007 r. Warszawa: GUS w Rzeszowie.

    Google Scholar 

  • GUS. (2009). Turystyka w 2008 r. Warszawa: GUS w Rzeszowie.

    Google Scholar 

  • GUS. (2010). Turystyka w 2009 r. Warszawa: GUS w Rzeszowie.

    Google Scholar 

  • GUS. (2011). Turystyka w 2010 r. Warszawa: GUS w Rzeszowie.

    Google Scholar 

  • GUS. (2012). Turystyka w 2011 r. Warszawa: GUS w Rzeszowie.

    Google Scholar 

  • GUS. (2013). Turystyka w 2012 r. Warszawa: GUS w Rzeszowie.

    Google Scholar 

  • GUS. (2014). Turystyka w 2013 r. Warszawa: GUS w Rzeszowie.

    Google Scholar 

  • GUS. (2015a). Turystyka w 2014 r. Warszawa: GUS w Rzeszowie.

    Google Scholar 

  • GUS (2015b, August 20). Główne kierunki emigracji i imigracji w latach 1966–2014 (migracje na pobyt stały). https://stat.gov.pl/obszary-tematyczne/ludnosc/migracje-zagraniczne-ludnosci/glowne-kierunki-emigracji-i-imigracji-w-latach-1966-2014-migracje-na-pobyt-staly,4,1.html. Accessed 8 November 2017.

  • GUS. (2016a). Obroty towarowe handlu zagranicznego ogółem i według krajów w 2015 r. Warszawa: GUS.

    Google Scholar 

  • GUS. (2016b). Ruch graniczny oraz wydatki cudzoziemców w Polsce i Polaków za granicą w 2015 r. Warszawa-Rzeszów: GUS.

    Google Scholar 

  • GUS. (2016c). Turystyka w 2015 r. Rzeszów: GUS w Rzeszowie.

    Google Scholar 

  • GUS. (2018). Foreign trade. I-IX 2017. http://stat.gov.pl/en/topics/prices-trade/trade/foreign-trade-i-ix-2017,5,14.html. Accessed 23 March 2018.

  • Instytut Turystyki SGTiR. (2015). Wskaźnik Użyteczności Turystyki Zagranicznej—WUTZ 2015 (No. 51/DS/JW.?2015) (p. 26). Warszawa: Instytut Turystyki - Szkoła Główna Turystyki i Rekreacji.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janczak, K., & Patelak, K. (2014). Aktywność turystyczna mieszkańców Polski w 2013 r. Łódź: Active Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janiak, M., (2010). Ze Szczecina do Berlina pojedziemy szybciej i taniej. gs24.pl. http://www.gs24.pl/turystyka/art/5403502,ze-szczecina-do-berlina-pojedziemy-szybciej-i-taniej,id,t.html. Accessed 11 September 2017.

  • Kaczmarek, T., & Stryjakiewicz, T. (2006). Grenzüberschreitende Entwicklung und Kooperation im deutsch-polnischen Grenzraum aus polnischer Sicht. Europa Regional, 14(2), 61–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kagermeier, A. (2016). Tourismusgeographie. Konstanz: UVK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolosov, V., & Więckowski, M. (2018). Border changes in Eastern and Central Europe – an introduction. Geographia Polonica, 91(1), 5–16. https://doi.org/10.7163/GPol.0106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kostrzewa, Z. (2016, May 9). Informacja o rozmiarach i kierunkach czasowej emigracji z Polski w latach 2004–2015. Główny Urząd Statystyczny.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krajewski, C. (2018). Peuplierung einer klassischen Peripherie? Wohnmigrations‐ und Integ-rationsprozesse von Polen im deutschen Grenzgebiet der Euroregion POMERANIA. In M. Heintel, R. Musil, N. Weixlbaumer (Eds.), Grenzen. Theoretische, konzeptionelle und praxisbezogene Fragestellungen zu Grenzen und deren Überschreitungen (pp. 309–336). Wiesbaden: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kucharczyk, J., Łada, A., Ochmann, C., & Wenerski, Ł. (2013). Im Osten was Neues? Das Bild Polens und Russlands in Deutschland 2013. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann Stiftung. www.bertelsmann-stiftung.de/fileadmin/files/BSt/Presse/imported/downloads/xcms_bst_dms_38185_38186_2.pdf. Accessed 23 March 2018.

  • Kunzmann, K. R. (2001). State planning: A German success story? International Planning Studies, 6(2), 153–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563470125630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leszkowicz-Baczynska, Ż. (2013). Der Deutsche heute: Die Wahrnehmung der Anwohner in der Grenzwoiwodschaft Lebuser Land. Polen-Analysen, 136, 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luberda, M. (2014). Uczestnictwo Polaków w krajowych i zagranicznych wyjazdach turystycznych i ich kierunki. Rozprawy Naukowe Akademii Wychowania Fizycznego we Wrocławiu, 47, 13–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Łaciak, J. (2002). Uczestnictwo Polaków w wyjazdach turystycznych w 2001 r. Warszawa: Instytut Turystyki.

    Google Scholar 

  • Łaciak, J. (2003). Uczestnictwo Polaków w wyjazdach turystycznych w 2002 r. Warszawa: Instytut Turystyki.

    Google Scholar 

  • Łaciak, J. (2004). Uczestnictwo Polaków w wyjazdach turystycznych w 2003 r. Warszawa: Instytut Turystyki.

    Google Scholar 

  • Łaciak, J. (2007). Uczestnictwo Polaków w wyjazdach turystycznych w 2006 r. Warszawa: Instytut Turystyki.

    Google Scholar 

  • Łaciak, J. (2009). Uczestnictwo Polaków w wyjazdach turystycznych w 2008 r. Warszawa: Instytut Turystyki.

    Google Scholar 

  • Łada, A. (2016). Deutsch-Polnisches Barometer 2016. Gegenseitige Wahrnehmung der Polen und Deutschen 25. Jahre nach der Unterzeichnung des Nachbarschaftsvertrages. www.isp.org.pl/barometr2016/de/runterladen.pdf. Accessed 21 April 2017.

  • Ładykowska, A., & Ładykowski, P. (2013). Anthropology of borders and frontiers. The case of the Polish-German borderland (1945–1980). In A. Lechevalier & J. Wielgohs (Eds.), Borders and border regions in Europe: Changes, challenges and chances (pp. 159–182). Bielefeld: transcript Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ładykowski, P. (2011). The emerging Polish-German borderland: The past and the present. Baltic Journal of European Studies, 1(2), 167–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malchow, E. (2015). Deutsch-polnische Stereotype in neuen Medien. Berlin: Epubli.

    Google Scholar 

  • MTiS. (2016). Charakterystyka przyjazdów cudzoziemców do Polski w 2015 roku. Warszawa: Departament Turystyki - Ministerstwo Turystyki i Sportu.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2016). OECD Tourism Trends and Policies 2016. Paris: OECD Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2018). International migration database. https://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=MIG. Accessed 3 January 2019.

  • Orłowski, H. (1996). “Polnische Wirtschaft”. Zum deutschen Polendiskurs der Neuzeit. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Partner in Business Strategies (PBS). (2013). Skuteczność kampanii promocyjnej Polski. Sopot: Partner in Business Strategies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Partner in Business Strategies (PBS). (2015). Satysfakcja Turystów 2015. Sopot: Partner in Business Strategies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polish National Contact Point to the European Migration Network. (2011). Temporary and Circular Migration in Poland: Empirical Evidence, Current Policy Practice and Future Options. Reference Years: 2004–2009. Warsaw.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polish Tourist Organization (POT). (2015). Analiza rynków zagranicznych na podstawie sprawozdań zagranicznych ośrodków Polskiej Organizacji Turystycznej 2015. Warszawa: Polska Organizacja Turystyczna.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polish Tourist Organization (POT). (2016a). Opinie o Polsce. Obcokrajowcy. Warszawa: Polska Organizacja Turystyczna.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polish Tourist Organization (POT). (2016b). Ekoturystyka w Polsce 2016. Warszawa: Polska Organizacja Turystyczna.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raabe, S. (2006). Mehr Akzeptanz und Sympathie: Deutschland und die Deutschen in den Augen der Polen 1999–2005. Ergebnisse einer repräsentativen Umfrage. Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung Auslandsinformationen 6, 4–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radio Poland. (2014). Polish 2013 Emigration close to record high. http://www.thenews.pl/1/9/Artykul/182451,Polish-2013-emigration-close-to-record-high. Accessed 23 March 2018.

  • Reisinger, Y. (2009). International tourism. Cultures and behaviour. Oxford: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romaniec, Róża. (2009, June 8). Berlin Kusi Polskich Turystów. DW.com. http://www.dw.com/pl/berlin-kusi-polskich-turyst%C3%B3w/a-4544691. Accessed 23 March 2018.

  • Roose, J. (2010). Der Index kultureller Ähnlichkeit. Konstruktion und Diskussion. Berlin: Institut für Soziologie. http://www.polsoz.fu-berlin.de/soziologie/arbeitsbereiche/makrosoziologie/arbeitspapiere/bsse_21.html. Accessed 23 March 2018.

  • Roose, J. (2012). Die quantitative Bestimmung kultureller Unterschiedlichkeit in Europa. Vorschlag für einen Index kultureller Ähnlichkeit. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 64(2), 361–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roose, J. (n.Y.). Datendownload zum Index kultureller Ähnlichkeit. http://userpage.fu-berlin.de/~jroose/indexkultahn/main_daten.htm. Accessed 23 March 2018.

  • Ruchniewicz, K. (2008). Stehlen die Polen immer noch die deutschen Autos? Zur Aktualität der polnisch-deutschen Stereotype. Polen-Analysen, 40, 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rykiel, Z. (1995). European boundaries in spatial research. In T. Marszał (Ed.), European spatial research and policy: Interdisciplinary studies on environment, society, and economy (pp. 35–47). Łódź: University of Łódź.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheffer, J. (2014). Grenzüberschreitende Tourismusdestinationen und Interkulturalität. In H. Pechlaner & J. Jochmann (Eds.), Grenzüberschreitende Kooperation im Tourismus – Strategien zur Produkt- und Angebotsentwicklung (pp. 25–35). Berlin: Erich Schmidt Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuler, A., & Rein, H. (2016). Der Naturerlebnis-Monitor Deutschland - ein Markforschungsinstrument für den Naturtourismus. In M. Mayer & H. Job (Eds.), Naturtourismus—Chancen und Herausforderungen (pp. 169–186). Mannheim: MetaGIS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serrier, T. (2013). Historical culture and territoriality. Social appropriation in the German-Polish border region in the 19th and 20th centuries. In A. Lechevalier & J. Wielgohs (Eds.), Borders and border regions in europe: Changes, challenges and chances (pp. 201–216). Bielefeld: transcript Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statistisches Bundesamt. (2006). Tourismus in Zahlen 2005. Wiesbaden: Statistisches Bundesamt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statistisches Bundesamt. (2007). Tourismus in Zahlen 2006. Wiesbaden: Statistisches Bundesamt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statistisches Bundesamt. (2008). Tourismus in Zahlen 2007. Wiesbaden: Statistisches Bundesamt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statistisches Bundesamt. (2009a). Tourismus in Zahlen 2008. Wiesbaden: Statistisches Bundesamt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statistisches Bundesamt. (2009b). Tourismus in Zahlen 2009. Wiesbaden: Statistisches Bundesamt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statistisches Bundesamt. (2011). Tourismus in Zahlen 2010. Wiesbaden: Statistisches Bundesamt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statistisches Bundesamt. (2012). Tourismus in Zahlen 2011. Wiesbaden: Statistisches Bundesamt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statistisches Bundesamt. (2013). Tourismus in Zahlen 2012. Wiesbaden: Statistisches Bundesamt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statistisches Bundesamt. (2014). Tourismus in Zahlen 2013. Wiesbaden: Statistisches Bundesamt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statistisches Bundesamt. (2015). Tourismus in Zahlen 2014. Wiesbaden: Statistisches Bundesamt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statistisches Bundesamt. (2016). Tourismus in Zahlen 2015. Wiesbaden: Statistisches Bundesamt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statistisches Bundesamt. (2018). Außenhandel. Wiesbaden: Statistisches Bundesamt. https://www.destatis.de/DE/ZahlenFakten/GesamtwirtschaftUmwelt/Aussenhandel/Aussenhandel.html. Accessed 23 March 2018.

  • Stryjakiewicz, T. (1998). The changing role of border zones in the transforming economies of East-Central Europe: The case of Poland. GeoJournal 44(3), 203-213. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006866122198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szytniewski, B. (2013). The dynamics of unfamiliarity in the German-Polish border region in 1970s, 1980s, and 1990s. In A. Lechevalier & J. Wielgohs (Eds.), Borders and border regions in Europe: Changes, challenges and chances (pp. 183–199). Bielefeld: transcript Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teufel, N. (2015). Von den Wunden der Geschichte zu den Laboren für das neue Europa? Geteilte Grenzstädte entlang der polnisch-deutschen Grenze. Geographische Rundschau 67(11), 10-17.

    Google Scholar 

  • The World Travel & Tourism Council (WTTC). (2015). Travel & tourism. Economic impact 2015—Germany. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNWTO. (2016). UNWTO. Tourism highlights. Madrid: UNWTO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walas, B. (Ed.). (2011, May 12). Marketingowa strategia Polski w sektorze turystyki na lata 2012–2020. Polska Agencja Turystyczna.

    Google Scholar 

  • Więckowski, M. (2010). Tourism development in the borderlands of Poland. Geographia Polonica, 83(2), 67–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Więckowski, M. (2018). From periphery and the doubled national trails to the cross-border thematic trails: New cross-border tourism in Poland. In D. K. Müller & M. Więckowski (Eds.), Tourism in transitions. Recovering decline, managing change (pp. 173–186). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wirtualna Polska. (2013). Berlin—Polacy nad Sprewą. http://turystyka.wp.pl/berlin-polacy-nad-sprewa-6043965757227649g. Accessed 11 September 2017.

  • Work Service. (2017). Migracje Zarobkowe Polaków (No. VI) (p. 28). Warszawa: Work Service.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Geography and Geology, Universität Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany

    Marius Mayer & Johanna Gernert

  2. Department of System Analysis and Finance, West Pomeranian University of Technology, Szczecin, Poland

    Wojciech Zbaraszewski

  3. University of Life Sciences in Poznań, Poznań, Poland

    Dariusz Pieńkowski

  4. LVR-Kulturzentrum Abtei Brauweiler, Landschaftsverband Rheinland (LVR), Pulheim, Germany

    Gabriel Gach

Authors
  1. Marius Mayer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Wojciech Zbaraszewski
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Dariusz Pieńkowski
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Gabriel Gach
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Johanna Gernert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marius Mayer .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Mayer, M., Zbaraszewski, W., Pieńkowski, D., Gach, G., Gernert, J. (2019). Characteristics of the Relations and Tourism Flows Between Poland and Germany. In: Cross-Border Tourism in Protected Areas. Geographies of Tourism and Global Change. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05961-3_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05961-3_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-05960-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-05961-3

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation