Skip to main content

Small Modular Reactors and Innovative Efficient Enhancement Design

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Heat Pipe Applications in Fission Driven Nuclear Power Plants
  • 841 Accesses

Abstract

The smaller-sized nuclear reactors were becoming instrumental during the pioneering days of commercial nuclear power to facilitate the development and demonstration of early reactor technologies and to establish operational experience for the fledgling nuclear power industry starting with first powered US Navy nuclear submarine. As part of innovative approach in design of Small Modular Reactors (SMRs) in new era of nuclear power energy to meet the demand for electricity due to growth of population, researchers are in quest of a more efficient electrical out power by these types of reactors known as Advanced Small Modular Reactors (AdvSMRs) suggested as the air-Brayton cycle is an open-air cycle and the Steam-Rankine cycle is a closed cycle. The air-Brayton cycle for a natural gas-driven power plant must be an open cycle, where the air is drawn in from the environment and exhausted with the products of combustion to the environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Zohuri, B. (2015). Combined cycle driven efficiency for next generation nuclear power plants: An innovative design approach (1st ed.). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Zohuri, B., & McDaniel, P. (2017). Combined cycle driven efficiency for next generation nuclear power plants: An innovative design approach (2nd ed.). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Zohuri, B. (2018). Small modular reactors as renewable energy sources. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Retrieved from http://www.ne.doe.gov/geniv/neGenIV1.html.

  5. Sustainable Nuclear Energy Technology Platform. (2009, May). Strategic research agenda. Retrieved from www.SNETP.eu.

  6. OECD. (2008). Uranium 2007: Resources, production and demand. OECD Nuclear Energy Agency and the International Atomic Energy Agency, NEA N 6345.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Nuclear Energy Agency. (2008). Nuclear Energy Outlook 2008 (OECD/NEA Report No. 6348). Paris: Nuclear Energy Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. (2009, May). 2009 Update of the MIT 2003 future of nuclear power, an interdisciplinary MIT study, 2003. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Retrieved from http://web.mit.edu/nuclearpower/pdf/nuclearpower-update2009.pdf.

  9. Retrieved from http://www.ne.doe.gov/pdfFiles/NGNP_reporttoCongress.pdf.

  10. Updated emissions projections. (2006, July). DTI. Retrieved from http://www.dti.gov.uk/files/file31861.pdf.

  11. DTI: Energy White Paper, Meeting the Energy Challenge. Retrieved from http://www.dti.gov.uk/energy/whitepaper.

  12. Retrieved from http://www.ne.doe.gov/geniv/documents/gen_iv_roadmap.pdf/.

  13. Proposal for a COUNCIL DIRECTIVE (EURATOM) setting up a Community framework for nuclear safety COM(2008) 790/3. (2008, November).

    Google Scholar 

  14. COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION Legislative Acts and Other Instruments 10667/09. (2009, June).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Yan, X. L. Japan Atomic Agency, Oarai-Machi, Ibaraki-ken, Japan.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sato, H., Yan, X. L., Tachibana, Y., & Kunitomi, K. (2014). GTHTR300dA nuclear power plant design with 50% generating efficiency. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 275, 190–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Yan, X., Sato, H., Kamiji, Y., Imai, Y., Terada, A., Tachibana, Y., et al. (2014). GTHTR300 cost reduction through design upgrade and cogeneration. Paper HTR2014-21436. In Proceedings of the HTR 2014, Weihai, China, October 27–31.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Fu, J., Jiang, Y., Cheng, H., & Cheng, W. (2014). Overview and progress of high temperature reactor pebble-bed module demonstration project (HTR-PM), HTR2014-11125. In Proceedings of the HTR 2014, Weihai, China, October 27–31.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Petti, D. (2014). Implications of results from the advanced gas reactor fuel development and qualification program on licensing of modular HTGRs. Paper HTR2014-31252. In Proceedings of the HTR 2014, Weihai, China, October 27–31.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Shahrokhi, F., Lommers, L., Mayer, J., III, & Southworth, F. (2014). US HTGR deployment challenges and strategies. Paper HTR2014-11309. In Proceedings of the HTR 2014, Weihai, China, October 27–31.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Zohuri, B. (2018). Hydrogen energy: Challenges and solutions for a cleaner future (1st ed.). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Retrieved from https://www.terrestrialenergy.com/technology/.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Zohuri, B. (2019). Small Modular Reactors and Innovative Efficient Enhancement Design. In: Heat Pipe Applications in Fission Driven Nuclear Power Plants. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05882-1_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05882-1_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-05881-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-05882-1

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics