Skip to main content

Measures of Tractography Convergence

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computational Diffusion MRI (MICCAI 2019)

Abstract

In the present work, we use information theory to understand the empirical convergence rate of tractography, a widely-used approach to reconstruct anatomical fiber pathways in the living brain. Based on diffusion MRI data, tractography is the starting point for many methods to study brain connectivity. Of the available methods to perform tractography, most reconstruct a finite set of streamlines, or 3D curves, representing probable connections between anatomical regions, yet relatively little is known about how the sampling of this set of streamlines affects downstream results, and how exhaustive the sampling should be. Here we provide a method to measure the information theoretic surprise (self-cross entropy) for tract sampling schema. We then empirically assess four streamline methods. We demonstrate that the relative information gain is very low after a moderate number of streamlines have been generated for each tested method. The results give rise to several guidelines for optimal sampling in brain connectivity analyses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    It is important to distinguish between white matter fibers (fascicles) and observed “tracts.” In this paper we use “tracts” to denote the 3D-curves recovered from diffusion-weighted imaging via tractography algorithms.

  2. 2.

    The largest study to date aims to have 100,000 subjects participating in the imaging cohort [15]. By our back-of-the-envelope estimate, 100,000 subjects with 10,000,000 tracts each would require about 1.5 petabytes of disk space, just for the tractograms.

  3. 3.

    In short, we are asserting that \(\hat{P}\) converges as the number of samples used to construct it increases. This does not guarantee that \(\hat{P}\) converges to P.

  4. 4.

    Please contact the authors to access the code.

  5. 5.

    The definition of complete noise is actually tricky, but we could use a proxy of “drawing a tract length uniformly at random between 1 and the number of voxels, and filling its sequence with points drawn uniformly from the domain of the image”.

References

  1. Aganj, I., et al.: Reconstruction of the orientation distribution function in single-and multiple-shell q-ball imaging within constant solid angle. Magn. Reson. Med. 64(2), 554–566 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Behrens, T.E., et al.: Probabilistic diffusion tractography with multiple fibre orientations: what can we gain? Neuroimage 34(1), 144–155 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cheng, H., et al.: Optimization of seed density in dti tractography for structural networks. J. Neurosci. Methods 203(1), 264–272 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Coifman, R.R., Lafon, S.: Diffusion maps. Appl. Comput. Harmon. Anal. 21(1), 5–30 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Cover, T.M., Thomas, J.A.: Elements of Information Theory. Wiley (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fischl, B.: Freesurfer. NeuroImage 2(62), 774–781 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Garyfallidis, E.: Towards an accurate brain tractography. Ph.D. thesis University of Cambridge (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Garyfallidis, E., et al.: Quickbundles, a method for tractography simplification. Front. Neurosci. 6, 175 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Garyfallidis, E., et al.: Dipy, a library for the analysis of diffusion MRI data. Front. Neuroinform. 8(8) (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Garyfallidis, E., et al.: Recognition of white matter bundles using local and global streamline-based registration and clustering. NeuroImage (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Girard, G., et al.: Towards quantitative connectivity analysis: reducing tractography biases. Neuroimage 98, 266–278 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Jordan, K.M., et al.: Cluster confidence index: a streamline-wise pathway reproducibility metric for diffusion-weighted mri tractography. J. Neuroimaging 28(1), 64–69 (2018)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Le Bihan, D., et al.: Diffusion tensor imaging: concepts and applications. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 13(4), 534–546 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Maier-Hein, K.H., et al.: The challenge of mapping the human connectome based on diffusion tractography. Nat. Commun. 8(1), 1349 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Miller, K.L., et al.: Multimodal population brain imaging in the UK Biobank prospective epidemiological study. Nat. Neurosci. 19(11), 1523 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. O’Donnell, L.J., Westin, C.F.: Automatic tractography segmentation using a high-dimensional white matter atlas. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 26(11) (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Prasad, G., Nir, T.M., Toga, A.W., Thompson, P.M.: Tractography density and network measures in alzheimer’s disease. In: 2013 IEEE 10th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI), pp. 692–695. IEEE (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Smith, R.E., et al.: SIFT2: enabling dense quantitative assessment of brain white matter connectivity using streamlines tractography. Neuroimage 119 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sotiropoulos, S.N., Zalesky, A.: Building connectomes using diffusion MRI: why, how and but. NMR Biomed. (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Thomas, C., et al.: Anatomical accuracy of brain connections derived from diffusion mri tractography is inherently limited. PNAS 111(46), 16574–16579 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Tournier, J.D., et al.: Resolving crossing fibres using constrained spherical deconvolution: validation using diffusion-weighted imaging phantom data. NeuroImage 42(2), 617–625 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Van Essen, D.C., et al.: The WU-Minn human connectome project: an overview. NeuroImage 80, 62–79 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Wassermann, D., et al.: Unsupervised white matter fiber clustering and tract probability map generation: applications of a gaussian process framework for white matter fibers. NeuroImage 51(1), 228–241 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhang, Y., Brady, M., Smith, S.: Segmentation of brain MR images through a hidden Markov random field model and the expectation-maximization algorithm. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 20(1), 45–57 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by NIH Grant U54 EB020403 and DARPA grant W911NF-16-1-0575, as well as the NSF Graduate Research Fellowship Program Grant Number DGE-1418060.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul Thompson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Moyer, D.C., Thompson, P., Steeg, G.V. (2019). Measures of Tractography Convergence. In: Bonet-Carne, E., Grussu, F., Ning, L., Sepehrband, F., Tax, C. (eds) Computational Diffusion MRI. MICCAI 2019. Mathematics and Visualization. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05831-9_23

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics