Abstract
In the present work, we use information theory to understand the empirical convergence rate of tractography, a widely-used approach to reconstruct anatomical fiber pathways in the living brain. Based on diffusion MRI data, tractography is the starting point for many methods to study brain connectivity. Of the available methods to perform tractography, most reconstruct a finite set of streamlines, or 3D curves, representing probable connections between anatomical regions, yet relatively little is known about how the sampling of this set of streamlines affects downstream results, and how exhaustive the sampling should be. Here we provide a method to measure the information theoretic surprise (self-cross entropy) for tract sampling schema. We then empirically assess four streamline methods. We demonstrate that the relative information gain is very low after a moderate number of streamlines have been generated for each tested method. The results give rise to several guidelines for optimal sampling in brain connectivity analyses.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
It is important to distinguish between white matter fibers (fascicles) and observed “tracts.” In this paper we use “tracts” to denote the 3D-curves recovered from diffusion-weighted imaging via tractography algorithms.
- 2.
The largest study to date aims to have 100,000 subjects participating in the imaging cohort [15]. By our back-of-the-envelope estimate, 100,000 subjects with 10,000,000 tracts each would require about 1.5 petabytes of disk space, just for the tractograms.
- 3.
In short, we are asserting that \(\hat{P}\) converges as the number of samples used to construct it increases. This does not guarantee that \(\hat{P}\) converges to P.
- 4.
Please contact the authors to access the code.
- 5.
The definition of complete noise is actually tricky, but we could use a proxy of “drawing a tract length uniformly at random between 1 and the number of voxels, and filling its sequence with points drawn uniformly from the domain of the image”.
References
Aganj, I., et al.: Reconstruction of the orientation distribution function in single-and multiple-shell q-ball imaging within constant solid angle. Magn. Reson. Med. 64(2), 554–566 (2010)
Behrens, T.E., et al.: Probabilistic diffusion tractography with multiple fibre orientations: what can we gain? Neuroimage 34(1), 144–155 (2007)
Cheng, H., et al.: Optimization of seed density in dti tractography for structural networks. J. Neurosci. Methods 203(1), 264–272 (2012)
Coifman, R.R., Lafon, S.: Diffusion maps. Appl. Comput. Harmon. Anal. 21(1), 5–30 (2006)
Cover, T.M., Thomas, J.A.: Elements of Information Theory. Wiley (2012)
Fischl, B.: Freesurfer. NeuroImage 2(62), 774–781 (2012)
Garyfallidis, E.: Towards an accurate brain tractography. Ph.D. thesis University of Cambridge (2013)
Garyfallidis, E., et al.: Quickbundles, a method for tractography simplification. Front. Neurosci. 6, 175 (2012)
Garyfallidis, E., et al.: Dipy, a library for the analysis of diffusion MRI data. Front. Neuroinform. 8(8) (2014)
Garyfallidis, E., et al.: Recognition of white matter bundles using local and global streamline-based registration and clustering. NeuroImage (2017)
Girard, G., et al.: Towards quantitative connectivity analysis: reducing tractography biases. Neuroimage 98, 266–278 (2014)
Jordan, K.M., et al.: Cluster confidence index: a streamline-wise pathway reproducibility metric for diffusion-weighted mri tractography. J. Neuroimaging 28(1), 64–69 (2018)
Le Bihan, D., et al.: Diffusion tensor imaging: concepts and applications. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 13(4), 534–546 (2001)
Maier-Hein, K.H., et al.: The challenge of mapping the human connectome based on diffusion tractography. Nat. Commun. 8(1), 1349 (2017)
Miller, K.L., et al.: Multimodal population brain imaging in the UK Biobank prospective epidemiological study. Nat. Neurosci. 19(11), 1523 (2016)
O’Donnell, L.J., Westin, C.F.: Automatic tractography segmentation using a high-dimensional white matter atlas. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 26(11) (2007)
Prasad, G., Nir, T.M., Toga, A.W., Thompson, P.M.: Tractography density and network measures in alzheimer’s disease. In: 2013 IEEE 10th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI), pp. 692–695. IEEE (2013)
Smith, R.E., et al.: SIFT2: enabling dense quantitative assessment of brain white matter connectivity using streamlines tractography. Neuroimage 119 (2015)
Sotiropoulos, S.N., Zalesky, A.: Building connectomes using diffusion MRI: why, how and but. NMR Biomed. (2017)
Thomas, C., et al.: Anatomical accuracy of brain connections derived from diffusion mri tractography is inherently limited. PNAS 111(46), 16574–16579 (2014)
Tournier, J.D., et al.: Resolving crossing fibres using constrained spherical deconvolution: validation using diffusion-weighted imaging phantom data. NeuroImage 42(2), 617–625 (2008)
Van Essen, D.C., et al.: The WU-Minn human connectome project: an overview. NeuroImage 80, 62–79 (2013)
Wassermann, D., et al.: Unsupervised white matter fiber clustering and tract probability map generation: applications of a gaussian process framework for white matter fibers. NeuroImage 51(1), 228–241 (2010)
Zhang, Y., Brady, M., Smith, S.: Segmentation of brain MR images through a hidden Markov random field model and the expectation-maximization algorithm. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 20(1), 45–57 (2001)
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by NIH Grant U54 EB020403 and DARPA grant W911NF-16-1-0575, as well as the NSF Graduate Research Fellowship Program Grant Number DGE-1418060.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Moyer, D.C., Thompson, P., Steeg, G.V. (2019). Measures of Tractography Convergence. In: Bonet-Carne, E., Grussu, F., Ning, L., Sepehrband, F., Tax, C. (eds) Computational Diffusion MRI. MICCAI 2019. Mathematics and Visualization. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05831-9_23
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05831-9_23
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-05830-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-05831-9
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)