Skip to main content

Conclusions

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Case Against Bureaucratic Discretion
  • 261 Accesses

Abstract

The issue of accountability remains at the core of democratic governments. Voting is meaningless if elected officials are unable to control the actions and general behavior of public sector agents who, at times, appear to act with impunity according to their own sets of norms and objectives. The chapter revisits the threat to democracy posed by insulated bureaucratic organizations that operate at the local, national, and international levels. Exposure by legislative institutions or the media represents possible checks on abusive behavior; however, the chapter notes that those who step forward to expose wrongdoing often place themselves at risk. The chapter explores approaches to reining in strong organizations such as whistleblowing, external oversight, and internal oversight. Finally, the existential question of the extent to which insular bureaucracies endanger democracy is posed. The limitations of average voters are well recognized. However, the final call is to strengthen democracy through better communication, greater candidness, and trust in the ability of the people to reverse course when it appears that the train of government has gone seriously off the tracks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anderson, M. (2013). As the Trayvon Martin case goes to trial, remembering a major media event. Pew Research Center. Retrieved August 20, 2015, from http://www.pewresearch.org/

  • Andrzejewski, A. (2015, May 24). The VA scandal one year later. Forbes. Retrieved October 8, 2018, from https://www.forbes.com/

  • Dahl, J. (2013, July 12). Trayvon Martin shooting: A timeline of events. CBS News. Retrieved October 9, 2018, from https://www.cbsnews.com/

  • Follman, M., & Clark-Flory, T. (2006, March 14). Prosecutions and convictions. Salon. Retrieved October 9, 2018, from https://www.salon.com/

  • Grynbaum, M. M. (2017, February 17). Trump calls the news media the ‘Enemy of the American People.’ New York Times. Retrieved October 9, 2018, from https://www.nytimes.com

  • McGrath, R. J. (2013). Congressional oversight hearings and policy control. Legislative Studies Quarterly, XXXVIII(3), 349–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niskanen, W. (1971 [1994]). Bureaucracy and public economics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olmsted, K. (2018). Terror Tuesday: How Obama refined Bush’s counterterrorism policies. In J. E. Zelizer (Ed.), The presidency of Barack Obama (pp. 212–226). Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Riley, D. R. (1987). Controlling the federal bureaucracy. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scher, S. (1963). Conditions for legislative control. Journal of Politics, 25(3), 526–551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephens, B. (2017, February 26). Don’t dismiss president Trump’s attacks on the media as mere stupidity. Time. Retrieved October 9, 2018, from https://time.com/

  • Svara, J. (2015). The ethics primer for public administrator in government and nonprofit organizations. Burlington: Jones & Bartlett Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, D. (2014, May 31). The doctor who launched the VA scandal. AZCentral. Retrieved October 8, 2018, from https://www.azcentral.com/

  • White, L. D. (1945). Congressional control of the public service. American Political Science Review, XXXIX(1), 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, W. (1885). Congressional government. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steven G. Koven .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Koven, S.G. (2019). Conclusions. In: The Case Against Bureaucratic Discretion. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05779-4_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics