Skip to main content

Checks on Bureaucracy, Organizational Accountability, and Organizational Culture

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Case Against Bureaucratic Discretion
  • 313 Accesses

Abstract

Bureaucracies are not runaway trains. In and of themselves they are not destined to capture power from an inattentive public; they are not preordained to rule by virtue of their superior knowledge and expertise. There are very specific mechanisms to control potential excesses of the nonelected bureaucrats. This chapter describes checks on the power of the bureaucracy. The “inner check” relies upon a sense of professionalism, moral responsibility, and personal resolve as a control. The “outer check” in contrast adapts a less optimistic view of human motivations. The “outer check” requires obedience to external controlling authorities. For the outer check to be effective, external punitive controls are essential. Wrongdoing is likely to occur in the absence of such controls. Institutions enact controls on bureaucracies. These institutions include the three branches of government (executive, legislative, and judicial) as well as the media. Strong institutions prevent illegal capture of governance by bureaucratic actors. The chapter notes that it is difficult to discuss actions that can universally apply to all government organizations because government agencies differ dramatically in terms of their missions and culture. Bureaucracies retain discretion, yet their power can be constrained by either internal or external controls.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bart, C. K. (1997, November–December). Sex, lies, and mission statements. Business Horizons, pp. 9–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, T. L. (1998). The responsible administrator (4th ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finer, H. (1936). Better government personnel. Political Science Quarterly, 51(4), 569–599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finer, H. (1941). Administrative responsibility in democratic government. Public Administration Review, 1(4), 335–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedrich, C. J. (1935). Problems of the American public service. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedrich, C. J. (1940 [1972]). Public policy and the nature of administrative responsibility. In F. Rourke (Ed.), Bureaucratic power in national politics (2nd ed.). Boston: Little, Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrett, R. S., Thurber, A., Fritschler, A., & Rosenbloom, D. (2006). Assessing the impact of bureaucracy bashing by electoral campaigns. Public Administration Review, 66(2), 228–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaus, J. M. (1936). The responsibility of public administrators. In J. M. Gaus, I. D. White, & M. Dimock (Eds.), The frontiers of public administration (pp. 26–44). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodsell, C. T. (2011). Mission mystique: Belief systems in public agencies. Washington, DC: CQ Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gruber, J. E. (1987). Controlling bureaucracies. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halperin, M., Clapp, P., & Kanter, A. (2006). Bureaucratic politics and foreign policy (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: Brookings Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, M. (2009). Responsibility versus accountability in the Friedrich-Finer debate. Journal of Management History, 15(1), 66–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, H. (2006). The forest ranger: A study in administrative behavior (Special reprint ed.). Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koven, S. G. (2008). Responsible governance: A case study approach. Armonk: M.E. Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koven, S. G. (2015). Public sector ethics: Theory and applications. Boca Raton: CRC Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lowi, T. (1969). The end of liberalism. New York: W.W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mark, M. (2015, November 6). Amid Kim Davis backlash, Kentucky Gov.-Elect Matt Bevin to remove clerks’ names from state marriage licenses. International Business Times. Retrieved May 21, 2018, from http://www.ibtimes.com/

  • McCoy, A. W. (2006). A question of torture: CIA interrogation, from the cold war to the war on terror. New York: Henry Holt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meier, K. (1993). Politics and the bureaucracy (3rd ed.). Belmont: Wadsworth Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meier, K., & O’Toole, L. (2006). Bureaucracy in a democratic state. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfiffner, J. P. (2001). Presidential appointments: Recruiting executive branch leaders. In G. C. Mackenzie (Ed.), Innocent until nominated: The breakdown of the presidential appointments process (pp. 50–80). Washington, DC: Brookings Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfiffner, J. P. (2013). The paradox of President Reagan’s leadership. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 43(1), 81–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schein, E. (2004). Organizational culture and leadership (3rd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schubert, G. (1960). The public interest. Glencoe: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, V. (1975). Without sympathy or enthusiasm: The problem of administrative compassion. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Department of State. (n.d.). The oversight powers of Congress. Retrieved May 28, 2018, from http://countrystudies.us/united-states/government-14.htm

  • Weisman, S. (1983, October 10). Watt quits post; President accepts with ‘reluctance.’ New York Times, p. A1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J. Q. (1989). Bureaucracy. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steven G. Koven .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Koven, S.G. (2019). Checks on Bureaucracy, Organizational Accountability, and Organizational Culture. In: The Case Against Bureaucratic Discretion. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05779-4_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics