Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

What Do Design Reviewers Really Do? Understanding Roles Played by Design Reviewers in Daily Practice pp 123–145Cite as

Theoretical Underpinnings of the Four Hypothesized Roles

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

  • 141 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter investigates what accomplishments and lessons from pertinent literature can tell us about the implications of interview and survey results with respect to design reviewers’ hypothesized roles. Although developing a coherent formal theory of these roles is not a central goal of this book, the chapter explores the theoretical underpinnings that support the roles’ underlying ideas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Arnett, R. C. (1986). Communication and community: Implications of Martin Buber’s dialogue. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balachandra, L., Barrett, F., Bellman, H., Fisher, C., & Susskind, L. (2005, October). Improvisation and mediation: Balancing acts. Negotiation Journal, 21(4), 425-434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barton, H. (2005, Winter). A health map for urban planners: Towards a conceptual model for healthy, sustainable settlements. Built Environment, 31(4), 339–355. Retrieved April 1, 2009 from ATypon Link.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baum, H. (1997). The organization of hope. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blakely, E. J., Sharpe, S. M., Mandelbaum, S. J., Brooks, M. P., McClendon, B. W., & Meck, S. (1993). Planners, heal thyselves: Planning education, educators, and practitioners in the next century. Journal of the American Planning Association, 59(2), 139–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowers, J. (2007). Citizen education and its effects on trust in municipal government, political participation, and perceived knowledge of municipal government.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brody, S. D., Godschalk, D. R., & Burby, R. J. (2003). Mandating citizen participation in plan making: Six strategic planning choices. Journal of the American Planning Association, 69(3), 245–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burroughs, W., Drews, D., & Hallman, W. (1991). Predicting personality from personal possessions: A handbook on ownership and property (F. W. Rudmin, Ed.). Corte Madera, CA: Select Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J. H., & Hepler, H. W. (1979). Dimensions of communication: Readings. Belmont: Wadsworth Publishing Company Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmona, M., Heath, T., Oc, T., & Tiesdell, S. (2007). The communication process. In M. Larice & E. Macdonald (Eds.), The urban design reader (pp. 479–489). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colosi, T. (1999). The role of the mediator. Negotiation: Readings, exercises, and cases (3rd ed., pp. 421–428). Boston, MA, US: Irwin/The McGraw-Hill Companies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day, C. (2003). Consensus design: Socially inclusive process. Oxford, Great Britain: Architectural Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Cremer, D., & Tyler, T. (2007, May). The effects of trust in authority and procedural fairness on cooperation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(3), 639–649.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faga, B. (2006). Designing public consensus. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairfield, K. & Allred, K. (2007, August). Skillful inquiry as a means to success in mixed-motive negotiation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 37(8), 1837–1855.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrin, D., Bligh, M., & Kohles, J. (2007, August). Can I trust you to trust me?: A theory of trust, monitoring, and cooperation in interpersonal and intergroup relationships. Group & Organization Management, 32(4), 465–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, A., Sonn, C., & Bishop, B. (2002). Psychological sense of community: Research, applications, and implications. New York, NY, US: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Forester, J. (1987). Planning in the face of conflict: Negotiation and mediation strategies in local land use regulation. American Planning Association Journal, 53(3), 303–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forester, J. (1999a). Challenges of mediation and deliberation in the design professions: Practice stories from Israel and Norway. Journal of Architectural Planning and Research, 16(2), 116–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forester, J. (1999b). The deliberative practioner: Encouraging participatory planning processes. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forester, J. (2009). Dealing with differences: Dramas of mediating public disputes. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsyth, A. (2001). Sexuality and space: Nonconformist populations and planning practice. Journal of planning literature, 15(3), 339–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia, A. (1991, December). Dispute resolution without disputing: How the interactional organization of mediation hearings minimizes argument. American Sociological Review, 56(6), 818–835.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gifford, R. (2007). Environmental psychology: Principles and practice. Colville, WA: Optimal books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Healey, P. (2006). Urban complexity and spatial strategies: Towards a relational planning for our times. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodges, M. (2006). Empathy, meta-attributions, judgment of conflict and preferences for negotiation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hovland, C. I., Janis, I. L., & Kelley, H. H. (1953). Communication and persuasion. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubbard, P. (1996). Conflicting interpretation of architecture: An empirical investigation. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 16(2), 75–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Innes, J. E. (1996). Planning through consensus building: A new view of the comprehensive planning ideal. Journal of the American Planning Association, 62(4), 460–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Innes, J. E., & Booher, D. E. (2010). Planning with complexity: An introduction to collaborative rationality for public policy. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Innes, J. E., & Gruber, J. (2005). Planning styles in conflict: The metropolitan transportation commission. Journal of the American Planning Association, 71(2), 177–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, H. (1999). Neighborhood planning: A guide for citizens and planners. Chicago, IL: Planners Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, M. (1990). Designing community participation special events that cross generational boundaries. Coming of age (pp. 120–128). Edmond, OK, US: Environmental Design Research Association. Retrieved November 9, 2007 from PsycINFO database.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellett, P. (2007). Conflict dialogue: Working with layers of meaning for productive relationships. Thousand Oaks, CA, US: Sage Publications Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klassen, W. W. (1990). Architecture and philosophy: Phenomenology, hermeneutics, deconstruction. Cebu City, Philippines: University of San Carlos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kopec, D. (2012). Environmental psychology for design. New York: Fairchild Publications Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krantz, R. S. (2004). Practicing creative democracy: Participatory neighborhood planning, community organizing, and pragmatist sociology in Madison, Wisconsin. Dissertation Abstracts International, A: The Humanities and Social Sciences, 64(8), 3096-A.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kusenbach, M. (2003). Street phenomenology: The go-along as ethnographic research tool. Ethnography, 4(3), 455–485. Retrieved April 22, 2009 from Sage database. https://doi.org/10.1177/146613810343007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landau, D., & Landau, S. (1997, December). Confidence-building measures in mediation. Mediation Quarterly, 15(2), 97–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langsdorf, L. (1997). Argument as inquiry in a postmodern context. Argumentation, 11(3), 315–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larice, M., & Macdonald, E. (Eds.). (2007). The urban design reader. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larice, M., & Macdonald, E. (Eds.). (2013). The urban design reader. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawhon, L. L. (2003, Summer). Planners’ perceptions of their role in socially responsive neighborhood design. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 20(2), 153–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malnar, J., & Vodvarka, F. (2004). Sensory design. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mead, G., Blumer, H., Lakoff, G., Johnson, M., Potter, J., & Wetherell, M. (2003). Section 2. Language and communication. Inner lives and social worlds: Readings in social psychology (pp. 50–78). New York, NY, US: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norberg-Shulz, C. (1980). Genius loci: Towards a phenomenology of architecture. New York: Rizzoli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. (1990). Love’s knowledge: Essays on literature and philosophy. New York: Oxford UP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pellegrinelli, S. (2002). Managing the interplay and tensions of consulting interventions: The consultant-client relationship as mediation and reconciliation. Journal of Management Development, 21(5), 343–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, K., & Kashima, Y. (2007, November). From social talk to social action: Shaping the social triad with emotion sharing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(5), 780–797.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porth, R. J. (2002, Fall). Access to opportunity: The biggest regional challenge. National Civic Review, 91(3), 257–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Retzinger, S., & Scheff, T. (2006). Emotion, alienation, and narratives in protracted conflict. The psychology of resolving global conflicts: From war to peace (Vol. 1): Nature vs. nurture (pp. 239–255). Westport, CT: Praeger Security International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, C. (2007, September). The necessary and sufficient conditions of therapeutic personality change. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 44(3), 240–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roseland, M. (2005). Toward sustainable communities. Gabriola Island, Canada: New Society Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandercock, L. (2003). Dreaming the sustainable city: Organizing hope, negotiating fear, mediating memory. In B Eckstein & J. Throgmorton (Eds.), Story and sustainability: Planning, practice, and possibility for American cities, Massachusetts (pp. 142–164). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanoff, H. (2000). Community participation methods in design and planning. New York, NY: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheer, B. C. (1994). Introduction: The debate on design review. In B. C. Scheer & W. F. E. Preiser (Eds.), Design review: Challenging urban aesthetic controls (pp. 1–10). New York: Chapman and Hall.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Scheer, B. C., & Preiser, W. F. E. (Eds.). (1994). Design review: Challenging urban aesthetic control. New York: Chapman & Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D. A. (1985). The design studio: An exploration of its traditions and potentials. International Specialized Book Service Incorporated.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner: Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, R. M. (2003). Becoming a facilitative leader: The path to positive outcomes can be counterintuitive. New York: Jossey Bass Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, R. M. (2009). The skilled facilitative leader: How to get results you didn’t think possible. New York: Jossey Bass Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seamon, D. (Ed.). (1993). Dwelling, seeing, and designing: Toward a phenomenological ecology. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Susskind, R., & Cruikshank, J. (2006). Breaking Robert’s rules: The new way to run your meeting, build consensus and get results. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Takahashi, L. M., & Gaber, S. L. (1998). Controversial facility siting in the urban environment: Resident and planner perceptions in the United States. Environment and Behavior, 30(2), 184–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T. (2001). Why do people rely on others? Social identity and social aspects of trust. Trust in society (pp. 285–306). New York, NY, US: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Architecture and Design, Lawrence Technological University, Southfield, MI, USA

    Joongsub Kim

Authors
  1. Joongsub Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joongsub Kim .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kim, J. (2019). Theoretical Underpinnings of the Four Hypothesized Roles. In: What Do Design Reviewers Really Do? Understanding Roles Played by Design Reviewers in Daily Practice. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05642-1_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation