Abstract
This chapter discusses the key results of the supplemental surveys conducted on design reviewers. Also highlighted are key trends and themes cutting across the survey outcomes. The findings are organized around the four hypothesized roles of design reviewers to investigate meaningful relationships between the survey results and the four roles, and in order to understand the implications of such connections.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Scheer, B. C. (1994). Introduction: The debate on design review. In B. C. Scheer & W. F. E. Preiser (Eds.), Design review: Challenging urban aesthetic controls (pp. 1–10). New York: Chapman and Hall.
Scheer, B. C., & Preiser, W. F. E. (Eds.). (1994). Design review: Challenging urban aesthetic control. New York: Chapman & Hall.
Scheer, B., & Preiser, W. (2012). Design review: Challenging urban aesthetic control. Springer Science & Business Media.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kim, J. (2019). Survey Results. In: What Do Design Reviewers Really Do? Understanding Roles Played by Design Reviewers in Daily Practice. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05642-1_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05642-1_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-05641-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-05642-1
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)