Skip to main content

How to Govern VSE Teams: Experiences Through a Model and Case Study

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Technology Trends (CITT 2018)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 895))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1093 Accesses

Abstract

The software development organizations need an understanding of the governance process and their practical approach to reach their strategic goals, a subject where there is a research opportunity. This study proposes a model type artifact to govern Very Small Entities (VSE) Teams for Software Development. The model design is based on COBIT 5 and IT governance best practices, with structural and dynamic governance components. The validation is done through the model application, in a case study, in a Public Sector Organization, using a SCRUM software process. The model application allows the appropriate responses to the software development needs and facilitate the solution of the problems in the project development. Besides, a survey shows that in a developing country, the model applicability can be generalizable. Thus, the study tests a tool for the practitioners and academics and contributes to the growth of the current knowledge concerning the Software Development Governance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Webb, P., Pollard, C., Ridley, G.: Attempting to define IT governance wisdom or folly?. In: 39th International Conference on System Sciences, Hawaii (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Van Grembergen, W., De Haes, S.: Enterprise Governance of Information Technology. Springer, New York (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-84882-2

    Google Scholar 

  3. Almeida, R., Pereira, R., Mira da Silva, M.: IT governance mechanisms: a literature review. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference IESS, Porto, Portugal, 7–8 February 2013

    Google Scholar 

  4. Castro, M., Hernandes, C.: A metric of software size as a tool for IT governance. In: Proceedings of 27th Brazilian Symposium on Software Engineering, SBES 2013 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dubinsky, Y., Ravid, S., Rafaeli, A., Bar-Nahor, R.: Governance mechanisms in global development environments. In: Sixth IEEE International Conference on Global Software Engineering (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  6. ISACA: COBIT 5.0. A business framework for governance and management of IT (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chulani, S., Williams, C., Yaeli, A.: Software development governance and its concerns. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Software Development Governance (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Sommer, A., Dukovska-Popovska, I., Steger-Jensen, K.: Agile product development governance – on governing the emerging scrum/stage-gate hybrids. In: Grabot, B., et al. (Eds.): APMS 2014, Part I, IFIP AICT (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Talby, D., Dubinsky, Y.: Governance of an agile software project. In: SDG 2009, Vancouver, Canada (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  10. O’Connor, R.V., Laporte, C.Y.: Software project management in very small entities with ISO/IEC 29110. In: Winkler, D., O’Connor, Rory V., Messnarz, R. (eds.) EuroSPI 2012. CCIS, vol. 301, pp. 330–341. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31199-4_29

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sánchez-Gordón, M.-L., Colomo-Palacios, R., de Amescua Seco, A., O’Connor, R.V.: The route to software process improvement in small- and medium-sized enterprises. Managing Software Process Evolution, pp. 109–136. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31545-4_7

    Google Scholar 

  12. Maglyas, A., Nikula, U., Smolander, K.: Comparison of software product management practices in SMEs and large enterprises. In: Cusumano, M.A., Iyer, B., Venkatraman, N. (eds.) ICSOB 2012. LNBIP, vol. 114, pp. 15–26. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30746-1_2

    Google Scholar 

  13. Van Wyk, L., Marnewick, C.: Applying governance principles to improve agile project success. In: International Association for Management of Technology IAMOT 2016 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Er, N., Erbaş, C., Ervaş, B.: Software development governance: a case study for tools integration. In: Modern Software Engineering Concepts and Practices: Advanced Approaches, Information Science Reference, pp. 315–332 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bannerman, P.: Software development governance: a meta-management perspective. In SDG 2009, Vancouver, Canada (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hevner, A., Ram, S., March, S., Park, J.: Design science in information systems research. MIS Q. 28(1), 75–105 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hevner, A., Chatterjee, S.: Design Research in Information Systems. Springer Publishing, New York (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-5653-8

    Google Scholar 

  18. Helfert, M., Donnellan, B. (eds.): EDSS 2011. CCIS, vol. 286. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33681-2

    Google Scholar 

  19. Peffers, K., Rothenberger, M., Kuechler, B. (eds.): DESRIST 2012. LNCS, vol. 7286. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29863-9

    Google Scholar 

  20. Tremblay, M.C., VanderMeer, D., Rothenberger, M., Gupta, A., Yoon, V. (eds.): DESRIST 2014. LNCS, vol. 8463. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06701-8

    Google Scholar 

  21. Given, L. (ed.): SAGE: The SAGE Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods. SAGE Publications, Los Angeles (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Mason, J.: Qualitative Researching. SAGE Publications, London (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  23. De Haes, S., Van Grembergen, W.: Information Technology Governance: Models, Practices, and Cases. IGI Publishing, Hershey (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  24. ISACA: COBIT 5: Enabling Processes (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Noll, J., Beecham, S., Richardson, I., Canna, C.: A global teaming model for global software development governance: a case study. In: IEEE 11th International Conference on Global Software Engineering (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kofman, A., Yaeli, A., Klinger, T., Tarr, P.: Roles, rights, and responsibilities: better governance through decision rights automation. In: SDG 2009 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  27. ISO IEC: ISO/IEC TR 29110-1 Systems and software engineering—Lifecycle profiles for Very Small Entities (VSEs) (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  28. SCRUMstudy™: A Guide to the Scrum Body of Knowledge (SBOK™ Guide), VMEdu, Inc. (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  29. SNAP-Ecuador: Subsecretaría de Gobierno Electrónico. http://www.administracionpublica.gob.ec/subsecretaria-de-gobierno-electronico/#. Accessed 2017

  30. AESOFT-Ecuador: AESOFT. http://aesoft.com.ec/. Accessed 2017

  31. Heal, R., Twycross, A.: Validity and reliability in quantitative research, Evid.-Based Nurs., 66–67 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Mangalaraj, G., Singh, A.: IT governance frameworks and COBIT - a literature review. In: Twentieth Americas Conference on Information Systems, Savannah (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Bartens, Y., De Haes, S., Lamoen, Y., Schulte, F., Voss, S.: On the way to a minimum baseline in IT governance: using expert views for selective implementation of COBIT 5. In: 48th Hawaii International Conference on System Science (2015)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carlos Montenegro .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix A: SCRUM Management Model (SPM_SCRUM)

Appendix A: SCRUM Management Model (SPM_SCRUM)

The model has three-phase execution, based on the best practices (See Fig. 5). The first phase refers to the initial conceptualization of the software development process in which the goal is to understand the problem that is being proposed, to suggest the solution jointly with the business owner, based on a clear understanding of the requirements of the problem and agreed metrics for product evaluation. The second phase corresponds to the iterative process that allows the construction of the software through increments or partial deliveries of functional software. The third stage refers to the control and monitoring of the software development project.

Fig. 5.
figure 5

SCRUM management model

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Arévalo, R., Montenegro, C. (2019). How to Govern VSE Teams: Experiences Through a Model and Case Study. In: Botto-Tobar, M., Pizarro, G., Zúñiga-Prieto, M., D’Armas, M., Zúñiga Sánchez, M. (eds) Technology Trends. CITT 2018. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 895. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05532-5_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05532-5_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-05531-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-05532-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics