Abstract
Although federalism is often conceptualized as a subcomponent of democracy, a considerable number of hybrid and authoritarian regimes feature federal structures as well. To explore this puzzle, the chapter discusses basic tensions with which ‘authoritarian federalism’ is faced: one arising from the defective rule of law, another one from restrictions of plurality, and, finally, from loyalty conflicts to which sub-federal incumbents are exposed. It is argued that similar tensions resulting from federal organization also occur in democracies, but authoritarian and democratic federations respond differently to these challenges. Moreover, the chapter reveals that even though federalism triggers uncertainty in authoritarian regimes, rulers at the central level profit from federal organization. Evidence is taken from the Russian case which can be understood as a ‘typical case’ in this respect.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bednar, J. (2009). The Robust Federation: Principles of Design. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Benz, A. (2013). Balancing Rigidity and Flexibility: Constitutional Change in Federal Systems. West European Politics, 36(4), 726–749.
Benz, A. (2015). Making Democracy Work in a Federal System. German Politics, 24(1), 8–25.
Benz, A., & Kropp, S. (2014). Föderalismus in Demokratien und Autokratien – Vereinbarkeiten, Spannungsfelder und Dynamiken. Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft. Comparative Governance and Politics, 8, 1–27.
Benz, A., & Sonnicksen, J. (2017). Patterns of Federal Democracy: Tensions, Friction, or Balance Between Two Government Dimensions. European Political Science Review, 9(1), 3–25.
Bouwen, P. (2004). Exchange Access Good for Access: A Comparative Study of Business Lobbying in the EU Institutions. European Journal of Political Research, 43(3), 337–369.
Buckley, N., & Reuter, O. J. (2018). Performance Incentives Under Autocracy: Evidence from Russia’s Regions. Comparative Politics.
Burgess, M. (2006). Comparative Federalism: Theory and Practice. Abingdon: Routledge.
Dahl, R. A. (1973). Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Filippov, M., & Shvetsova, O. (2013). Federalism, Democracy, and Democratization. In A. Benz & J. Broschek (Eds.), Federal Dynamics (pp. 167–184). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fraenkel, E. (2001). Der Doppelstaat. Hamburg: Europäische Verlagsanstalt.
Gel’man, V. (2010). The Dynamics of Sub-National Authoritarianism: Russia in Comparative Perspective. In V. Gel’man & C. Ross (Eds.), The Politics of Sub-National Authoritarianism in Russia (pp. 1–18). Farnham: Ashgate.
Gel’man, V., & Ryzhenkov, S. (2011). Local Regimes, Sub-National Governance and the ‘Power Vertical’ in Contemporary Russia. Europe-Asia Studies, 63, 449–465.
Gibson, E. L. (2013). Boundary Control: Subnational Authoritarianism in Federal Democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Golosov, G. V. (2011). The Regional Roots of Electoral Authoritarianism in Russia. Europe-Asia Studies, 63, 623–639.
Goode, P. J. (2013). The Revival of Russia’s Gubernatorial Elections: Liberalization or Potemkin Reform? Russian Analytical Digest, 2013(139), 9–11.
Hale, H. E. (2011a). Hybrid Regimes—When Autocracy and Democracy Mix. In N. J. Brown (Ed.), Dynamics of Democratization: Dictatorship, Development, and Diffusion (pp. 23–45). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University.
Hale, H. E. (2011b). Formal Constitutions in Informal Politics: Institutions and Democratization in Post-Soviet Eurasia. World Politics, 63(4), 581–617.
Hale, H. E. (2015). Patronal Politics: Eurasian Regime Dynamics in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hamilton, A., Madison, J., & Jay, J. (1989). The Federalist Papers. New York: Bantam.
Helmke, G., & Levitsky, S. (2004). Informal Institutions and Comparative Politics: A Research Agenda. Perspectives on Politics, 2, 725–740.
Holmes, L. (2012). Corruption in Post-Soviet Russia. Global Change, Peace & Security, 24(2), 235–250.
Kailitz, S. (2013). Classifying Political Regimes Revisited: Legitimation and Durability. Democratization, 20(1), 39–60.
Kropp, S. (2015). Federalism, People’s Legislation, and Associative Democracy. In C. Fraenkel-Haeberle, S. Kropp, F. Palermo, & K.-P. Sommermann (Eds.), Citizen Participation in Multilevel Democracies (pp. 48–66). Leiden and Boston: Brill.
Kropp, S., & Aasland, A. (2018). Patterns of Governance in Russia—Feedback of Empirical Findings into Governance Theory. In S. Kropp, A. Aasland, M. Berg-Nordlie, J. Holm-Hansen, & J. Schuhmann (Eds.), Governance in Russian Regions: A Policy Comparison (pp. 219–245). Houndmills and Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Lane, J.-E., & Ersson, S. (2005). The Riddle of Federalism: Does Federalism Impact on Democracy? Democratization, 12, 163–182.
Lauth, H.-J. (2000). Informal Institutions and Democracy. Democratization, 7(4), 21–50.
Levitsky, S., & Way, L. A. (2010). Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes After the Cold War. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Lorenz, A. (2010). Verfassungsänderungen in föderalen und unitarischen Demokratien im Vergleich. Befunde einer empirischen Analyse für den Zeitraum von 1945 bis 2004. In J. von Blumenthal & J. Bröchler (Eds.), Föderalismusreform in Deutschland. Bilanz und Perspektiven im internationalen Vergleich (pp. 13–36). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.
Melville, A., Stukal, D., & Mironiuk, M. (2014). ‘King of the Mountain’ or Why Postcommunist Autocracies Have Bad Institutions. Russian Politics & Law, 52, 7–29.
Obydenkova, A., & Swenden, W. (2013). Autocracy-Sustaining Versus Democratic Federalism: Explaining the Divergent Trajectories of Territorial Politics in Russia and Western Europe. Territory, Politics, Governance, 1(1), 86–112.
O’Donnell, G., & Schmitter, P. (1986). Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Tentative Conclusions About Uncertain Democracies. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Panov, P., & Ross, C. (2016). Levels of Centralisation and Autonomy in Russia’s ‘Party of Power’: Cross-Regional Variations. Europe-Asia Studies, 68, 232–252.
Reuter, O. J. (2010). The Politics of Dominant Party Formation: United Russia and Russia’s Governors. Europe-Asia Studies, 62, 293–327.
Reuter, O. J., & Remington, T. F. (2009). Dominant Party Regimes and the Commitment Problem: The Case of United Russia. Comparative Political Studies, 42, 501–526.
Riker, W. (1964). Federalism: Origin, Operation, Significance. Boston: Little Brown.
Ross, C. (2009). Local Politics and Democratization in Russia. London and New York: Routledge.
Sakwa, R. (2010). The Dual State in Russia. Post-Soviet Affairs, 26(3), 185–206.
Schedler, A., & Hoffmann, B. (2016). Communicating Authoritarian Elite Cohesion. Democratization, 23(1), 93–117.
Sharafutdinova, G. (2009). Subnational Governance in Russia: How Putin Changed the Contract with His Agents and the Problems It Created for Medvedev. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 40, 672–696.
Smyth, R., Lowry, A., & Wilkening, B. (2007). Engineering Victory: Institutional Reform, Informal Institutions, and the Formation of a Hegemonic Party Regime in the Russian Federation. Post-Soviet Affairs, 23, 118–137.
Solnick, S. L. (1996). The Political Economy of Russian Federalism: A Framework for Analysis. Problems of Post-Communism, 29, 13–25.
Starodubtsev, A. (2018). Federalism and Regional Policy in Contemporary Russia. Abingdon: Routledge.
Stepan, A. (1999). Federalism and Democracy: Beyond the U.S. Model. Journal of Democracy, 10(4), 19–34.
Stoliarov, M. (2003). Federalism and the Dictatorship in Russia. New York: Routledge.
Svolik, M. W. (2012). The Politics of Authoritarian Rule. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Toubeau, S., & Massetti, E. (2013). The Party Politics of Territorial Reforms in Europe. West European Politics, 36(2), 297–316.
Treisman, D. (2007). The Architecture of Government: Rethinking Political Decentralization. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
Wintrobe, R. (2009). Dictatorship: Analytical Approaches. In C. Boix & S. C. Stokes (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Politics (pp. 363–394). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wurster, S., Kropp, S., & Dukalskis, A. (2017, September). Regional Competition in Hybrid and Authoritarian Regimes. Paper Presented at the ECPR General Conference, Oslo.
Zubarevich, N. (2014). Monitoring krizisa i postkrizisnogo razvitiya regionov Rossii. http://www.socpol.ru/atlas/overviews/social_sphere/kris.shtml.
Zubarevich, N. (2016). Bad But Stable. Russian Politics & Law, 54, 365–373.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kropp, S. (2019). The Ambivalence of Federalism and Democracy: The Challenging Case of Authoritarianism—With Evidence from the Russian Case. In: Behnke, N., Broschek, J., Sonnicksen, J. (eds) Configurations, Dynamics and Mechanisms of Multilevel Governance. Comparative Territorial Politics. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05511-0_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05511-0_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-05510-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-05511-0
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)