Skip to main content

Complex Interbank Network Estimation: Sparsity-Clustering Threshold

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Complex Networks and Their Applications VII (COMPLEX NETWORKS 2018)

Part of the book series: Studies in Computational Intelligence ((SCI,volume 813))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 2499 Accesses

Abstract

In the “too-interconnected-to-fail” discussion network theory has emerged as an important tool to identify risk concentrations in interbank networks. Therefore, however, data on bilateral bank exposures, i.e. the edges in such a network, is not available but has to be estimated. In this work we report on the possibility of enhancing existing inference techniques with prior knowledge on network topology in order to preserve complex interbank network characteristics. A convenient feature of our technique is that a single parameter \(\alpha \) governs the characteristics of the resulting network. In an empirical study we reconstruct the network of about 2100 US commercial banks and show that complex network characteristics can indeed be preserved and, moreover, controlled by \(\alpha \). In an outlook we discuss the possibility of developing an \(\alpha \)-based measurement for the complexity characteristics of observed interbank networks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The FFIEC Central Data Repository’s Public Data Distribution can be accessed and call reports downloaded here https://cdr.ffiec.gov/public/.

  2. 2.

    The reason for not including banks with reported total assets less than USD 300 millions (for those institutions not maintaining foreign offices) is that these banks are released from reporting certain details on their interbank-business (as well as other details) which are needed in this analysis in order to construct the interbank network though.

  3. 3.

    These are the banks that build the nodes N in our graph.

References

  1. Affinito, M.: Do interbank customer relationships exist? and how did they function in the crisis? Learning from italy. J. Bank. Financ. 36(12), 3163–3184 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Affinito, M., Pozzolo, A.F.: The interbank network across the global financial crisis: evidence from italy. J. Bank. Financ. 80, 90–107 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Albert, R., Barabasi, A.L.: Statistical mechanics of complex networks. Rev. Mod. Phys. 74(1), 47–97 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Anand, K., Craig, B., Peter, G.V.: Filling in the blanks: network structure and interbank contagion. Quant. Financ. 15(4), 625–636 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Battiston, S., Caldarelli, G., Gurciullo, S.: Leveraging the network: a stress-test framework based on DebtRank. Stat. Risk Model. 33(3–4), 117–138 (2016)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Bech, M.L., Atalay, E.: The topology of the federal funds market. Phys. A: Stat. Mech. Its Appl. 389(22), 5223–5246 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Boss, M., Elsinger, H., Summer, M., Thurner, S.: Network topology of the interbank market. Quant. Financ. 4(6), 677–684 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cocco, J.F., Gomes, F.J., Martins, N.C.: Lending relationships in the interbank market. J. Financ. Intermediation 18(1), 24–48 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cont, R., Moussa, A., Santos, E.B.: Network structure and systemic risk in banking systems. Handbook on Systemic Risk, pp. 327–368 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Degryse, H., Nguyen, G.: Interbank exposures: an empirical examination of systemic risk in the belgian banking system. Int. J. Central Bank. 3(2), 123–171 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Degryse, H., Ongena, S.: Distance, lending relationships, and competition. Am. Financ. Assoc. 60(1), 231–266 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Eisenberg, L., Noe, T.: Systemic risk in financial systems. Manag. Sci. 47(2), 236–249 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Fruchterman, T., Reingold, E.: Graph drawing by force directed placement. Softw.: Pract. Exp. 21(NOVEMBER), 1129–1164 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Furfine, C.H.: Interbank exposures: quantifying the risk of contagion. J. Money Credit Bank. 35(1), 111–128 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gofman, M.: Efficiency and stability of a financial architecture with too-interconnected-to-fail institutions. J. Financ. Econ. 124(1), 113–146 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Greenwood, R., Landier, A., Thesmar, D.: Vulnerable banks. J. Financ. Econ. 115(3), 471–485 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Inaoka, H., Ninomiya, T., Shimizu, T., Takayasu, H., Taniguchi, K.: In: 04-E-04. James, K pages, (ed.), pp. 1–22(2004)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lehmann, E., Neuberger, D.: Do lending relationships matter? Evidence from bank survey data in Germany. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 45(4), 339–359 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lelyveld, I.V., Liedorp, F.: Interbank contagion in the dutch banking sector: a sensitivity analysis. Int. J. Central Bank. 2, 99–133 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Markose, S., Giansante, S., Shaghaghi, A.R.: ‘Too interconnected to fail’ financial network of US CDS market: topological fragility and systemic risk. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 83(3), 627–646 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Mistrulli, P.E.: Assessing financial contagion in the interbank market: maximum entropy versus observed interbank lending patterns. J. Bank. Financ. 35(5), 1114–1127 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Müller, J.: Interbank credit lines as a channel of contagion. J. Financ. Serv. Res. 29(2000), 37–60 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Rørdam, K.B., Bech, M.L.: The topology of Danish interbank money flows. Banks Bank Syst. 4(4), 48–65 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Soramäki, K., Bech, M.L., Arnold, J., Glass, R.J., Beyeler, W.E.: The topology of interbank payment flows. Phys. A: Stat. Mech. Its Appl. 379(1), 317–333 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Upper, C.: Simulation methods to assess the danger of contagion in interbank markets. J. Financ. Stab. 7(3), 111–125 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Volcker, P.: Unfinished business in financial reform. Int. Financ. 15(1), 125–135 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Watts, D.J.J., Strogatz, S.H.H.: Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks. Nature 393(6684), 440–442 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nils Bundi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix

Appendix

In order to analyze the “goodness” of our estimation technique, we compute the error terms between observed total payment obligations and claims (i.e. target matrix margins) and the margins of the estimated adjacency matrix. Therefore, we present in Fig. 4 the sum of absolute errors relative to sum of total interbank payment obligations and claims (notice the log-scale). Hence, the graph shows the total (absolute) interbank payment obligations and claims that have not been correctly attributed to individual banks by our estimation technique as a percentage of total interbank value. Since for \(\alpha =1\) no interbank links are established the relative error is exactly one in this case. Interestingly, the estimation error remains on about the same level for \(0<\alpha <1\). This indicates that even though the number of established links is reduced drastically banks are still able to distribute their interbank assets among a set of sufficiently similar (with respect to our composite measure of similarity) counterparts.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Bundi, N., Khashanah, K. (2019). Complex Interbank Network Estimation: Sparsity-Clustering Threshold. In: Aiello, L., Cherifi, C., Cherifi, H., Lambiotte, R., Lió, P., Rocha, L. (eds) Complex Networks and Their Applications VII. COMPLEX NETWORKS 2018. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 813. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05414-4_39

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics