Abstract
We provide a new model of attributed networks where label of each vertex is a partition of integer n into at most m integer parts and all labels are different. The metric in the space of (n, m)-partitions is introduced. First, we investigate special class of the trinomial \((m^2, m)\)-partitions as a base for synthesis of networks G(m). It turns out that algorithmic complexity (the shortest computer program that produces G(m) upon halting) of these networks grows with m as \(\log m\) only. Numerical simulations of simple graphs for trinomial \((m^2, m)\)-partition families \((m= 3, 4, \ldots , 9)\) allows to estimate topological parameters of the graphs—clustering coefficients, cliques distribution, vertex degree distribution—and to show existence of such effects as scale-free and self-similarity for evolving networks. Since the model under consideration is completely deterministic, these results put forward new mode of thought about mechanisms of similarity, preferential attachment and popularity of complex networks. In addition, we obtained some numerical results relating robust behavior of the networks to disturbances like deleting nodes or cliques.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
There exist optimal algorithm and recurrent rules for exact computation of number of partitions in the classes P(n, m) [11].
- 2.
There is totipotency cell in living organisms, i.e. a single cell with the ability to divide and produce all of the differentiated cells in an organism.
- 3.
The closest analogy to low value for K-complexity is the problem of generating all partitions of n into at most m parts. An upper bound on K-complexity of the problem is \(\log n\) because the recurrence holds for all integers m and n but running time to generate all partitions grows exponentially with n [11].
- 4.
Perfect graph is a graph in which the chromatic number of every induced subgraph equals the size of the largest clique of that subgraph [16].
- 5.
J-distance \(d(A,B) = 1 - (A \cap B)/(A \cup B)\) is measure dissimilarity between two sets A and B (see [14]).
References
Andrews, G.E.: Number Theory (1971)
Andrews, G.E.: Euler’s “Exemplum memorabile inductionis fallacis" and q-trinomial coefficients. J. Am. Math. Soc. 3(3), 653–669 (1990). https://doi.org/10.2307/1990932
Barabási, A.L., Ravasz, E., Vicsek, T.: Deterministic scale-free networks. Physica A: Stat. Mech. Appl. 299(3–4), 559–564 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4371(01)00369-7
Bocharov, P.: Partition Games Research Toolbox (2015). https://github.com/pbo/partition-games
Bocharov, P., Goryashko, A.: Evolutionary dynamics of partition games. In: 2015 International Conference "Stability and Control Processes” in Memory of V.I. Zubov (SCP), pp. 225–228. IEEE (2015). https://doi.org/10.1109/SCP.2015.7342108. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7342108/
Bollobás, B.: Random graphs. In: Modern Graph Theory, pp. 215–252. Springer, New York (1998)
Bollobás, B., Riordan, O.M.: Mathematical results on scale-free random graphs. In: Handbook of Graphs and Networks (2004). https://doi.org/10.1002/3527602755.ch1
Chaitin, G.J.: On the length of programs for computing finite Binary Sequences: statistical considerations. J. ACM 13(4), 547–569 (1969). https://doi.org/10.1145/321495.321506
Cvetkovic, D., Rowlinson, P., Simic, S., Beineke, W., Godsil, C., Royle, G., Biggs, N., Doob, M., Wilson, R.J.: Algebraic Graph Theory (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-0163-9
Goryashko, A.: On suboptimal solution of antagonistic matrix games. ITM Web of Conferences, vol. 1(03001) (2017). https://doi.org/10.1051/itmconf/20171003001
Knuth, D.E.: The Art of Computer Programming, Combinatorial Algorithms, Part 1, vol. 4A. Addison-Wesley Professional (2011)
Kolmogorov, A.N.: Three approaches to the quantitative definition of information. Probl. Inf. Trans. 1(1), 1–7 (1965)
Leskovec, J., Chakrabarti, D., Kleinberg, J., Faloutsos, C., Ghahramani, Z.: Kronecker graphs: an approach to modeling networks. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 11, 985–1042 (2010)
Levandowsky, M., Winter, D.: Distance between sets. Nature 234(5323), 34 (1971)
Li, M., Vitányi, P.M.B.: Kolmogorov complexity and its applications. Centre for Mathematics and Computer Science (1989)
Lovász, L.: Perfect graphs. Sel. Top. Graph Theory 2, 55–87 (1983)
Morzy, M., Kajdanowicz, T., Kazienko, P.: On measuring the complexity of networks: kolmogorov complexity versus entropy. Complexity (2017)
Newman, M.E.J.: The structure and function of complex networks. SIAM Rev. 45(2), 167–256 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1137/S003614450342480
OEIS Foundation Inc.: The On-Line Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences (2018). https://oeis.org
Samokhine, L.: Trinomial Family Research Toolbox (2017). https://github.com/samokhine/gory
Tardos, E., Wexler, T.: Network Formation Games and the Potential Function Method (2007). https://doi.org/10.1145/1785414.1785439
Watts, D.J., Strogatz, S.H.: Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks. Nature 393(6684), 440 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1038/30918
Zenil, H., Kiani, N.A., Tegnér, J.: Low-algorithmic-complexity entropy-deceiving graphs. Phys. Rev. E (2017). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.96.012308
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Goryashko, A., Samokhine, L., Bocharov, P. (2019). New Deterministic Model of Evolving Trinomial Networks. In: Aiello, L., Cherifi, C., Cherifi, H., Lambiotte, R., Lió, P., Rocha, L. (eds) Complex Networks and Their Applications VII. COMPLEX NETWORKS 2018. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 812. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05411-3_45
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05411-3_45
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-05410-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-05411-3
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)