Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Studies in the Political Economy of Public Policy ((PEPP))

  • 215 Accesses

Abstract

Elites in Brazil and India responded to mass strikes with a turn to right-wing governments which could not prevent a new wave of strikes. The global conjuncture reveals limitations of the recent wave of mass strikes due to their relative isolation from other protest actors and their lack of broader political aspirations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Beverly Silver (2003) argues that the fusion of workers’ movements with broader political mobilisations in the cases of South Korea, Brazil and South Africa effectively raised the chances of success of labour unrest. It would be worthwhile to discuss to what extent the focus of these movements on authoritarian regimes, that is, the political level, weakened the class content of those mobilisations in the mid- and long-term perspective.

References

  • Althusser, L. (2006a). Contradiction and Overdetermination. In For Marx (pp. 49–93). London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Althusser, L. (2006b). Marx in His Limits. In The Philosophy of the Encounter (pp. 7–162). London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bond, P., & Mottiar, S. (2013). Movements, Protest and Massacre in South Africa. Journal of Contemporary African Studies, 31(2), 283–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braga, R., & Purdy, S. (2018). A Precarious Hegemony: Neo-liberalism, Social Struggles, and the End of Lulismo in Brazil. Globalizations. https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2018.1479013.

  • Crouch, C. (2010). The Strange Non-death of Neoliberalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DIEESE. (2015). Balanço das Greves em 2013, Estudos e pesquisas No. 79. São Paulo: DIEESE.

    Google Scholar 

  • DIEESE. (2017). Balanço das Greves de 2016. Estudos e pesquisas, 84. São Paulo: DIEESE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, P. K. (1986). Conflict at Work. A Materialist Analysis of Workplace Relations. Oxford: Basil-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Estanque, E. (2014). Rebeliões de classe média? Precariedade e movimentos sociais em Portugal e no Brasil (2011–2013). Revista Crítica de Ciências Sociais, 103, 53–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fearnside, P. (2016). Environmental and Social Impacts of Hydroelectric Dams in Brazilian Amazonia: Implications for the Aluminium Industry. World Development, 77, 48–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R. (1994). Repressive Labour Relations and New Unionism in East Asia. In P. B. Voos (Ed.), Proceedings of the Forty-Sixth Annual Meeting, Industrial Relations Research Association (pp. 231–238). Madison: Industrial Relations Research Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallas, A. (2017). Revisiting Conjunctural Marxism. Althusser and Poulantzas on the Capitalist State. Rethinking Marxism, 29(2), 256–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, S. (1980). Race and State in Capitalist Development: South Africa in Comparative Perspective. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, W. G. (1992). Our Precious Metal. African Labour in South Africa’s Gold Industry, 1970–1990. Claremont: David Philip Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knox, R. (2016). Law, Neoliberalism and the Constitution of Political Subjectivity: The Case of Organised Labour. In H. Brabazon (Ed.), Neoliberal Legality: Understanding the Role of Law in the Neoliberal Project (pp. 92–118). Oxford: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolin, A. (2016). Political Economy of Labor Repression in the United States. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwon, S., & O’Donnell, M. (1999). Repression and Struggle: The State, the Chaebol and Industrial Trade Unions in South Korea. Journal of Industrial Relations, 41(2), 272–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linhares, R. (2015). The Strikes from 2011 to 2013. Labour Sciences Journal, 5, 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMichael, P. (1990). Incorporating Comparison Within a World-Historical Perspective: An Alternative Comparative Method. American Sociological Review, 55(3), 385–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nowak, J. (2016). Class Coalitions or Struggles Within the Working Class? Social Unrest in India and Brazil During the Global Crisis. Workers of the World. International Journal on Strikes and Social Conflicts, 1(8), 71–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortellado, P., & Solano, E. (2016). Nova direita nas ruas? Uma Análise do Descompasso entre Manifestantes e os Convocantes dos Protestos Antigoverno de 2015. Perseu, 7(11), 170–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratap, S. (2011). Trade Union Repression in India. AMRC Research Paper. http://www.amrc.org.hk/system/files/Research%20PaperTrade%20Union%20Repression%20in%20India.pdf. Accessed 29 May 2014.

  • Rajagopal, A. (2011). The Emergency as Prehistory of the New Indian Middle Class. Modern Asian Studies, 45(5), 1003–1049.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Satgar, V. (2012). Beyond Marikana: The Post-Apartheid South African State. Africa Spectrum, 47(2/3), 33–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scherer-Warren, I. (2014). Manifestacões de Rua no Brasil 2013: encontros e desencontros na politica. Cadernos CRH, 27(71), 417–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silver, B. (2003). Forces of Labour. Workers’ Movements and Globalization Since 1870. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Singer, A. (2018). O Lulismo em Crise. Um Quebra-Cabeça do Período Dilma (2011–2016). São Paulo: Companhia das Letras.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sitapati, V. (2011). What Anna Hazare’s Movement and India’s New Middle Classes Say About Each Other. Economic and Political Weekly, 46(30), 39–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, P. (2013). ‘Kings of the Mine’: Rock Drill Operators and the 2012 Strike Wave on South African Mines. South African Review of Sociology, 44(3), 42–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Linden, M. (2008). Workers of the World. Essays Toward a Global Labour History. Leiden: Brill.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Van Wersch, H. (1992). The Bombay Textile Strike 1982–1983. Delhi: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Visvanathan, S. (2012). Anna Hazare and the Battle Against Corruption. Cultural Critique, 81, 103–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallerstein, I. (1974). The Rise and Future Demise of the World Capitalist System: Concepts for Comparative Analysis. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 16(4), 387–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodiwiss, A. (1991). Law, Labour and Society in Japan: From Repression to Reluctant Recognition. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Nowak, J. (2019). Conclusion. In: Mass Strikes and Social Movements in Brazil and India. Studies in the Political Economy of Public Policy. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05375-8_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics