Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Externalizing Co-design Cognition Through Immersive Retrospection

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Design Computing and Cognition '18 (DCC 2018)

Included in the following conference series:

  • 965 Accesses

Abstract

This paper presents an insightful explanation of designers’ experience over time during immersive co-design sessions. The data was collected through immersive retrospection interviews, here used to assess a co-design activity. Three teams of two proficient designers individually self-evaluated their perceived experience by observing an immersive video unfolding their respective co-design sessions inside a social virtual environment (Hyve-3D).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Gero JS, Mc Neill T (1998) An approach to the analysis of design protocols. Des Stud 19:21–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. van Someren MW, Barnard YF, Sandberg JAC (1994) The think aloud method: a practical guide to modelling cognitive processes. Academic Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lloyd P, Lawson B, Scott P (1995) Can concurrent verbalization reveal design cognition? Des Stud 16:237–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Akin Ö, Akin C (1996) Frames of reference in architectural design: analysing the hyperacclamation (A-h-a-!). Des Stud 17:341–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cross N (2001) Design cognition: results from protocol and other empirical studies of design activity. In: Eastman C, Newstatter W, McCracken M (eds) Design knowing and learning: cognition in design education. Elsevier, Oxford, UK, pp 79–103

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Schön DA (1983) The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action. Basic Books, Avebury

    Google Scholar 

  7. Suwa M, Gero J, Purcell T (1999) Unexpected discoveries: how designers discover hidden features in sketches. In: Visual and spatial reasoning in design (Vol. 99). Key centre of design computing and cognition. University of Sydney, Sydney

    Google Scholar 

  8. Tang HH (2002) Exploring the roles of sketches and knowledge in the design process. Department of Architectural and Design Science, Faculty of Architecture, University of Sydney

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bilda Z, Demirkan H (2003) An insight on designers’ sketching activities in traditional versus digital media. Des Stud 24:27–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Suwa M, Purcell T, Gero J (1998) Macroscopic analysis of design processes based on a scheme for coding designers’ cognitive actions. Des Stud 19:455–483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Suwa M, Tversky B (1997) What do architects and students perceive in their design sketches? A protocol analysis. Des Stud 18:385–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gero JS, Tang HH (2001) The differences between retrospective and concurrent protocols in revealing the process-oriented aspects of the design process. Des Stud 22:283–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bowers VA, Snyder HL (1990) Concurrent versus retrospective verbal protocol for comparing window usability. Proc Human Factors Soc Ann Meet 34:1270–1274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Dorta T, Kalay Y, Lesage A, Pérez E (2011) Elements of design conversation in the interconnected HIS. Int J Des Sci Technol 18:65–80

    Google Scholar 

  15. Brinthaupt TM, Hein MB, Kramer TE (2009) The self-talk scale: development, factor analysis, and validation. J Pers Assess 91:82–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Dong A, Kleinsmann M, Valkenburg R (2009) Affect-in-cognition through the language of appraisals. Des Stud 30:138–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Safin S, Dorta T, Pierini D, Kinayoglu G, Lesage A (2016) Design Flow 2.0, assessing experience during ideation with increased granularity: a proposed method. Des Stud 47:23–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Csikszentmihalyi M (1997) Creativity: flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. Harper Collins, New York

    Google Scholar 

  19. Marchand-Beaudry E, Han X, Dorta T (2017) Immersive retrospection by video-photogrammetry: UX assessment tool of interactions in museums, a case study. In: Fioravanti A, Cursi S, Elahmar S, Gargaro S, Loffreda G, November G, Trento A (eds) Proceedings of the 35th eCAADe conference—volume 2, ShoCK!—Sharing Computational Knowledge!, pp 729–738

    Google Scholar 

  20. Dorta T, Kinayoglu G, Hoffmann M (2016) Hyve-3D and the 3D cursor: architectural co-design with freedom in virtual reality. Int J Archit Comput 14:87–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Hybridlab, University of Montreal, Montreal, Canada

    Tomás Dorta, Emmanuel Beaudry Marchand & Davide Pierini

Authors
  1. Tomás Dorta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Emmanuel Beaudry Marchand
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Davide Pierini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tomás Dorta .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Computer Science and School of Architecture, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, NC, USA

    John S. Gero

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Dorta, T., Beaudry Marchand, E., Pierini, D. (2019). Externalizing Co-design Cognition Through Immersive Retrospection. In: Gero, J. (eds) Design Computing and Cognition '18. DCC 2018. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05363-5_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05363-5_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-05362-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-05363-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation