Abstract
This paper introduces the notion of ekphrasis in the arts as a basis for developing a framework of creative designing. Ekphrasis is the transformation of a concept from one medium or domain (e.g. sculpture) to another medium or domain (e.g. music). When used in design, ekphrasis enables the use of new processes afforded within the new domain that can produce new concepts not available in the original domain. We show how five known mechanisms of creative designing—emergence, analogy, combination, mutation and first principles—can be included in a general framework as instantiations of ekphrasis. This framework is developed based on the function–behaviour–structure (FBS) ontology and its application to affordances.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Gero JS (2017) Ekphrasis as a design method. In: International conference on engineering design 2017, Vancouver, Canada (to appear)
Gero JS (2017) Generalizing ekphrastic expression: a foundation for a computational method to aid creative design. In: Janssen P, Loh P, Raonic A, Schnabel MA (eds) Protocols, flows and glitches. Proceedings of the 22nd international conference of the association for computer-aided architectural design research in Asia (CAADRIA) 2017, pp 345–354
Fowler DP (1991) Narrate and describe: the problem of ekphrasis. J Roman Stud 81:25–35
Goldhill S (2007) What is ekphrasis for? Class Philology 102(1):1–19
Knapp JA (2011) Harnessing the visual: from illustration to ekphrasis, Image ethics in Shakespeare and Spenser. Palgrave Macmillan, UK, pp 31–46
Leader S (2014) Ekphrasis and its reverse. Academic commons program, paper 11. http://digitalcommons.risd.edu/grad_academiccommonsprogram/11 (RISD paper)
Newby Z (2002) Testing the boundaries of ekphrasis: Lucian on the Hall. Ramus 31(1–2):126–135
Scott GF (1992) Ekphrasis. Eur Romantic Rev 3(2):215–224
Ranjan A, Gabora L, O’Connor B (2013) The cross-domain re-interpretation of artistic ideas. arXiv preprint arXiv:1308.4706
Ranjan A, Gabora L, O’Connor B (2013) Evidence that cross-domain re-interpretations of creative ideas are recognizable. arXiv preprint arXiv:1310.0519
Alstott J, Triulzi G, Yan B, Luo J (2017) Inventors’ explorations across technology domains. Des Sci 3
Boden MA (1991) The creative mind: myths and mechanisms. Basic Books, New York
Suwa M, Gero JS, Purcell T (1999) Unexpected discoveries and s-inventions of design requirements: a key to creative designs. In: Gero JS, Maher ML (eds) Computational models of creative design IV. Key Centre of Design Computing and Cognition, University of Sydney, Australia, pp 297–320
Gero JS, Kannengiesser U (2011) Design. In: Runco MA, Pritzker SR (eds) Encyclopedia of creativity, vol 1, 2nd edn. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 369–375
Gero JS (1996) Creativity, emergence and evolution in design. Knowl Based Syst 9(7):435–448
Gero JS, Kannengiesser U (2012) Representational affordances in design, with examples from analogy making and optimization. Res Eng Des 23(3):235–249
Gero JS, Kannengiesser U (2014) The function-behaviour-structure ontology of design. In Chakrabarti A, Blessing LTM (eds) An anthology of theories and models of design. Springer, Berlin, pp 263–283
Tennis JT (2003) Two axes of domains for domain analysis. Knowl Organ 30(3–4):191–195
Gero JS (1992) Creativity, emergence and evolution in design. In: Gero JS, Sudweeks F (eds) Preprints computational models of creative design. Department of Architectural and Design Science, University of Sydney, pp 1–28
Stiny G (1980) Introduction to shape and shape grammars. Environ Planning B Urban Analytics City Sci 7(3):343–351
Deldin J-M, Schuknecht M (2014) The AskNature database: enabling solutions in biomimetic design. In: Goel AK, McAdams DA, Stone RB (eds) Biologically inspired design: computational methods and tools. Springer, London, pp 17–27
Gentner D (1983) Structure-mapping: a theoretical framework for analogy. Cogn Sci 7(2):155–170
Nagai Y, Taura Y, Mukai F (2009) Concepts blending and dissimilarity: factors for creative concept generation process. Des Stud 30(6):648–675
Koestler A (1964) The act of creation. Hutchinson, London
Rosenman MA, Gero JS (1989) Creativity in design using a prototype approach. Preprints modeling creativity and knowledge-based creative design. Design Computing Unit, Department of Architectural and Design Science, University of Sydney, pp 207–232
Cagan J, Agogino AM (1991) Dimensional variable expansion—a formal approach to innovative design. Res Eng Des 3(2):75–85
Aelion V, Cagan J, Powers G (1991) Inducing optimally directed innovative designs from chemical engineering first principles. Comput Chem Eng 15(9):619–627
Howard TJ, Culley SJ, Dekoninck E (2008) Describing the creative design process by the integration of engineering design and cognitive psychology literature. Des Stud 29(2):160–180
Wallas G (1926) The art of thought. Jonathan Cape, London
Segal E (2004) Incubation in insight problem solving. Creativity Res J 16(1):141–148
Acknowledgements
This research is supported in part by the US National Science Foundation, Grant No. CMMI-1400466. Figure 5 was used with permission from Janet Manalo and Suzanne Bruce.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Kannengiesser, U., Gero, J.S. (2019). Ekphrasis as a Basis for a Framework for Creative Design Processes. In: Gero, J. (eds) Design Computing and Cognition '18. DCC 2018. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05363-5_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05363-5_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-05362-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-05363-5
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)