Abstract
Despite the fact that recommender systems are becoming increasingly popular in every aspect of the web, users might hesitate to use these personalization-based services in return of their personal information if they believe their privacy is compromised in any possible way. While new privacy regulations in Europe bring more transparency and control over data collection to users, this study aims to provide a better understanding of the users’ perception over privacy in recommender systems domain over several aspects such as behavioral preferences, privacy preferences, trust, data ownership and control over own data through an on-line survey. The results indicate that the majority of the respondents consider that recommender systems violate user privacy in different ways. Further, the results indicate that increased control and perceived sense of ownership over one’s own data may help to decrease the negative attitudes towards recommender systems and providers and to re-instate and increase users’ trust. However, the findings also indicate that users’ trust may be hard to re-establish in cases where the thought of “apparently”/in theory go hand in hand with more transparency and user control will in reality/in practice not lead to drastic changes.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ackerman, M.S., Cranor, L.F., Reagle, J.: Privacy in e-commerce: examining user scenarios and privacy preferences. In: Proceedings of the 1st ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce, pp. 1–8. ACM (1999)
Adams, A.: Users’ perception of privacy in multimedia communication. In: Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 1999, pp. 53–54. ACM (1999)
Antón, A.I., Earp, J.B., Young, J.D.: How internet users’ privacy concerns have evolved since 2002. IEEE Secur. Priv. 8(1), 21–27 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1109/MSP.2010.38. ISSN: 1540-7993
Awad, N.F., Krishnan, M.S.: The personalization privacy paradox: an empirical evaluation of information transparency and the willingness to be profiled online for personalization. MIS Q. 30(1), 13–28 (2006). http://www.jstor.org/stable/25148715
Barnes, S.B.: A privacy paradox: social networking in the United States. First Monday 11(9) (2006). http://journals.uic.edu/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/1394
Cavoukian, A., Fisher, A., Killen, S., Hoffman, D.A.: Remote home health care technologies: how to ensure privacy? Build it in: privacy by design. Identity Inf. Soc. 3(2), 363–378 (2010)
Chellappa, R.K., Sin, R.G.: Personalization versus privacy: an empirical examination of the online consumers dilemma. Inf. Tech. Manag. 6(2–3), 181–202 (2005)
European Commission: Attitudes on data protection and electronic identity in the European Union, June 2011. http://ec.europa.eu/commfrontoffice/publicopinion/archives/ebs/ebs_359_en.pdf
European Commission: 2018 reform EU data protection rules, May 2018. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/priorities/justice-and-fundamental-rights/data-protection/2018-reform-eu-data-protection-rules_en
Cranor, L.F., Reagle, J., Ackerman, M.S.: Beyond concern: understanding net users attitudes about online privacy. In: The Internet Upheaval: Raising Questions, Seeking Answers in Communications Policy, pp. 47–70 (2000)
Fox, S., Rainie, L., Horrigan, J., Lenhart, A., Spooner, T., Carter, C.: Trust and privacy online: why Americans want to rewrite the rules. The Pew Internet and American Life Project, pp. 1–29 (2000)
Henry, G.T.: Practical Sampling, vol. 21. Sage, Thousand Oaks (1990)
Knijnenburg, B.P., Berkovsky, S.: Privacy for recommender systems: tutorial abstract. In: Proceedings of the Eleventh ACM Conference on Recommender Systems, pp. 394–395. ACM (2017)
Kobsa, A.: Tailoring privacy to users’ needs1. In: Bauer, M., Gmytrasiewicz, P.J., Vassileva, J. (eds.) UM 2001. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2109, pp. 301–313. Springer, Heidelberg (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44566-8_52
Lederer, S., Mankoff, J., Dey, A.K.: Who wants to know what when? Privacy preference determinants in ubiquitous computing. In: Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2003, pp. 724–725. ACM (2003)
Mohallick, I., Özgöbek, Ö.: Exploring privacy concerns in news recommender systems. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Web Intelligence, pp. 1054–1061. ACM (2017)
Mohallick, I., Özgöbek, Ö.: A survey on Norwegian user perspective on privacy in recommender systems. In: Proceedings of the 3rd Norwegian Big Data Symposium (NOBIDS 2017) in Conjunction with NxtMedia Conference 2017. CEUR Workshop Proceedings (2017)
Oates, B.J.: Researching Information Systems and Computing. Sage Publications Ltd., Thousand Oaks (2006)
Olson, J., Grudin, J., Horvitz, E.: Toward understanding preferences for sharing and privacy. In: Proceedings of the CHI (2004)
Olson, J.S., Grudin, J., Horvitz, E.: A study of preferences for sharing and privacy. In: Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2005, pp. 1985–1988. ACM (2005)
Pötzsch, S.: Privacy awareness: a means to solve the privacy paradox? In: Matyáš, V., Fischer-Hübner, S., Cvrček, D., Švenda, P. (eds.) Privacy and Identity 2008. IAICT, vol. 298, pp. 226–236. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03315-5_17
Taylor, D.G., Davis, D.F., Jillapalli, R.: Privacy concern and online personalization: the moderating effects of information control and compensation. Electron. Commer. Res. 9(3), 203–223 (2009)
Toch, E., Wang, Y., Cranor, L.F.: Personalization and privacy: a survey of privacy risks and remedies in personalization-based systems. User Model. User-Adap. Interact. 22(1–2), 203–220 (2012)
Acknowledgments
This work is a part of the master thesis which is supported by the NTNU SmartMedia program on news recommendation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Mohallick, I., De Moor, K., Özgöbek, Ö., Gulla, J.A. (2018). Towards New Privacy Regulations in Europe: Users’ Privacy Perception in Recommender Systems. In: Wang, G., Chen, J., Yang, L. (eds) Security, Privacy, and Anonymity in Computation, Communication, and Storage. SpaCCS 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11342. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05345-1_27
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05345-1_27
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-05344-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-05345-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)