Skip to main content

Complex Geoinformation Analysis of Multiple Natural Hazards Using Fuzzy Logic

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Intelligent Systems for Crisis Management (Gi4DM 2018)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography ((LNGC))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Natural hazards are existence of natural components and processes, which create a situation that could negatively affect people, the economy and the environment. Rising public awareness about natural hazards could improve the quality of life, save financial resources and even save lives. The complicated essence of natural hazards and the interrelations between natural components require a complex analysis of natural hazard factors. In the current research, the factors are analysed by application of analytic hierarchy process. Spatial overlay analysis is done in GIS environment and as a result, landslide susceptibility and flood susceptibility maps are created. Single hazard maps are overlaid in order to receive a complex hazard level. A fuzzy logic with four inputs and one output is designed. This model is used to determine the complex level of hazard considering the factors interaction. The results of the current research and suggested approach could support decision makers in civil protection, territorial planning and management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Arnoldus HML (1980) An approximation of rainfall factor in the Universal Soil Loss Equation. In: De Boodt M, Gabriels D (eds) Assessment of erosion. Wiley, Chichester, pp 127–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Climate data for cities worldwide (2018) Climate data. https://en.climate-data.org. Accessed 22 Nov 2017

  • CORINE Land Cover project (2012). http://eea.government.bg/bg/projects/korine-14/index. Accessed 25 Apr 2016

  • Costanzo D, Rotigliano E, Irigaray C, Jimenez-Peralvarez JD, Chacon J (2012) Factors selection in landslide susceptibility modelling on large scale following the gis matrix method: application to the river Beiro basin (Spain). Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci, 12:327–340. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-12-327-2012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costea M (2012) Using the Fournier indexes in estimating rainfall erosivity. Case study-the Secasul Mare Basin. Aerul si Apa. Componente ale Mediului, pp 313–320

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Mauro C, Bouchon S, Carpignano A, Golia E, Peressin S (2006) Definition of multi-risk maps at regional level as management tool: Experience gained by civil protection authorities of Piemonte region. In: Proceedings of the 5th Conference on risk assessment and management in the civil and industrial settlements. http://conference.ing.unipi.it/vgr2006/archivio/Archivio/2006/Articoli/700196.pdf. Accessed 17 Sept 2017

  • Eshrati L, Mahmoudzadeh M, Taghvaei M (2015) Multi hazards risk assessment, a new methodology. Int J Health Syst Disaster Manag 3(2):79–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Feizizadeh B, Roodposhti MS, Jankowski P, Blaschke T (2014) A GIS-based extended fuzzy multi-criteria evaluation for landslide susceptibility mapping. Comput Geosci 73:208–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flood Risk Management Plan, Black Sea Directorate—Varna (2018) BSBD. https://www.bsbd.org/uk/FR_mplans.html. Accessed 5 Feb 2018

  • Fotis M, Georgia M, Apostolos V (2012) Estimation of the Prefecture of Evros vulnerability in flood cases using GIS and fuzzy set algebra. Paper presented at the 16th international water technology conference, Istanbul, Turkey, 7–10 May 2012

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilat, A. (2011) MATLAB—An Introduction with Applications. 4-th ed., Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill JC, Malamud BD (2014) Reviewing and visualizing the interactions of natural hazards. Rev Geophys 52:680–722

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gill J C, Malamud BD (2016) Hazard interactions and interaction networks (cascades) within multi-hazard methodologies. Earth Syst. Dynam. 7:659–679. https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-7-659-2016, www.earth-syst-dynam.net/7/659/2016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grozavu A, Margarint MC, Patriche CV (2010) GIS applications for landslide susceptibility assessment: a case study in IaÅŸi County (Moldavian Plateau, Romania). Trans Inf Commun Technol 43:393–404. https://doi.org/10.2495/RISK100341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harab MM, Dell’Acqua F (2017) Remote Sensing in Multi-Risk Assessment: Improving disaster preparedness. IEEE Geosc Remote Sens Mag 5(1):53–65. https://doi.org/10.1109/MGRS.2016.2625100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ilanloo M (2011) A comparative study of fuzzy logic approach for landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS: An experience of Karaj dam basin in Iran. Proced Soc Behav Sci 19:668–676

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang W, Deng L, Chen L, Wu J, Li J (2009) Risk assessment and validation of flood disaster based on fuzzy mathematics. Prog Nat Sci 19:1419–1425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanchev I (1995a) Geological map of Bulgaria, Map sheet Sliven. Scale 1:100000. Geology and Geophysics JSC

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanchev I (1995b) Geological map of Bulgaria, map sheet Sungurlare. Scale 1:100000. Geology and Geophysics JSC

    Google Scholar 

  • Karagiozi E, Fountoulis I, Konstantinidis A, Andreadakis E, Ntouros K (2011) Flood hazard assessment based on geomorphological analysis with GIS tools—the case of Laconia (Peloponnesus, Greece). In: Proceedings of the 8th international symposium on GIS, Ostrava 2011, pp 201–216

    Google Scholar 

  • Kazakis N, Kougias I, Patsialis T (2015) Assessment of flood hazard areas at a regional scale using an index-based approach and Analytical Hierarchy Process: Application in Rhodope-Evros region. Greece Sci Total Environ 538:555–563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kayastha P, Bijukchhen SM, Dhital MR, De Smedt F (2013) GIS based landslide susceptibility mapping using a fuzzy logic approach: A case study from Ghurmi-Dhad Khola Area, Eastern Nepal. J Geol Soc India 82:249–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kourgialas NN, George P, Karatzas GP (2011) Flood management and a GIS modelling method to assess flood-hazard areas—a case study. Hydrol Sci J 56(2):212–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2011.555836

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kreibich H, Bubeck P, Kunz M, Mahlke H, Parolai S, Khazai B, Daniell J, Lakes T, Schroter K (2014) A review of multiple natural hazards and risks in Germany. Nat Hazards 74:2279–2304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lari S, Frattini P, Crosta GB (2014) A probabilistic approach for landslide hazard analysis. Eng Geol 182:3–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu B, Siu Y L, Mitchell G (2016a) Hazard interaction analysis for multi-hazard risk assessment: a systematic classification based on hazard-forming environment. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 16:629–642. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-16-629-2016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu B, Siu YL, Mitchell G, Xu W (2016b) The danger of mapping risk from multiple natural hazards. Nat Hazard 82:139–153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2184-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nikolova V, Zlateva P (2017) Assessment of flood vulnerability using fuzzy logic and geographical information systems. In: Murayama Y, Velev D, Zlateva P et al (eds) Information technology in disaster risk reduction 2016, IFIP Advances in information and communication technology, vol 501. Springer, Cham, pp 254–265. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68486-4_20

    Google Scholar 

  • Pandey AR, Shahbodaghlou F (2014) Landslide hazard mapping of Nagadhunga-Naubise section of the Tribhuvan highway in Nepal with GIS application. J Geogr Inf Syst 6:723–732

    Google Scholar 

  • Perera EDP, Lahat L (2015) Fuzzy logic based on flood forecasting model for the Kelantan river basin, Malaysia. J Hydro-environ Res 9:542–553

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prevention Web (2018) Strengthening climate change adaptation through effective disaster risk reduction. http://www.preventionweb.net. Accessed 6 Sept 2018

  • Reuter HI, Nelson A, Jarvis A (2007) An evaluation of void filling interpolation methods for SRTM data. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 21(9):983–1008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosso R, Rulli M C, Vannucchi G (2006) A physically based model for the hydrologic control on shallow landsliding. Water Resource Research 42, W 06410. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005wr004369

  • Saaty RW (1987) The analytic hierarchy process—what it is and how it is used. Math Model 9(3–5):161–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tazik E, Jahantab Z, Bakhtiari M, Rezaei A, Alavipanah S K (2014) Landslide susceptibility mapping by combining the three methods: Fuzzy logic, Frequency ratio and Analytical hierarchy process in Dozain basin. Paper presented at the 1st ISPRS International Conference on Geospatial Information Research, 15–17 November 2014, Tehran, Iran. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, vol XL-2/W3. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprsarchives-XL-2-W3-267-2014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tzvetkova S (2017) Ecological aspects of the management of transport enterprises. Scientific Journal Mechanics. Transport and Communications 15 (3/3): IX-19—IX-25

    Google Scholar 

  • United National Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (2018) UNISDR Annual report 2017. https://www.unisdr.org/files/58158_unisdr2017annualreport.pdf. Accessed 6 Sept 2018

  • Velev D, Zlateva P (2018) Information system framework for integrated risk assessment from natural disasters. International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences—ISPRS Archives 42 (3W4): 535–541

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeganeh N, Sabri S (2014) Flood vulnerability assessment in Iskandar Malaysia using multi-criteria evaluation and fuzzy logic. Res J Appl Sci Eng Technol 8(16):1794–1806

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng N, Tachikawa Y, Takara K (2008) A Distributed flood inundation model integrating with rainfall-runoff processes using GIS and remote sensing data. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences. vol XXXVII, Part B4. Beijing, pp 1513–1518

    Google Scholar 

  • Zlateva P, Velev D (2013) Complex risk analysis of natural hazards through fuzzy logic. J Adv Manag Sci 1(4):395–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Plamena Zlateva .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Nikolova, V., Zlateva, P. (2019). Complex Geoinformation Analysis of Multiple Natural Hazards Using Fuzzy Logic. In: Altan, O., Chandra, M., Sunar, F., Tanzi, T. (eds) Intelligent Systems for Crisis Management. Gi4DM 2018. Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05330-7_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics