Skip to main content

Synergistic Exploitation of Geoinformation Methods for Post-earthquake 3D Mapping and Damage Assessment

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography ((LNGC))

Abstract

This paper presents a methodological framework, which establishes links among the: i. 3D mapping, ii. 3D model creation and iii. damage classification grades of masonry buildings by European Macroseismic Scale-98 and the application of geoinformation methods towards 3D mapping and damage assessment after a catastrophic earthquake event. We explore the synergistic exploitation of a Real Time Kinematics system, terrestrial photogrammetry, Unmanned Aircraft Systems and terrestrial laser scanner for collecting accurate and high-resolution geospatial information. The proposed workflow was applied at the catastrophic earthquake of June 12th, 2017 on the traditional settlement of Vrisa on the island of Lesvos, Greece. The Structure from Motion method has been applied on the high-resolution terrestrial and aerial photographs, for producing accurate and very detailed 3D point clouds of the damaged buildings of the Vrisa settlement. Additionally, two Orthophoto maps and two Digital Surface Models have been created, with a spatial resolution of 5 cm and 3 cm, respectively. The first orthophoto map has been created just one day after the earthquake, while the second one, a month later. The significant advantages of the proposed methodology are: (a) the production of reliable and accurate 2D and 3D information at both village and building scales, (b) the ability to support scientists during building damage assessment phase and (c) the proposed damage documentation provides all the appropriate information which can augment all experts and stakeholders, national and local organizations focusing on the post-earthquake management and reconstruction processes of the Vrisa traditional village.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adams SM, Friedland CJ (2011) A survey of unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) usage for imagery collection in disaster research and management. In: Proceedings of the ninth international workshop on remote sensing for disaster response. Stanford, CA, USA, pp 15–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Anil EB, Akinci B, Garrett JH, Kurc O (2013) Characterization of laser scanners for detecting cracks for post-earthquake damage inspection. In: 30th ISARC. Montreal, Canada, pp 313–320

    Google Scholar 

  • Bemis SP, Micklethwaite S, Turner D, James MR, Akciz S, Thiele ST, Bangash HA (2014) Ground-based and UAV-Based photogrammetry: a multi-scale, high-resolution mapping tool for structural geology and paleoseismology. J Struct Geol 69:163–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2014.10.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bose S, Nozari A, Mohammadi ME, Stavridis A, Babak M, Wood R, Gillins D, Barbosa A (2016) Structural assessment of a school building in Sankhu, Nepal damaged due to torsional response during the 2015 Gorkha earthquake. In: Pakzad S, Juan C (eds) Conference proceedings of the society for experimental mechanics series, Dynamics of civil structures. Springer, Cham, pp 31–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Calantropio A, Chiabrando F, Sammartano G, Spanò A, Losè LT (2018) UAV strategies validation and remote sensing data for damage assessment in post-disaster scenarios. Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens Spat Inf Sci XLII-3/W4:121–128. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-xlii-3-w4-121-2018

  • Chang KT, Wang EH, Chang YM, Cheng HK (2008) Post-disaster structural evaluation using a terrestrial laser scanner. Integrating generations FIG working week 2008. Stockholm, Sweden, pp 1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen J, Liu H, Zheng J, Lv M, Yan B, Hu X, Gao Y (2016) Damage degree evaluation of earthquake area using UAV aerial image. Int J Aerosp Eng 2016:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/2052603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dominici D, Alicandro M, Massimi V (2017) UAV photogrammetry in the post-earthquake scenario: case studies in L’Aquila. Geomat Nat Hazards Risk 8:87–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2016.1176605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dong L, Shan J (2013) A comprehensive review of earthquake-induced building damage detection with remote sensing techniques. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 84:85–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2013.06.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erkal BG (2017) The prototype of a software application for laser and image-based surface damage detection. In: Proceedings of the 2nd world congress on civil, structural, and environmental engineering (CSEE’17), pp 1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) (2016) Damage assessment operations manual-A guide to assessing damage and impact

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez Galarreta J, Kerle N, Gerke M (2015) UAV-based urban structural damage assessment using object-based image analysis and semantic reasoning. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 15:1087–1101. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-15-1087-2015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gomez C, Purdie H (2016) UAV-based photogrammetry and geocomputing for hazards and disaster risk monitoring–A review. Geoenvironmental Disasters 3:23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40677-016-0060-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grünthal G (1998) European Macroseismic Scale 1998. Chaiers du Centre Européen de Géodynamique et de Séismologie, Luxembourg

    Google Scholar 

  • Guldur B, Hajjar J (2016) Automated classification of detected surface damage from point clouds with supervised learning. In: Proceedings of the 33rd ISARC. Auburn, AL, USA, pp 307–313

    Google Scholar 

  • Guldur Erkal B, Hajjar JF (2017) Laser-based surface damage detection and quantification using predicted surface properties. Autom Constr 83:285–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2017.08.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jafari B, Khaloo A, Lattanzi D (2017) Deformation tracking in 3D point clouds via statistical sampling of direct cloud-to-cloud distances. J Nondestruct Eval 36:65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10921-017-0444-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kayen R, Collins BD, Bawden G, Pack RT (2006) Earthquake deformation analysis using terrestrial scanning Laser-LIDAR technology. In: 8th US national conference on earthquake engineering. San Francisco, California, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiratzi A (2018) The 12 June 2017 Mw 6.3 Lesvos Island (Aegean Sea) earthquake: slip model and directivity estimated with finite-fault inversion. Tectonophysics 724–725:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2018.01.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mukupa W, Roberts GW, Hancock CM, Al-Manasir K (2016) A review of the use of terrestrial laser scanning application for change detection and deformation monitoring of structures. Surv Rev 49:99–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/00396265.2015.1133039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nimodia C, Deshmukh HR (2012) Android operating system. Softw Eng 3:10–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsen MJ, Chen Z, Hutchinson T, Kuester F (2013) Optical techniques for multiscale damage assessment. Geomat Nat Hazards Risk 4:49–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2012.670668

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olsen MJ, Cheung KF, YamazakI Y, Butcher S, Garlock M, Yim S, McGarity S, Robertson I, Burgos L, Young YL (2012) Damage assessment of the 2010 Chile earthquake and tsunami using terrestrial laser scanning. Earthq Spectra 28:S179–S197. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.4000021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olsen MJ, Kayen R (2012) Post-earthquake and tsunami 3D laser scanning forensic investigations. Forensic engineering 2012. American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA, pp 477–486

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Papadimitriou P, Kassaras I, Kaviris G, Tselentis G-A, Voulgaris N, Lekkas E, Chouliaras G, Evangelidis C, Pavlou K, Kapetanidis V, Karakonstantis A, Kazantzidou-Firtinidou D, Fountoulakis I, Millas C, Spingos I, Aspiotis T, Moumoulidou A, Skourtsos E, Antoniou V, Andreadakis E, Mavroulis S, Kleanthi M (2018) The 12th June 2017 Mw = 6.3 Lesvos earthquake from detailed seismological observations. J Geodyn 115:23–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jog.2018.01.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papakonstantinou A, Doukari M, Moustakas A, Chrisovalantis D, Chaidas K, Roussou O, Athanasis N, Topouzelis K, Soulakellis N (2018) UAS multi-camera rig for post-earthquake damage 3D geovisualization of Vrisa village. In: Themistocleous K, Hadjimitsis DG, Michaelides S, Ambrosia V, Papadavid G (eds) Sixth international conference on remote sensing and geoinformation of the environment (RSCy2018). SPIE, p 52

    Google Scholar 

  • Pesci A, Teza G, Bonali E, Casula G, Boschi E (2013) A laser scanning-based method for fast estimation of seismic-induced building deformations. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 79:185–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2013.02.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puente I, Lindenbergh R, Van Natijne A, Esposito R, Schipper R (2018) Monitoring of progressive damage in buildings using laser scan data. In: ISPRS Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens Spat Inf Sci XLII-2:923–929. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-xlii-2-923-2018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schütz M (2016) Potree: rendering large point clouds in web. Master Thesis, Vienna University of Technology

    Google Scholar 

  • Snavely N (2011) Scene reconstruction and visualization from internet photo collections: a survey. IPSJ Trans Comput Vis Appl 3:44–66. https://doi.org/10.2197/ipsjtcva.3.44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snavely N, Seitz SM, Szeliski R (2008) Modeling the world from internet photo collections. Int J Comput Vis 80:189–210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11263-007-0107-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song M, Yousefianmoghadam S, Mohammadi M-E, Moaveni B, Stavridis A, Wood RL (2018) An application of finite element model updating for damage assessment of a two-story reinforced concrete building and comparison with lidar. Struct Heal Monit 17:1129–1150. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475921717737970

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Triggs B, McLauchlan PF, Hartley RI, Fitzgibbon AW (2000) Bundle adjustment—a modern synthesis. In: Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp 298–372

    Google Scholar 

  • Westoby MJ, Brasington J, Glasser NF, Hambrey MJ, Reynolds JM (2012) ‘Structure-from-Motion’ photogrammetry: a low-cost, effective tool for geoscience applications. Geomorphology 179:300–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2012.08.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu Z, Yang J, Peng C, Wu Y, Jiang X, Li R, Zheng Y, Gao Y, Liu S, Tian B (2014) Development of an UAS for post-earthquake disaster surveying and its application in Ms7.0 Lushan Earthquake, Sichuan, China. Comput Geosci 68:22–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2014.04.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamazaki F, Matsuda T, Denda S, Liu W (2015) Construction of 3D models of buildings damaged by earthquakes using UAV aerial images. In: Proceedings of the tenth pacific conference earthquake engineering building an earthquake-resilient pacific

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao X, Kargoll B, Omidalizarandi M, Xu X, Alkhatib H (2018) Model selection for parametric surfaces approximating 3D point clouds for deformation analysis. Remote Sens 10:634. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10040634

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhihua X, Lixin W, Yonglin S, Qiuling W, Ran W, Fashuai L (2014) Extraction of damaged building’s geometric features from multi-source point clouds. In: 2014 IEEE geoscience and remote sensing symposium, IEEE, pp 4764–4767

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This paper is a result of the research project “3D mapping of Vrisa settlement after the 12th June Lesvos earthquake” funded by the North Aegean Region. The authors would like to thank Prof. Pavlogeorgatos G., Chaidas K., Kalaitzis P., Kaloniatis Ch., Doukari M., Drolias A., Mauroeidi A., Zorbas K., Papazis N., Moustakas, A. and Makri D. for supporting the processing stage of this project. In this publication the work related to UAS data acquisition and UAS-SfM process has been carried out within the framework of the Greek State Scholarship Foundation (I.K.Y.) Scholarship Programs funded by the “Strengthening Post-Doctoral Research” Act from the resources of the OP “Human Resources Development and Lifelong Learning “priority axis 6, 8, 9 and co-financed by the European Social Fund–ESF and the Greek government.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nikolaos Soulakellis .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Soulakellis, N. et al. (2019). Synergistic Exploitation of Geoinformation Methods for Post-earthquake 3D Mapping and Damage Assessment. In: Altan, O., Chandra, M., Sunar, F., Tanzi, T. (eds) Intelligent Systems for Crisis Management. Gi4DM 2018. Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05330-7_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics