Skip to main content

Testing Augmented Reality Systems for Spotting Sub-Surface Impurities

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology ((IFIPAICT,volume 544))

Abstract

To limit musculoskeletal disorders we are working towards implementing collaborative robotics in strenuous or repetitive production work. Our objective is to evaluate augmented reality (AR) devices for assisting in near-distance tasks before applying and testing the displays in the context of human-robot collaboration in a production setting. This chapter describes the hardware setup and procedure for testing AR systems for showing sub-surface positions of foreign elements in an opaque mass. The goal is it test four types of setup in terms of user accuracy and speed, the four setups being a head-mounted see-through display, a mounted tablet-based see-through display, top-down surface projection and overlays on a static monitor. The experiment is carried out using a tracked HTC Vive controller with a needle attachment. Precision tasks are performed by 48 participants and each display is evaluated using the System Usability Scale and the NASA Task Load Index.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Avery, B., Sandor, C., Thomas, B.H.: Improving spatial perception for augmented reality X-Ray vision. In: 2009 IEEE Virtual Reality Conference, pp. 79–82. IEEE, March 2009. https://doi.org/10.1109/VR.2009.4811002, http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/4811002/

  2. Brooke, J., et al.: Sus-a quick and dirty usability scale. Usability Eval. Ind. 189(194), 4–7 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Elia, V., Gnoni, M.G., Lanzilotto, A.: Evaluating the application of augmented reality devices in manufacturing from a process point of view: an AHP based model. Expert Syst. Appl. 63, 187–197 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2016.07.006. http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0957417416303505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hart, S.G., Staveland, L.E.: Development of NASA-TLX (task load index): results of empirical and theoretical research. In: Advances in Psychology, vol. 52, pp. 139–183. Elsevier (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hayes, B., et al.: HRI workshop on human-robot teaming. In: Proceedings of the Tenth Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction Extended Abstracts - HRI 2015 Extended Abstracts, pp. 255–256. ACM Press, New York (2015). https://doi.org/10.1145/2701973.2714396, http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=2701973.2714396

  6. Kruijff, E., Swan, J.E., Feiner, S.: Perceptual issues in augmented reality revisited. In: 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality, pp. 3–12. IEEE, October 2010. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMAR.2010.5643530, http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5643530/

  7. Punnett, L., Wegman, D.H.: Work-related musculoskeletal disorders: the epidemiologic evidence and the debate. J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol. 14(1), 13–23 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JELEKIN.2003.09.015. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1050641103001251?via%3Dihub

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Schwerdtfeger, B., Pustka, D., Hofhauser, A., Klinker, G.: Using laser projectors for augmented reality. In: Proceedings of the 2008 ACM symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology - VRST 2008, p. 134. ACM Press, New York (2008). https://doi.org/10.1145/1450579.1450608, http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=1450579.1450608

  9. Singh, G., Swan, J.E., Jones, J.A., Ellis, S.R.: Depth judgment measures and occluding surfaces in near-field augmented reality. In: Proceedings of the 7th Symposium on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization - APGV 2010, p. 149. ACM Press, New York (2010). https://doi.org/10.1145/1836248.1836277, http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=1836248.1836277

  10. Swan, J., et al.: A perceptual matching technique for depth judgments in optical, see-through augmented reality. In: IEEE Virtual Reality Conference (VR 2006), pp. 19–26. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/VR.2006.13, http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/1667622/

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kasper Hald .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Hald, K., Rehm, M., Moeslund, T.B. (2019). Testing Augmented Reality Systems for Spotting Sub-Surface Impurities. In: Barricelli, B., et al. Human Work Interaction Design. Designing Engaging Automation. HWID 2018. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, vol 544. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05297-3_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05297-3_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-05296-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-05297-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics