Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Regulatory Framework for Nanomaterials in Agri-Food Systems

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Nanomaterials: Ecotoxicity, Safety, and Public Perception

Abstract

The use of nano-materials (NMs) in agri-food system is alarmingly increasing in the past few years, and this warrants to evolve a robust regulatory framework to gain the fruition of the nanotechnology while ensuring environmental safety. This is one of the maiden attempts to bring the information together for the readers to learn the current status of understanding. This chapter outlines the state-of-the-art information on risk assessment strategy for NMs and reviewed the current status of regulatory frameworks in a diverse countries with scientific advancement besides highlighting some key criteria for evolving a foolproof framework. The data have unequivocally demonstrated that the nano-regulatory frameworks available at present are digitally divided, and still lacks clarity. Among them, the European Union is taking a lead step in formulating a nano-regulatory framework for agricultural sector which needs to be further fine-tuned to evolve globally competitive nano-framework ensuring societal acceptance and environmental health. Based on the literature review, a conceptual framework has been suggested that encompasses pre-assessment phase, exposure assessment and risk characterization for regulating the applications of agricultural nanotechnologies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adholeya A, Das RK, Dubey MK, Kochar M, Singh R (2017) Zero draft policy on regulation of nanoproducts in agriculture. The Energy and Resources Institute (TERI), New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Amenta V, Aschberger K, Arenaa M, Bouwmeester H, Moniz FB, Brandhoff P, Gottardo S, Marvin HJP, Mech A, Pesudo Q, Rauscher H, Schoonjans R, Vettori MV, Weigel S, Peters RJ (2015) Regulatory aspects of nanotechnology in the agri feed food sector in EU and non-EU countries. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 73:463–476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anusya P, Nagaraj R, Janavi GJ, Subramanian KS, Paliyath G, Subramanian J (2016) Pre-harvest sprays of hexanal formulation for extending retention and shelf-life of mango (Mangifera indica L.) fruits. Sci Hort 210:221–230

    Google Scholar 

  • Arts JHE, Hadi M, Irfan AM, Keene AM, Kreiling R, Lyon D, Maier M, Michel K, Petry T, Sauer UG, Warheit D, Weinch K, Wohlleben W, Landseidel R (2014) A critical appraisal of existing concepts for the grouping of nanomaterials. RegulToxicol Pharmacol 70:492–506

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ashauer R, Escher BI (2010) Advantages of toxicokinetic and toxicodynamic modelling in aquatic ecotoxicology and risk assessment. J Environ Monit 12(11):2056–2061

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Berekaa MM (2015) Nanotechnology in food Industry; Advances in food processing, packaging and food safety. Int J Curr Microbiol App Sci 4:345–357

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bhushani JA, Anandharamakrishnan C (2014) Electrospinning and electrospraying techniques: potential food-based applications. Trends Food Sci Technol 38:21–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boverhof DR, Bramante CM, Butala JH, Clancy SF, Lafranconi M, West J, Gordon SC (2015) Comparative assessment of nanomaterial definitions and safety evaluation considerations. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 73:137–150

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cassee FR, Muijser H, Duistermaat E, Freijer JJ, Geerse KB, Marijnissen JC, Arts JH (2002) Particle size-dependent total mass deposition in lungs determines inhalation toxicity of cadmium chloride aerosols in rats. Application of a multiple path dosimetry model. Arch Toxicol 76(5–6):277–286

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chou BYH, Liao CM, Lin MC, Cheng HH (2006) Toxicokinetics/toxicodynamics of arsenic for farmed juvenile milkfish Chanoschanos and human consumption risk in BFD-endemic area of Taiwan. Environ Int 32(4):545–553

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dekkers S, Oomen AG, Bleeker EAJ, Vandebriel RJ, Micheletti C, Cabellos J, Janer G, Fuentes N, Azquez-Campos SV, Borges T, Silva MJ, Prina-Mello A, Movia D, Nesslany F, Ribeiro AR, Leite PE, Groenewold M, Cassee FR, Sips AJAM, Dijkzeul A, Teunenbroek TV, Wijnhoven SWP (2016) Towards a nanospecific approach for risk assessment. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 80:46–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeLoid GM, Cohen JM, Pyrgiotakis G (2015) Advanced computational modeling for in vitro nanomaterial dosimetry. Part Fibre Toxicol 12989-015-0109-1

    Google Scholar 

  • Demokritou P, Gass S, Pyrgiotakis G, Cohen JM, Goldsmith W, McKinney W, Frazer D, Ma J, Schwegler- Berry D, Brain J, Castranova V (2013) An in vivo and in vitro toxicological characterisation of realistic nanoscale CeO2 inhalation exposures. Nanotoxicology 7(8):1338–1350

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dharanivasan G, Sithanantham S, Kannan M, Chitra S, Kathiravan K, Janarthanan S (2017) Metal Oxide Nanoparticles Assisted Controlled Release of Synthetic Insect Attractant for Effective and Sustainable Trapping of Fruit Flies. J Clust Sci 28(4):2167–2183

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Doak SH, Griffiths SM, Manshian B, Singh N, Williams PM, Browns AP, Jenkins GJ (2009) Confounding experimental considerations in nanogenotoxicology. Mutagenesis 24(4):285–293

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Doak SH, Manshian B, Jenkins GJS, Singh JN (2012) In vitro genotoxicity testing strategy for nanomaterials and the adaptation of current OECD guidelines. Mutat Res 745(1–2):104–111

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • DST Dept of Science and Technology (2016) Guidelines and best practices for safe handling of nano-materials in research laboratories and industries. Centre for Knowledge Management of Nanoscience & Technology, Department of Science & Technology, Govt. of India, pp 1–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Dusinska M, Fjellsbo L, Magdolenova Z (2009) Testing strategies for the safety of nanoparticles used in medical applications. Nanomedicine (Lond) 4:605–607

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dusinska M, Pran ER, Carreira SC, Saunders M (2012) Critical evaluation of toxicity tests. In: Fadeel B, Pietroiusti A, Shvedova AA (eds) Adverse effects of engineered nanomaterials. Engineered nanomaterials: hazard, exposure and safety assessment. Academic press, Imprint of Elsevier, pp 6–63

    Google Scholar 

  • EC (2006) Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and the Council of 18 December 2006 concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH), establishing a European Chemicals Agency, amending Directive 1999/45/EC and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 793/93 and Commission Regulation (EC) No 1488/94 as well as Council Directive 76/769/EEC and Commission Directives 91/155/EEC, 93/67/EEC, 93/105/EC and 2000/21/EC. Off J Eur Union L396:1–525

    Google Scholar 

  • EC (2011) Commission recommendation of 18 October 2011 on the definition of nanomaterial (Text with EEA relevance) (2011/696/EU). Off J Eur Union L275:38–40

    Google Scholar 

  • EC (2012) Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council and the European Economic and Social Committee e Second Regulatory

    Google Scholar 

  • EC (2013) Commission delegated Regulation (EU) No 1363/2013 of 12 December 2013 amending Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the provision of food information to consumers as regards the definition of engineered nanomaterials. Off J Eur Union L343:26–28

    Google Scholar 

  • ECHA (2012) Guidance on Information Requirements and Chemical Safety Assessment e Appendix R7-1 Recommendations for Nanomaterials Applicable to Chapter R7a Endpoint Specific Guidance. Guidance for the Implementation of REACH. European Chemicals Agency (ECHA), Helsinki, Finland

    Google Scholar 

  • EFSA Scientific Committee (2011) Scientific opinion on guidance on the risk assessment of the application of nanoscience and nanotechnologies in the food and feed chain. EFSA J. 9, 2140

    Google Scholar 

  • Eleftheriadou M, Pyrgiotakis G, Demokritou P (2017) Nanotechnology to the rescue using nano-enabled approaches in microbiological food safety and quality. Curr Opin Biotechnol 44:87–93

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Epp A (2015) Nanoview—perception of nanotechnology by the German population and media coverage. In: 1st joint symposium on nanotechnology. BfR. http://www.bfr.bund.de/cm/349/nanoviewperception-of-nanotechnology-by-the-german-population-andmedia-coverage.pdf

  • Gallagher MJ, Allen A, Buchman JT, Qiu TA, Clement PL, Krause MOP, Gilbertson LM (2017) Research highlights: applications of life-cycle assessment as a tool for characterizing environmental impacts of engineered nanomaterials. Environ Sci-Nano 4:276–281

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ghaani M, Cozzolino CA, Castelli G, Farris S (2016a) An overview of the intelligent packaging technologies in the food sector. Trends Food Sci Technol 51:1–11

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ghaani M, Nasirizadeh N, Ardakani SAY, Mehrjardi FZ, Scampicchio M, Farris S (2016b) Development of an electrochemical nanosensor for the determination of gallic acid in food. Anal Methods 8:1103–1110

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez L, Sanderson BJS, Kirsch-Volders M (2011) Adaptations of the in vitro micronucleus assay for the genotoxicity assessment of nanomaterials. Mutagenesis 26(1):185–191

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Haas KH (2013) Industrial relevant production processes for nanomaterials and nanostructures. Safety aspects of engineered nanomaterials. Pan Standford Publishing Pte. pp 30–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Hristozova D, Gottardo S, Semenzin E, Oomen A, Bos P, Peijnenburg W, Tongeren MV, Nowack B, Hunt N, Brunelli A, Scott FJJ, Tran L, Marcomini A (2016) Environ Int 95:36–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Hund-Rinke K, Schlich K (2014) The potential benefits and limitations of different test procedures to determine the effects of Ag nanomaterials and AgNO3 on microbial nitrogen transformation in soil. Environ Sci Eur 26(1):28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ISO (2015) ISO/TS 80004-1:2015 nanotechnologies—vocabulary—Part 1: core terms ISO/TS 80004-1:2015 nanotechnologies—vocabulary—Part 1: core terms. Geneva Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeon CS (2016) Surface functionalization of bioanalytical applications: virus decorated gold microshells and modified synaptic cell adhesion molecules. PhD dissertation, Seoul National University

    Google Scholar 

  • Jincy M, Djanaguiraman M, Jeyakumar P, Subramanian KS, Jayasankar S, Paliyath G (2017) Inhibition of phospholipase D enzyme activity through hexanal leads to delayed mango (Mangiferaindica L.) fruit ripening through changes in oxidants andantioxidant enzymes activity. SciHort 218:316–332

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Justo HR, Dayan T (2014) European risk governance of nanotechnology: explaining the emerging regulatory policy. Res Pol 44:1527–1530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katouzian I, Jafari SM (2016) Nano-encapsulation as a promising approach for targeted delivery and controlled release of vitamins. Trends Food Sci Technol 53:34–48

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kleandrova VV, Luan F, González-Díaz H, Ruso JM, Speck-Planche A, Natália M, Cordeiro DS (2014) Computational tool for risk assessment of nanomaterials: novel QSTR-perturbation model for simultaneous prediction of ecotoxicity and cytotoxicity of uncoated and coated nanoparticles under multiple experimental conditions. Environ Sci Technol 48:86–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klöpffer W, Curran MA, Frankl P, Heijungs R, Köhler A, Olsen SI (2007) Nanotechnology and life cycle assessment. A systems approach to nanotechnology and the environment: synthesis of results obtained at a workshop Washington, DC 2–3 October 2006. European Commission, DG Research, jointly with the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar LY (2015) Role and adverse effects of nanomaterials in food technology. J Toxicol Health 2:2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laux P, Tentschert J, Riebeling C, Braeuning A, Creutzenberg O, Epp A, Fessard V, Haas K, Haase A, Hund-Rinke K, Jakubowski N, Kearns P, Lampen A, Rauscher H, Schoonjans R, Stormer A, Theilmann A, Muhle U, Luch A (2018) Nanomaterials: certain aspects of application, risk assessment and risk communication. Arch Toxicol 92(1):121–141

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Linkov I, TrumpBD WenderBA, SeagerTP Kennedy AJ, Keisler JM (2017) Integrate lifecycle assessment and risk analysis results, not methods. Nature Nanotechnol 12:740–743

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Magdolenova Z, Collins A, Kumar A, Dhawan A, Stone V, Dusinska M (2014) Mechanisms of genotoxicity: a review of in vitroand in vivo studies with engineered nanoparticles. Nanotoxicology 8(3):233–278

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Martirosyan A, Schneider YJ (2014) Engineered nanomaterials in food: implications for food safety and consumer health. Int J Environ Res Pub Health 11:5720–5750

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer DE, Curran MA, Gonzalez M (2009) An examination of existing data for the industrial manufacture and use of nanocomponents and their role in the life cycle impact of nanoproducts. Environ Sci Technol 43(5):1256–1263

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mishra S, Keswani C, Abhilash PC, Fraceto LF, Singh HB (2017) Integrated approach of agri-nanotechnology: challenges and future trends front. Plant Sci 8:471. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.00471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oberdörster G (2012) Nanotoxicology: in vitro-in vivo dosimetry. Environ Health Perspect 120(1):A13. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1104320

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2009) Preliminary review of OECD test guidelines for their applicability to manufactured nanomaterials, ENV/JM/MONO(2009)21

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2014) Report of the OECD expert meeting on the physical chemical properties of manufactured nanomaterials and test guidelines. Series on safety of manufactured nano-materials, 41, ENV/JM/MONO(2014)15

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2016) Physical-chemical parameters: measurements and methods relevant for the regulation of nano-materials.OECD workshop report. Series on safety of manufactured nano-materials, 63, ENV/JM/MONO(2016)2

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfuhler S, Elespuru R, Aardema MJ, Doak SH, Donner EM, Honma M, Kirsch-Volders M, Landsiedel R, Manjanatha M, Singer T, Kim JH (2013) Genotoxicity of nanomaterials: refining strategies and tests for hazard identification. Environ Mol Mutagen 54:229–239

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rajkishore SK, Subramanian KS, Natarajan N, Gunasekaran K (2013) Nanotoxicity at various trophic levels: a review. The Bioscan 8(3):975–982

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen K, Alez MG, Kearns P, Sintes JR, Rossi F, Sayre P (2016) Review of achievements of the OECD working party on manufactured nanomaterials’ testing and assessment programme. From exploratory testing to test guidelines. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 74:147–160

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rossi M, Cubadda F, Dini L, Terranova ML, Aureli F, Sorbo A, Passeri D (2014) Scientific basis of nanotechnology, implications for the food sector and future trends. Trends Food Sci Technol 40:127–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2014.09.004

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sabourin V, Ayande A (2015) Commercial opportunities and market demand for nanotechnologies in agribusiness sector. J Technol Manag Innov 10:40–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SCENIHR (2009) Risk assessment of products of nanotechnologies, 19 January

    Google Scholar 

  • Sengül H, Theis TL, Ghosh S (2008) Toward sustainable nanoproducts: an overview of nanomanufacturing methods. J Indus Ecol 12(3):329–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheehan B, Murphy IDF, Mullins M, Furxhi I, Costa AL, Simeone FC, Mantecca P (2018) Hazard screening methods for nanomaterials: a comparative study. Int J Mol Sci 19:649. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19030649

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shvedova A, Pietroiusti A, Kagan V (2018) Nanotoxicology ten years later: lights and shadows. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 15(299):1–2

    Google Scholar 

  • Sodano V, Verneau F (2014) Competition policy and food sector in the European Union. J Int Food Agribus Mark 26:155–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinfeldt M, von Gleich A, Petschow U, Haum R (2007) Nanotechnologies, hazards and resource efficiency. Springer, Heidelberg

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Subramanian KS, Manikandan A, Thirunavukkarasu M, Rahale CS (2015) In: Rai M et al (eds) Nanotechnologies in food and agriculture. Springer International Publishing, Switzerland, pp 69–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Subramanian KS, Raja K, Marimuthu S (2018) Multifarious applications of nanotechnology for enhanced productivity in agriculture. In: Singh HB, Mishra S, Fraceto LF, de Lima R (eds) Emerging trends in agri-nanotechnology: fundamentals and applied aspects. CAB International, pp 56–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Subramanian KS, Tarafdar JC (2009) Nanotechnology in soil science. In: Proceedings of the Indian society of soil science-platinum jubilee celebration, December 22–25, IARI Campus, New Delhi, pp 199

    Google Scholar 

  • Tantra R, Bouwmeester H, Bolea E, Rey-Castro C, David CA, Dogné, JM, Jarman J, Laborda F, Laloy J, Robinson KN, Undas AK, van der Zande M (2015) Suitability of analytical methods to measure solubility for the purpose of nanoregulation. Nanotoxicology 22:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • TERI (2010) Nanotechnology development in India: building capability and governing the technology. The Energy and Research Institute (TERI) Briefing Paper, supported by IDRC, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  • Thakur S, Thakur S, Kumar R (2018) Bio-nanotechnology and its role in agriculture and food industry. J Mol Genet Med 12:324. https://doi.org/10.4172/1747-0862.1000324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsai JW, Chen WY, Ju YR, Liao CM (2009) Bioavailability links mode of action can improve the long-term field risk assessment for tilapia exposed to arsenic. Environ Int 35(4):727–736

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tsang MP, Hristozov D, Zabeo A, Koivisto AJ, Jensen ACO, Jensen KA, Pang C, Marcomini A, Sonnemann G (2017) Probabilistic risk assessment of emerging materials: case study of titanium dioxide nanoparticles. Nanotoxicology 11:558–568

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • USEPA (US Environmental Protection Agency) (2007) US Environmental Protection Agency Nanotechnology White Paper. USEPA, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Viji N, Chinnamuthu CR (2015) Iron oxide nanoparticles to break the of the world’s worst weed the Cyperusrotandus. Int J Agric Sci Res 5(3):259–266

    Google Scholar 

  • WHO (2017) WHO guidelines on protecting workers from potential risks of manufactured nanomaterials

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang Y, Lin Y, Liao H (2017) Toxicity-based toxicokinetic/toxicodynamic assessment of bioaccumulation and nanotoxicity of zerovalent iron nanoparticles in Caenorhabditiselegans. Int J Nanomed 12:4607–4621

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zion Market Research (ZMR) (2016) Nanomaterials Market (Metal Oxide, Metals, Chemicals & Polymers and Others) for Construction, Chemical Products, Packaging, Consumer Goods, Electrical and Electronics, Energy, Health Care, Transportation and Other Applications: Global Market Perspective, Comprehensive Analysis and Forecast, 2016–2022. https://www.zionmarketresearch.com/report/nanomaterials-market. Accessed on 22 February 2018

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Nano Science & Technology, TNAU, Coimbatore, India

    Kizhaeral S. Subramanian & S. K. Rajkishore

Authors
  1. Kizhaeral S. Subramanian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. S. K. Rajkishore
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kizhaeral S. Subramanian .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biotechnology, Sant Gadge Baba Amravati University, Amravati, Maharashtra, India

    Mahendra Rai

  2. International Centre for Ecological Engineering, Department of Ecological Studies, University of Kalyani, Kalyani, Nadia, West Bengal, India

    Jayanta Kumar Biswas

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Subramanian, K.S., Rajkishore, S.K. (2018). Regulatory Framework for Nanomaterials in Agri-Food Systems. In: Rai, M., Biswas, J. (eds) Nanomaterials: Ecotoxicity, Safety, and Public Perception. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05144-0_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation