Abstract
Assessing the relationship between aid, trade, investment, and development in the Global South, this paper argues that these relationships are mediated by three factors: the intentions of the foreign actor and type of economic input; the robustness of a country or bloc’s government-business-media (GBM) complex; and, finally, the spatiotemporal make-up of a country or bloc. In terms of stimulating human development, the findings suggest that how inputs are used is more operative than what is received, with a robust GBM providing optimal conditions for human development. Overall, aid, foreign direct investment and being landlocked have a negative relationship with development in the Global South, while trade has a small, but statistically significant positive relationship. Contrary to what most argue, resource richness positively impacts on development in the Global South. Countries displaying several of these factors should be particularly cautious as landlocked countries with dysfunctional GBMs, limited resources, and who receive large amounts of aid and investment, are likely to remain underdeveloped.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Anand, S., & Sen, A. (1994). Human Development Index: Methodology and measurement. New York: Human Development Report Office.
Behzadan, N., Chisik, R., Onder, H., & Battaile, B. (2017). Does inequality drive the Dutch disease? Theory and evidence. Journal of International Economics, 106, 104–118.
Collier, P. (2003). Ethnicity, politics and economic performance. Economics and Politics, 12(3), 225–245.
Fearon, J. (2003). Ethnic and cultural diversity by country. Journal of Economic Growth, 8(2), 195–222.
International Monetary Fund. (2012). Macroeconomic policy frameworks for resource-rich developing countries. Retrieved May 22, 2018, from https://www.imf.org/external/np/pp/eng/2012/082412.pdf
Sen, A. (2005). Human rights and capabilities. Journal of Human Development, 6(2), 151–166.
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. (2018). List of land-locked developing countries. Retrieved May 22, 2018, from http://unctad.org/en/pages/aldc/Landlocked%20Developing%20Countries/List-of-land-locked-developing-countries.aspx
United Nations Development Programme. (2016). Technical notes. Retrieved May 22, 2018, from http://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/hdr2016_technical_notes_0.pdf
United Nations Development Programme. (2018). Human development data (1990–2015). Retrieved May 22, 2018, from http://hdr.undp.org/en/data
Uppsala Conflict Data Program. (2018). UCDP downloads. Retrieved May 22, 2018, from http://ucdp.uu.se/downloads/
World Bank. (2018). Worldwide Governance Indicators. Retrieved May 22, 2018, from https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/worldwide-governance-indicators
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
van der Merwe, J., Dodd, N. (2019). Modelling Development in the Global South. In: The Political Economy of Underdevelopment in the Global South. International Political Economy Series. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05096-2_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05096-2_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-05095-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-05096-2
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)